IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v122y2021icp311-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Betting on Bitcoin: How social collectives shape cryptocurrency markets

Author

Listed:
  • Breidbach, Christoph F.
  • Tana, Silviana

Abstract

Market-shaping research assumes that firms are the primary actor to lead, manage, and respond to the formation of markets. This viewpoint is increasingly being challenged, but empirical insights explaining the roles, resources and actions of actors other than firms shaping markets remain limited. We address this gap in knowledge by drawing on insights from an in-depth ethnography of market-shaping in the context of cryptocurrency communities. Our theoretical and empirical contributions consist of a typology that highlights four distinct roles performed by individuals shaping cryptocurrency markets. We furthermore identify six micro-level market actions, and delineate a novel theoretical model and propositions outlining the pathways with which these actions impact market size, market offerings, as well as market functioning. This study thereby establishes an important avenue for future research, and offers managerial guidelines enabling practitioners attempting to benefit from cryptocurrencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Breidbach, Christoph F. & Tana, Silviana, 2021. "Betting on Bitcoin: How social collectives shape cryptocurrency markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 311-320.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:122:y:2021:i:c:p:311-320
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632030597X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Nirmalya & Scheer, Lisa & Kotler, Philip, 2000. "From market driven to market driving," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 129-142, April.
    2. Markus Giesler, 2008. "Conflict and Compromise: Drama in Marketplace Evolution," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(6), pages 739-753, August.
    3. Boyaval, Marine & Herbert, Maud, 2018. "One for all and all for one? The bliss and torment in communal entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 412-422.
    4. Jaeger, Nikolai A. & Zacharias, Nicolas A. & Brettel, Malte, 2016. "Nonlinear and dynamic effects of responsive and proactive market orientation: A longitudinal investigation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 767-779.
    5. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka & Charlotta Windahl, 2019. "Capabilities for market-shaping: triggering and facilitating increased value creation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 617-639, July.
    6. Pierre-Yann Dolbec & Eileen Fischer, 2015. "Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1447-1468.
    7. Ben Slimane, Karim & Chaney, Damien & Humphreys, Ashlee & Leca, Bernard, 2019. "Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 389-394.
    8. Karim Ben Slimane & Damien Chaney & Ashlee Humphreys & Bernard Leca, 2019. "Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions," Post-Print hal-02534085, HAL.
    9. Brandon H. Lee & Jeroen Struben & Christopher B. Bingham, 2018. "Collective action and market formation: An integrative framework," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 242-266, January.
    10. Schembri, Sharon, 2009. "Reframing brand experience: The experiential meaning of Harley-Davidson," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 1299-1310, December.
    11. Robert V. Kozinets, 2008. "Technology/Ideology: How Ideological Fields Influence Consumers' Technology Narratives," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(6), pages 865-881, October.
    12. Adelstein, Richard, 2010. "Firms as social actors," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 329-349, September.
    13. Jaeger, Nikolai & Zacharias, Nicolas & Brettel, Malte, 2016. "Nonlinear and Dynamic Effects of Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation: A Longitudinal Investigation," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 84726, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    14. Diane M. Martin & John W. Schouten, 2014. "Consumption-Driven Market Emergence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(5), pages 855-870.
    15. Ghauri, Pervez & Wang, Fatima & Elg, Ulf & Rosendo-Ríos, Veronica, 2016. "Market driving strategies: Beyond localization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5682-5693.
    16. Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku, 1996. "Market orientation and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 93-103, February.
    17. Richard Adelstein, 2010. "Firms as Social Actors," Wesleyan Economics Working Papers 2013-003, Wesleyan University, Department of Economics.
    18. Black, Iain & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2017. "Working consumers: Co-creation of brand identity, consumer identity and brand community identity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 416-429.
    19. Jeroen Struben & Brandon H. Lee, 2018. "Collective Action, Networks, and Critical Mass for Market Formation," Post-Print hal-02312207, HAL.
    20. Brandon H. Lee & Jeroen Struben & Christopher B. Bingham, 2018. "Collective Action and Market Formation : An Integrative Framework," Post-Print hal-02312054, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colombo, Jéfferson Augusto & Yarovaya, Larisa, 2024. "Are crypto and non-crypto investors alike? Evidence from a comprehensive survey in Brazil," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Torres Pena, Maria Veronica & Breidbach, Christoph F., 2021. "On emergence in service platforms: An application to P2P lending," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 337-347.
    3. Sánchez, Marisa A., 2022. "A multi-level perspective on financial technology transitions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Stathakopoulos, Vlasis & Kottikas, Konstantinos G. & Painesis, Grigorios & Theodorakis, Ioannis G. & Kottika, Efthymia, 2022. "Why shape a market? Empirical evidence on the prominent firm-level and market-level outcomes of market-driving strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1240-1254.
    5. George Vlahavas & Athena Vakali, 2024. "Dynamics between Bitcoin Market Trends and Social Media Activity," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-30, July.
    6. Yilmaz, Tuba & Sagfossen, Sofie & Velasco, Carlos, 2023. "What makes NFTs valuable to consumers? Perceived value drivers associated with NFTs liking, purchasing, and holding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Khalek, Sk Abu & Chakraborty, Anirban, 2023. "Access or collaboration? A typology of sharing economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    8. Ullah, Subhan & Attah-Boakye, Rexford & Adams, Kweku & Zaefarian, Ghasem, 2022. "Assessing the influence of celebrity and government endorsements on bitcoin’s price volatility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 228-239.
    9. Belk, Russell & Humayun, Mariam & Brouard, Myriam, 2022. "Money, possessions, and ownership in the Metaverse: NFTs, cryptocurrencies, Web3 and Wild Markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 198-205.
    10. Petar, Radanliev, 2023. "The Rise and Fall of Cryptocurrencies: Defining the Economic and Social Values of Blockchain Technologies, assessing the Opportunities, and defining the Financial and Cybersecurity Risks of the Metave," MPRA Paper 118249, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Alexander Flaig & Daniel Kindström & Mikael Ottosson, 2021. "Market-shaping phases—a qualitative meta-analysis and conceptual framework," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 354-374, December.
    12. Paul, Tripti & Mondal, Sandeep & Islam, Nazrul & Rakshit, Sandip, 2021. "The impact of blockchain technology on the tea supply chain and its sustainable performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Koray Caliskan, 2022. "The Elephant in the Dark: A New Framework for Cryptocurrency Taxation and Exchange Platform Regulation in the US," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Jafari, Aliakbar & Aly, Marwa & Doherty, Anne Marie, 2022. "An analytical review of market system dynamics in consumer culture theory research: Insights from the sociology of markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1261-1274.
    15. Yongzhi Gong & Xiaofei Tang & En-Chung Chang, 2023. "Group norms and policy norms trigger different autonomous motivations for Chinese investors in cryptocurrency investment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka, 2021. "Market-shaping: navigating multiple theoretical perspectives," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 336-353, December.
    2. Lee, Chu-Heng & Hsieh, Ming-Huei, 2023. "Market innovation as an institutional reconciliation process: Two individual-level case studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka & Charlotta Windahl, 2019. "Capabilities for market-shaping: triggering and facilitating increased value creation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 617-639, July.
    4. Alexander Flaig & Daniel Kindström & Mikael Ottosson, 2021. "Market-shaping phases—a qualitative meta-analysis and conceptual framework," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 354-374, December.
    5. Wiart, Lucie & Özçağlar-Toulouse, Nil & Shaw, Deirdre, 2022. "Maintaining market legitimacy: A discursive-hegemonic perspective on meat," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 391-402.
    6. Diaz Ruiz, Carlos & Makkar, Marian, 2021. "Market bifurcations in board sports: How consumers shape markets through boundary work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 38-50.
    7. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Jeroen Struben & Brandon H. Lee & Christopher B. Bingham, 2020. "Collective Action Problems and Resource Allocation During Market Formation," Post-Print hal-02927584, HAL.
    9. Krzeminska, Anna & Lundmark, Erik & Härtel, Charmine E.J., 2021. "Legitimation of a heterogeneous market category through covert prototype differentiation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(2).
    10. Dharmani, Pranav & Das, Satyasiba & Prashar, Sanjeev, 2021. "A bibliometric analysis of creative industries: Current trends and future directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 252-267.
    11. Biraghi, Silvia & Gambetti, Rossella & Pace, Stefano, 2018. "Between tribes and markets: The emergence of a liquid consumer-entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 392-402.
    12. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Kumar, Ajay & Gupta, Shivam & Sengupta, Pooja, 2023. "Rethinking of firm innovation capability: Examining the moderating role of leadership ability on a new business model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    13. Lin Zhou & Walter Timo de Vries, 2022. "Collective Action for the Market-Based Reform of Land Element in China: The Role of Trust," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Stathakopoulos, Vlasis & Kottikas, Konstantinos G. & Painesis, Grigorios & Theodorakis, Ioannis G. & Kottika, Efthymia, 2022. "Why shape a market? Empirical evidence on the prominent firm-level and market-level outcomes of market-driving strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1240-1254.
    15. Shon R. Hiatt & W. Chad Carlos & Wesley D. Sine, 2018. "Manu Militari : The Institutional Contingencies of Stakeholder Relationships on Entrepreneurial Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 633-652, August.
    16. Valentin Clemens & Christopher Albert Sabel & Johann Nils Foege & Stephan Nüesch, 2022. "System Design Choice in the Sharing Economy: How Different Institutional Logics Drive Consumer Perception and Consumers’ Intention to Use Sharing Systems," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 201-234, June.
    17. Cherrier, Hélène & Türe, Meltem, 2022. "Blame work and the scapegoating mechanism in market status-quo," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1207-1217.
    18. Yong Li & Jing Li & Peng Zhang & Sunhwan Gwon, 2023. "Stronger together: Country‐of‐origin agglomeration and multinational enterprise location choice in an adverse institutional environment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 1053-1083, April.
    19. Wujuan Zhai & Florence Yean Yng Ling & Jiyong Ding & Zhuofu Wang, 2023. "Impact of Institutional Pressures on Socially Responsible Collective Action Behaviors for Major Water Transfer Projects," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(11), pages 4253-4269, September.
    20. Geiger, Susi & Kjellberg, Hans, 2021. "Market mash ups: The process of combinatorial market innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 445-457.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:122:y:2021:i:c:p:311-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.