IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v30y2012i6p603-614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The tertius roles in a coopetitive context: The case of the European aeronautical and aerospace engineering sector

Author

Listed:
  • Salvetat, David
  • Géraudel, Mickaël

Abstract

How can coopetition between rival firms be created and supported, given the risks of opportunism inherent to the coopetitive context? The literature on tertius gaudens (the third-actor who benefits from the others) and tertius iungens (the third who joins) provides some answers to this question. Using an abductive approach based on grounded theory, we sought to describe these tertius roles in the coopetitive process. We conducted 58 structured interviews in 37 organizations in the European aeronautical and aerospace engineering sector. We identified two main classes of third actors who play intermediation roles: decision-makers and go-betweens. Each competitor in the supply chain is managed in accordance with the third-actor profile.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvetat, David & Géraudel, Mickaël, 2012. "The tertius roles in a coopetitive context: The case of the European aeronautical and aerospace engineering sector," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 603-614.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:30:y:2012:i:6:p:603-614
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2012.04.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237312000382
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2012.04.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Carlos Jarillo, 1988. "On strategic networks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 31-41, January.
    2. Vincent Frigant & Damien Talbot, 2005. "Technological Determinism and Modularity: Lessons from a Comparison between Aircraft and Auto Industries in Europe," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 337-355.
    3. Johanson, Jan & Mattsson, Lars-Gunnar, 1987. "Interorganizational relations in industrial systems : a network approach compared with the transaction cost approach," Working Papers 1987:7, Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies.
    4. Jean-Marc Zuliani, 2007. "The Toulouse Cluster of On-board Systems: A Process of Collective Innovation and Learning," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 711-726, September.
    5. Med Kechidi & Damien Talbot, 2010. "Institutions and coordination: what is the contribution of a proximity-based analysis? The case of Airbus and its relations with the subcontracting network," Post-Print hal-02354283, HAL.
    6. Colette Depeyre & Hervé Dumez, 2010. "The role of architectural players in coopetition: the case of the US defense industry," Post-Print hal-00539561, HAL.
    7. Depeyre, Colette & Dumez, Hervé, 2009. "A management perspective on market dynamics: Stabilizing and destabilizing strategies in the US defense industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 90-99, April.
    8. Pierre Dussauge & Bernard Garrette, 1995. "Determinants of Success in International Strategic Alliances: Evidence from the Global Aerospace Industry," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 26(3), pages 505-530, September.
    9. Vilanova, Laurent, 2007. "Neither Shareholder nor Stakeholder Management:: What Happens When Firms are Run for their Short-term Salient Stakeholder?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 146-162, April.
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5571 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Hans B. Thorelli, 1986. "Networks: Between markets and hierarchies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 37-51, January.
    12. Daniel F. Spulber, 2003. "The intermediation theory of the firm: integrating economic and management approaches to strategy," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 253-266.
    13. Bidault, Francis & Salgado, Melchior, 2001. "Stability and Complexity of Inter-Firm Co-operation:: The case of Multi-Point Alliances," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 619-628, December.
    14. Luo, Yadong, 2007. "A coopetition perspective of global competition," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 129-144, June.
    15. Marcello M. Mariani, 2007. "Coopetition as an Emergent Strategy: Empirical Evidence from an Italian Consortium of Opera Houses," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 97-126, January.
    16. Colette Depeyre & Hervé Dumez, 2009. "A management perspective on market dynamics: stabilizing and destabilizing strategies in the US defense industry," Post-Print hal-00402078, HAL.
    17. Jorge Niosi & Majlinda Zhegu, 2005. "Aerospace Clusters: Local or Global Knowledge Spillovers?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 5-29.
    18. Bernard Garrette & Pierre Dussauge, 1995. "Determinants of Success in International Strategic Alliances: Evidence from the Global Aerospace Industry," Post-Print hal-00458889, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julien Granata & Marie-Clémence da Fonseca & Pierre Marques & Mickaël Géraudel, 2016. "The dynamic of SMEs collective strategy: the case of Pic Saint-Loup winemakers [Dynamique d'évolution d'une stratégie collective entre PME : le cas des vignerons du Pic Saint- Loup]," Post-Print hal-01588177, HAL.
    2. Ritala, Paavo & Huizingh, Eelko & Almpanopoulou, Argyro & Wijbenga, Paul, 2017. "Tensions in R&D networks: Implications for knowledge search and integration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 311-322.
    3. Sascha Kraus & Jasmin Schmid & Johanna Gast, 2017. "Innovation through coopetition: An analysis of small-and medium-sized trust companies operating in the Liechtenstein financial centre," Post-Print hal-02945322, HAL.
    4. Korpas, Edyta & De Beule, Filip & Verwaal, Ernst, 2021. "Dependence and uncertainty in broker strategies of research intermediaries," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 34-45.
    5. Katsaliaki, Korina & Kumar, Sameer & Loulos, Vasilis, 2024. "Supply chain coopetition: A review of structures, mechanisms and dynamics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    6. Hubert J. Kiss & Alfonso Rosa-Garcia & Vita Zhukova, 2019. "Coopetition in group contest," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1911, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    7. Dorn, Stefanie & Schweiger, Bastian & Albers, Sascha, 2016. "Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 484-500.
    8. Julien Granata & Mickaël Géraudel & Katherine Gundolf & Johanna Gast & Pierre Marques, 2016. "Organisational innovation and coopetition between SMEs: a tertius strategies approach," Post-Print hal-01691943, HAL.
    9. Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Violeta Radulescu & Stefan Alexandru Ionescu, 2018. "What Makes Coopetition Successful? An Inter-Organizational Side Analysis on Coopetition Critical Success Factors in Oil and Gas Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biggiero, Lucio & Angelini, Pier Paolo, 2015. "Hunting scale-free properties in R&D collaboration networks: Self-organization, power-law and policy issues in the European aerospace research area," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 21-43.
    2. Christophe CARRINCAZEAUX (e3i-IFReDE-GRES) & Vincent FRIGANT (e3i-IFReDE-GRES), 2006. "The internationalisation of the French aerospace industry in the 1990s: a break with the past? (In French)," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2006-15, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
    3. Dirk Meissner, 2012. "The Economic Impact of Spillovers from R&D and Innovation," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(4), pages 20-31.
    4. Ekaterina Turkina & Ari Van Assche, 2018. "Global Connectedness and Local Innovation in Industrial Clusters," CIRANO Working Papers 2018s-12, CIRANO.
    5. Damien Talbot, 2015. "Contrôles et proximités au sein de la supply chain aéronautique," Post-Print hal-02351969, HAL.
    6. Jean Sébastien Lacam & David Salvetat & Jean-Sébastien Lacam, 2017. "The complexity of co-opetitive networks," Post-Print hal-02083201, HAL.
    7. Laaksonen, Toni & Jarimo, Toni & Kulmala, Harri I., 2009. "Cooperative strategies in customer-supplier relationships: The role of interfirm trust," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 79-87, July.
    8. Guffarth, Daniel & Barber, Michael J., 2014. "Network evolution, success, and regional development in the European aerospace industry," FZID Discussion Papers 96-2014, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
    9. Davis, James H. & Patterson, J. Dennis & Grazin, Igor, 1996. "The collapse and reemergence of networks within and between Republics of the Former Soviet Union," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Lee, Joosung J. & Yoon, Hyungseok, 2015. "A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex products systems: Distinctive paths of three latecomers in military aircraft industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1296-1313.
    11. Ekaterina Turkina & Ari Van Assche & Raja Kali, 2016. "Network Structure and Industrial Clustering Dynamics in the Aerospace Industry," CIRANO Working Papers 2016s-14, CIRANO.
    12. Sturgeon, Timothy J., 1997. "Turnkey Production Networks: A New American Model of Industrial Organization?," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt2095c9d0, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    13. Ekaterina Turkina & Ari Van Assche, 2018. "Global connectedness and local innovation in industrial clusters," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(6), pages 706-728, August.
    14. Lei, Han-Sheng & Chen, Yung-Shuan, 2011. "The right tree for the right bird: Location choice decision of Taiwanese firms' FDI in China and Vietnam," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 338-352, June.
    15. Tseng, C. -H. & Yu, C-M. J. & Seetoo, D. H. W., 2002. "The relationships between types of network organization and adoption of management mechanisms: an empirical study of knowledge transactions of MNC's subsidiaries in Taiwan," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 211-230, April.
    16. Julie Bastianutti, 2011. "Meeting with David Baron and introducing private politics," Post-Print hal-00657320, HAL.
    17. Sturgeon, Timothy J., 1997. "Does Manufacturing Still Matter? The Organizational Delinking of Production from Innovation," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt2g22d9d2, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    18. Emilio Bellini & Giuseppe Piroli & Luca Pennacchio, 2019. "Collaborative know-how and trust in university–industry collaborations: empirical evidence from ICT firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1939-1963, December.
    19. Vincent FRIGANT & Stéphanie PERES & Stéphane VIROL, 2012. "How do SMEs to rise at the top of the supply chain? An econometric exploration of the French auto industry (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-16, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    20. H. Pierre Hsieh & Yueh‐Cheng Wu & Wen‐Min Lu & Yao‐Chieh Chen, 2020. "Assessing and ranking the innovation ability and business performance of global companies in the aerospace and defense industry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 952-963, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:30:y:2012:i:6:p:603-614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.