IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v157y2023ics0148296322010244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The micro dynamics of participation in collective market work: The case of Community-Supported Agriculture in France

Author

Listed:
  • Benmecheddal, Ahmed
  • Nguyen, Arthur
  • Özçaglar-Toulouse, Nil

Abstract

Consumer and market researchers have studied market shaping as the outcomes of institutional struggles. By focusing on the macro dynamics, scholars have explained how markets change over time. However, they have paid less attention to understand the forces that animate people’s participation in a market and under what conditions this participation persists. To advance the literature, this paper focuses on the micro dynamics of markets. Developing insights from ethnographic research based on three years spent in a Community-Supported Agriculture, we show how personal and historical concerns shape actors’ commitments to and participation in a market. Plus, we explain how actors evaluate their participation in a market, leading to change the micro dynamics of the market. Our findings contribute to existing theorizations of market shaping and have managerial implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Benmecheddal, Ahmed & Nguyen, Arthur & Özçaglar-Toulouse, Nil, 2023. "The micro dynamics of participation in collective market work: The case of Community-Supported Agriculture in France," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:157:y:2023:i:c:s0148296322010244
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322010244
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Giesler, 2008. "Conflict and Compromise: Drama in Marketplace Evolution," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(6), pages 739-753, August.
    2. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    3. Daiane Scaraboto & Eileen Fischer, 2013. "Frustrated Fatshionistas: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Consumer Quests for Greater Choice in Mainstream Markets," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(6), pages 1234-1257.
    4. Émilie Lanciano & Séverine Saleilles, 2011. "Le travail institutionnel du mouvement des Amap," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(8), pages 155-172.
    5. Diaz Ruiz, Carlos & Makkar, Marian, 2021. "Market bifurcations in board sports: How consumers shape markets through boundary work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 38-50.
    6. Laura Raynolds, 2000. "Re-embedding global agriculture: The international organic and fair trade movements," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 17(3), pages 297-309, September.
    7. Ghaffari, Mahsa & Jafari, Aliakbar & Sandikci, Ozlem, 2019. "The role of mundane and subtle institutional work in market dynamics: A case of fashion clothing market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 434-442.
    8. Craig J. Thompson & Gokcen Coskuner-Balli, 2007. "Countervailing Market Responses to Corporate Co-optation and the Ideological Recruitment of Consumption Communities," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(2), pages 135-152, June.
    9. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka & Charlotta Windahl, 2019. "Capabilities for market-shaping: triggering and facilitating increased value creation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 617-639, July.
    10. Beninger, Stefanie & Francis, June N.P., 2021. "Collective market shaping by competitors and its contribution to market resilience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 293-303.
    11. Émilie Lanciano & Séverine Saleilles, 2011. "Le travail institutionnel du mouvement des AMAP," Post-Print halshs-00659543, HAL.
    12. Regany, Fatima & Benmecheddal, Ahmed & Belkhir, Meriam & Djelassi, Souad, 2021. "Conflicting coexistence of legitimation and delegitimation logics in a revived market: The case of a traditional clothing market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 438-449.
    13. Pierre-Yann Dolbec & Eileen Fischer, 2015. "Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1447-1468.
    14. Özlem Sandikci & Güliz Ger, 2010. "Veiling in Style: How Does a Stigmatized Practice Become Fashionable?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(1), pages 15-36, June.
    15. Eleni Papaoikonomou & Mireia Valverde & Gerard Ryan, 2012. "Articulating the Meanings of Collective Experiences of Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 15-32, September.
    16. Paul Ingenbleek & Machiel Reinders, 2013. "The Development of a Market for Sustainable Coffee in The Netherlands: Rethinking the Contribution of Fair Trade," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 461-474, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghaffari, Mahsa & Jafari, Aliakbar & Sandikci, Ozlem, 2019. "The role of mundane and subtle institutional work in market dynamics: A case of fashion clothing market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 434-442.
    2. Lee, Chu-Heng & Hsieh, Ming-Huei, 2023. "Market innovation as an institutional reconciliation process: Two individual-level case studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Biraghi, Silvia & Gambetti, Rossella & Pace, Stefano, 2018. "Between tribes and markets: The emergence of a liquid consumer-entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 392-402.
    4. Alexander Flaig & Daniel Kindström & Mikael Ottosson, 2021. "Market-shaping phases—a qualitative meta-analysis and conceptual framework," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 354-374, December.
    5. Heiko Wieland & Angeline Nariswari & Melissa Archpru Akaka, 2021. "On managerial relevance: reconciling the academic-practitioner divide through market theorizing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 252-271, December.
    6. Geiger, Susi & Kjellberg, Hans, 2021. "Market mash ups: The process of combinatorial market innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 445-457.
    7. Regany, Fatima & Benmecheddal, Ahmed & Belkhir, Meriam & Djelassi, Souad, 2021. "Conflicting coexistence of legitimation and delegitimation logics in a revived market: The case of a traditional clothing market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 438-449.
    8. Diaz Ruiz, Carlos & Makkar, Marian, 2021. "Market bifurcations in board sports: How consumers shape markets through boundary work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 38-50.
    9. Laetitia Mimoun & Lez Trujillo-Torres & Francesca Sobande, 2022. "Social Emotions and the Legitimation of the Fertility Technology Market [The Role of Emotions in Marketing]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(6), pages 1073-1095.
    10. Nicoletta Buratti & Francesco Derchi & Giorgia Profumo, 2015. "The blurred boundary between empowered and working consumers: insights from the winner taco case," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(4), pages 133-156.
    11. Stefano Pace & Matteo Corciolani & Giacomo Gistri, 2017. "Consumers? responses to ethical brand crises on social media platforms," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 141-157.
    12. Jenna Drenten & Robert L Harrison & Nicholas J Pendarvis, 2023. "More Gamer, Less Girl: Gendered Boundaries, Tokenism, and the Cultural Persistence of Masculine Dominance," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 50(1), pages 2-24.
    13. Melea Press, 2021. "Developing a strong sustainability research program in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 96-114, June.
    14. Busca, Laurent & Bertrandias, Laurent, 2020. "A Framework for Digital Marketing Research: Investigating the Four Cultural Eras of Digital Marketing," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-19.
    15. Breidbach, Christoph F. & Tana, Silviana, 2021. "Betting on Bitcoin: How social collectives shape cryptocurrency markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 311-320.
    16. Swapan Deep Arora, 2024. "Consumer proactive empowerment: A systematic review and taxonomy development," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(1), pages 104-121, June.
    17. Bernard Cova & Gerald Gaglio & Juliette Weber & Philippe Chanial, 2018. "Organizational Sensemaking of Non-ethical Consumer Behavior: Case Study of a French Mutual Insurance Company," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 783-799, April.
    18. Akon E. Ekpo & Benét DeBerry-Spence & Geraldine Rosa Henderson & Joseph Cherian, 2018. "Narratives of technology consumption in the face of marketplace discrimination," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 451-463, December.
    19. Stathakopoulos, Vlasis & Kottikas, Konstantinos G. & Painesis, Grigorios & Theodorakis, Ioannis G. & Kottika, Efthymia, 2022. "Why shape a market? Empirical evidence on the prominent firm-level and market-level outcomes of market-driving strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1240-1254.
    20. Wiart, Lucie & Özçağlar-Toulouse, Nil & Shaw, Deirdre, 2022. "Maintaining market legitimacy: A discursive-hegemonic perspective on meat," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 391-402.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:157:y:2023:i:c:s0148296322010244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.