IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v158y2023ics0148296323000152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating institutional complexity through emotion work: The case of Italian consumers adapting to a ketogenic diet

Author

Listed:
  • Corciolani, Matteo

Abstract

Building on marketing studies that adopt an institutional perspective, I examine the dynamics through which consumers navigate institutional complexity. More specifically, I investigate the unique context of Italians abandoning their traditional diet to embrace a ketogenic diet by means of a seven-year netnography of Ketogenesis (an Italian Facebook group dedicated to ketogenic diet), ten interviews with members and managers of this community, and a media analysis of the Italian dietary market. The findings show that these individuals are exposed to various oppositional logics (healthism, weight loss, sociability, and flavor), which trigger negative emotional responses. I thereafter demonstrate that, by participating in ad hoc Facebook groups (i.e., joining Ketogenesis), these consumers perform emotion work based on two key processes (reframing and social support), through which they reframe their negative emotions in more positive terms, support one another, and facilitate the diet’s approval within the community. I also discuss theoretical and managerial implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Corciolani, Matteo, 2023. "Navigating institutional complexity through emotion work: The case of Italian consumers adapting to a ketogenic diet," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:158:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323000152
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323000152
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    2. Risto Moisio & Mariam Beruchashvili, 2010. "Questing for Well-Being at Weight Watchers: The Role of the Spiritual-Therapeutic Model in a Support Group," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(5), pages 857-875, February.
    3. Warde, Alan, 2015. "On the sociology of eating," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 96(01), pages 7-15, March.
    4. Alan Warde, 2015. "On the sociology of eating," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 96(1), pages 7-16.
    5. Daiane Scaraboto & Eileen Fischer, 2013. "Frustrated Fatshionistas: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Consumer Quests for Greater Choice in Mainstream Markets," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(6), pages 1234-1257.
    6. Aimee Dinnin Huff & Ashlee Humphreys & Sarah J.S. Wilner & Eileen FischerEditor & Price Linda LEditor & Julie L Ozanne, 2021. "The Politicization of Objects: Meaning and Materiality in The U.S. Cannabis Market," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(1), pages 22-50.
    7. Ben Slimane, Karim & Chaney, Damien & Humphreys, Ashlee & Leca, Bernard, 2019. "Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 389-394.
    8. Cherrier, Helene & Goswami, Paromita & Ray, Subhasis, 2018. "Social entrepreneurship: Creating value in the context of institutional complexity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 245-258.
    9. Warde, Alan, 2015. "On the sociology of eating," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.
    10. James H. McAlexander & Beth Leavenworth Dufault & Diane M. Martin & John W. Schouten, 2014. "The Marketization of Religion: Field, Capital, and Consumer Identity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 858-875.
    11. Domen Bajde & Pilar Rojas-Gaviria & Eileen Fischer & Linda L Price & Ashlee Humphreys, 2021. "Creating Responsible Subjects: The Role of Mediated Affective Encounters," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(3), pages 492-512.
    12. Zanette, Maria Carolina & Scaraboto, Daiane, 2019. "“To Spanx or not to Spanx”: How objects that carry contradictory institutional logics trigger identity conflict for consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 443-453.
    13. Hartman, Anna E. & Coslor, Erica, 2019. "Earning while giving: Rhetorical strategies for navigating multiple institutional logics in reproductive commodification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 405-419.
    14. Pierre-Yann Dolbec & Eileen Fischer, 2015. "Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1447-1468.
    15. Karim Ben Slimane & Damien Chaney & Ashlee Humphreys & Bernard Leca, 2019. "Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions," Post-Print hal-02534085, HAL.
    16. repec:oup:jconrs:v:47:y:2021:i:5:p:636-653. is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tierney, Kieran D. & Oswald Karpen, Ingo & Westberg, Kate, 2022. "Brand meaning and institutional work: The light and dark sides of service employee practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 244-256.
    2. Wiart, Lucie & Özçağlar-Toulouse, Nil & Shaw, Deirdre, 2022. "Maintaining market legitimacy: A discursive-hegemonic perspective on meat," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 391-402.
    3. Cherrier, Hélène & Türe, Meltem, 2022. "Blame work and the scapegoating mechanism in market status-quo," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1207-1217.
    4. Lee, Chu-Heng & Hsieh, Ming-Huei, 2023. "Market innovation as an institutional reconciliation process: Two individual-level case studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Ben Slimane, Karim & Chaney, Damien & Humphreys, Ashlee & Leca, Bernard, 2019. "Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 389-394.
    6. Stefano Pace & Matteo Corciolani & Giacomo Gistri, 2017. "Consumers? responses to ethical brand crises on social media platforms," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 141-157.
    7. Hartman, Anna E. & Coslor, Erica, 2019. "Earning while giving: Rhetorical strategies for navigating multiple institutional logics in reproductive commodification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 405-419.
    8. Benmecheddal, Ahmed & Nguyen, Arthur & Özçaglar-Toulouse, Nil, 2023. "The micro dynamics of participation in collective market work: The case of Community-Supported Agriculture in France," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Ghaffari, Mahsa & Jafari, Aliakbar & Sandikci, Ozlem, 2019. "The role of mundane and subtle institutional work in market dynamics: A case of fashion clothing market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 434-442.
    10. Breidbach, Christoph F. & Tana, Silviana, 2021. "Betting on Bitcoin: How social collectives shape cryptocurrency markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 311-320.
    11. Séverine Gojard & Bérangère Véron, 2018. "Shopping and cooking: the organization of food practices, at the crossing of access to food stores and household properties in France," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 97-119, June.
    12. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka, 2021. "Market-shaping: navigating multiple theoretical perspectives," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 336-353, December.
    13. Go Jefferies, Josephine & Bishop, Simon & Hibbert, Sally, 2019. "Customer boundary work to navigate institutional arrangements around service interactions: Exploring the case of telehealth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 420-433.
    14. Joy, Annamma & Wang, Jeff Jianfeng & Orazi, Davide C. & Yoon, Seyee & LaTour, Kathryn & Peña, Camilo, 2023. "Co-creating affective atmospheres in retail experience," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 297-317.
    15. Steven Shepherd & Ted Matherly, 2021. "Racialization of peer‐to‐peer transactions: Inequality and barriers to legitimacy," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 417-444, June.
    16. Ndichu, Edna G. & Rittenburg, Terri L., 2021. "Consumers’ navigation of risk perceptions in the adoption of stigmatized products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 340-353.
    17. Laetitia Mimoun & Lez Trujillo-Torres & Francesca Sobande, 2022. "Social Emotions and the Legitimation of the Fertility Technology Market [The Role of Emotions in Marketing]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(6), pages 1073-1095.
    18. Erz, Antonia & Heeris Christensen, Anna-Bertha, 2018. "Transforming Consumers Into Brands: Tracing Transformation Processes of the Practice of Blogging," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 69-82.
    19. Nicoletta Buratti & Francesco Derchi & Giorgia Profumo, 2015. "The blurred boundary between empowered and working consumers: insights from the winner taco case," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(4), pages 133-156.
    20. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka & Charlotta Windahl, 2019. "Capabilities for market-shaping: triggering and facilitating increased value creation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 617-639, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:158:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323000152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.