IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v45y2012i1p329-338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combined hydrothermal carbonization and gasification of biomass with carbon capture

Author

Listed:
  • Erlach, B.
  • Harder, B.
  • Tsatsaronis, G.

Abstract

Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) can result in negative net carbon emissions and may therefore provide an important technology option for meeting current greenhouse gas stabilization targets. To this end, syngas from biomass gasification combined with pre-combustion carbon capture can be used to produce either biofuels or electricity. Pre-treating the biomass with hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) produces a coal-like substance, biocoal, which is potentially better suited for entrained flow gasification than raw biomass. This paper compares HTC followed by entrained flow gasification of the biocoal with fluidized bed gasification of raw wood, both with carbon capture and storage (CCS). Simulation studies undertaken with Aspen Plus are interpreted using exergy analysis. Syngas production is more efficient from biocoal than from raw wood but the conversion losses in the HTC process outweigh the efficiency gains in the gasification. Carbon losses through gaseous and dissolved byproducts in the HTC also limit the capture rate. A CCS-IGCC with fluidized bed gasification using raw wood results in an electrical efficiency of 28.6% (HHV) and a carbon capture rate of 84.5%, while the conversion chain of HTC and a CCS-IGCC with entrained flow gasification yields an electrical efficiency of 27.7% and a capture rate of 72.7%.

Suggested Citation

  • Erlach, B. & Harder, B. & Tsatsaronis, G., 2012. "Combined hydrothermal carbonization and gasification of biomass with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 329-338.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:45:y:2012:i:1:p:329-338
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054421200062X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ottmar Edenhofer , Brigitte Knopf, Terry Barker, Lavinia Baumstark, Elie Bellevrat, Bertrand Chateau, Patrick Criqui, Morna Isaac, Alban Kitous, Socrates Kypreos, Marian Leimbach, Kai Lessmann, Bertra, 2010. "The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    2. Ottmar Edenhofer & Brigitte Knopf & Terry Barker & Lavinia Baumstark & Elie Bellevrat & Bertrand Chateau & Patrick Criqui & Morna Isaac & Alban Kitous & Socrates Kypreos & Marian Leimbach & Kai Lessma, 2010. "The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs," The Energy Journal, , vol. 31(1_suppl), pages 11-48, June.
    3. Descamps, C. & Bouallou, C. & Kanniche, M., 2008. "Efficiency of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plant including CO2 removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 874-881.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lifita N. Tande & Erik Resendiz-Mora & Valerie Dupont, 2021. "Bioh 2 , Heat and Power from Palm Empty Fruit Bunch via Pyrolysis-Autothermal Reforming: Plant Simulation, Experiments, and CO 2 Mitigation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Bobo Zheng & Jiuping Xu, 2014. "Carbon Capture and Storage Development Trends from a Techno-Paradigm Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Gao, Ying & Wang, Xianhua & Wang, Jun & Li, Xiangpeng & Cheng, Jianjun & Yang, Haiping & Chen, Hanping, 2013. "Effect of residence time on chemical and structural properties of hydrochar obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of water hyacinth," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 376-383.
    4. Xu, Gang & Zhou, Luyao & Zhao, Shifei & Liang, Feifei & Xu, Cheng & Yang, Yongping, 2015. "Optimum superheat utilization of extraction steam in double reheat ultra-supercritical power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 863-872.
    5. Gai, Chao & Chen, Mengjun & Liu, Tingting & Peng, Nana & Liu, Zhengang, 2016. "Gasification characteristics of hydrochar and pyrochar derived from sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 957-965.
    6. Ramos, João S. & Ferreira, Ana F., 2022. "Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of olive and wine industry co-products valorisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Nizamuddin, Sabzoi & Baloch, Humair Ahmed & Griffin, G.J. & Mubarak, N.M. & Bhutto, Abdul Waheed & Abro, Rashid & Mazari, Shaukat Ali & Ali, Brahim Si, 2017. "An overview of effect of process parameters on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1289-1299.
    8. Anna Biniek-Poskart & Marcin Sajdak & Magdalena Skrzyniarz & Jakub Rzącki & Andrzej Skibiński & Monika Zajemska, 2023. "The Application of Lignocellulosic Biomass Waste in the Iron and Steel Industry in the Context of Challenges Related to the Energy Crisis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Ning, Xiaojun & Dang, Han & Xu, Runsheng & Wang, Guangwei & Zhang, Jianliang & Zhang, Nan & Wang, Chuan, 2022. "Co-hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and PVC for clean blast furnace injection fuel production: Experiment and DFT calculation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 156-168.
    10. López, R. & González-Arias, J. & Pereira, F.J. & Fernández, C. & Cara-Jiménez, J., 2021. "A techno-economic study of HTC processes coupled with power facilities and oxy-combustion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    11. Zhuang, Xiuzheng & Liu, Jianguo & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Chenguang & Zhan, Hao & Ma, Longlong, 2022. "A review on the utilization of industrial biowaste via hydrothermal carbonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Dang, Han & Xu, Runsheng & Zhang, Jianliang & Wang, Mingyong & Ye, Lian & Jia, Guoli, 2023. "Removal of oxygen-containing functional groups during hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: Experimental and DFT study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    13. Shie, Je-Lueng & Chen, Li-Xun & Lin, Kae-Long & Chang, Ching-Yuan, 2014. "Plasmatron gasification of biomass lignocellulosic waste materials derived from municipal solid waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 82-89.
    14. Xiang, Yanlei & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & He, Tianzhi & Li, Juan, 2019. "Study on the biomass-based integrated gasification combined cycle with negative CO2 emissions under different temperatures and pressures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 571-580.
    15. Tekin, Kubilay & Karagöz, Selhan & Bektaş, Sema, 2014. "A review of hydrothermal biomass processing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 673-687.
    16. Umut Şen & Bruno Esteves & Helena Pereira, 2023. "Pyrolysis and Extraction of Bark in a Biorefineries Context: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    18. Zhao, Peitao & Shen, Yafei & Ge, Shifu & Chen, Zhenqian & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2014. "Clean solid biofuel production from high moisture content waste biomass employing hydrothermal treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 345-367.
    19. Li, Yuanyuan & Zhou, Luyao & Xu, Gang & Fang, Yaxiong & Zhao, Shifei & Yang, Yongping, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a double reheat system in an ultra-supercritical power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 202-214.
    20. Hrnčič, Maša Knez & Kravanja, Gregor & Knez, Željko, 2016. "Hydrothermal treatment of biomass for energy and chemicals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P2), pages 1312-1322.
    21. Gai, Chao & Dong, Yuping & Zhang, Tonghui, 2014. "Downdraft gasification of corn straw as a non-woody biomass: Effects of operating conditions on chlorides distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 638-644.
    22. Sharma, Ashokkumar M. & Kumar, Ajay & Madihally, Sundararajan & Whiteley, James R. & Huhnke, Raymond L., 2014. "Prediction of biomass-generated syngas using extents of major reactions in a continuous stirred-tank reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 222-232.
    23. Gunarathne, Duleeka Sandamali & Mueller, Andreas & Fleck, Sabine & Kolb, Thomas & Chmielewski, Jan Karol & Yang, Weihong & Blasiak, Wlodzimierz, 2014. "Gasification characteristics of steam exploded biomass in an updraft pilot scale gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 496-506.
    24. Mansouri, Noura Y. & Crookes, Roy J. & Korakianitis, Theodosios, 2013. "A projection of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in the electricity sector for Saudi Arabia: The case for carbon capture and storage and solar photovoltaics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 681-695.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dietz, Simon & Gollier, Christian & Kessler, Louise, 2018. "The climate beta," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 258-274.
    2. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "A Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 8145, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Detlef Vuuren & Elke Stehfest, 2013. "If climate action becomes urgent: the importance of response times for various climate strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 473-486, December.
    4. van der Zwaan, Bob & Kober, Tom & Calderon, Silvia & Clarke, Leon & Daenzer, Katie & Kitous, Alban & Labriet, Maryse & Lucena, André F.P. & Octaviano, Claudia & Di Sbroiavacca, Nicolas, 2016. "Energy technology roll-out for climate change mitigation: A multi-model study for Latin America," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 526-542.
    5. Audoly, Richard & Vogt-Schilb, Adrien & Guivarch, Céline & Pfeiffer, Alexander, 2018. "Pathways toward zero-carbon electricity required for climate stabilization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 884-901.
    6. Lennox, James A. & Witajewski-Baltvilks, Jan, 2017. "Directed technical change with capital-embodied technologies: Implications for climate policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 400-409.
    7. Moiseyev, Alexander & Solberg, Birger & Kallio, A. Maarit I., 2014. "The impact of subsidies and carbon pricing on the wood biomass use for energy in the EU," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 161-167.
    8. Zhang, Shuwei & Bauer, Nico & Yin, Guangzhi & Xie, Xi, 2020. "Technology learning and diffusion at the global and local scales: A modeling exercise in the REMIND model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Alice Favero & Robert Mendelsohn, 2013. "Evaluating the Global Role of Woody Biomass as a Mitigation Strategy," Working Papers 2013.37, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    10. Nikas, A. & Gambhir, A. & Trutnevyte, E. & Koasidis, K. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Mayer, D. & Zachmann, G. & Miguel, L.J. & Ferreras-Alonso, N. & Sognnaes, I. & Peters, G.P. & Colombo, E. & Howe, 2021. "Perspective of comprehensive and comprehensible multi-model energy and climate science in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    11. Brigitte Knopf, Ottmar Edenhofer, Christian Flachsland, Marcel T. J. Kok, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Gunnar Luderer, Alexander Popp, Detlef P. van Vuuren, 2010. "Managing the Low-Carbon Transition - From Model Results to Policies," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    12. Sferra, Fabio & Krapp, Mario & Roming, Niklas & Schaeffer, Michiel & Malik, Aman & Hare, Bill & Brecha, Robert, 2019. "Towards optimal 1.5° and 2 °C emission pathways for individual countries: A Finland case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Lee Branstetter & William Pizer, 2013. "Facing the Climate Change Challenge in a Global Economy," NBER Chapters, in: Globalization in an Age of Crisis: Multilateral Economic Cooperation in the Twenty-First Century, pages 215-250, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Michetti, Melania & Parrado, Ramiro, 2012. "Improving Land-use modelling within CGE to assess Forest-based Mitigation Potential and Costs," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 122862, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    15. Vicki Duscha & Katja Schumacher & Joachim Schleich & Pierre Buisson, 2014. "Costs of meeting international climate targets without nuclear power," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 327-352, May.
    16. Charlie Wilson & Arnulf Grubler, 2011. "Lessons from the history of technological change for clean energy scenarios and policies," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(3), pages 165-184, August.
    17. Misconel, S. & Leisen, R. & Mikurda, J. & Zimmermann, F. & Fraunholz, C. & Fichtner, W. & Möst, D. & Weber, C., 2022. "Systematic comparison of high-resolution electricity system modeling approaches focusing on investment, dispatch and generation adequacy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    18. Sandrine Selosse & Olivia Ricci & Sabine Garabedian & Govind Malhotra, 2014. "The decisive role of the carbon storage potential in the deployment of the CCS option," Post-Print hal-01103403, HAL.
    19. Matthias Weitzel, 2017. "The role of uncertainty in future costs of key CO2 abatement technologies: a sensitivity analysis with a global computable general equilibrium model," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 153-173, January.
    20. T. Gasser & C. Guivarch & K. Tachiiri & C. D. Jones & P. Ciais, 2015. "Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:45:y:2012:i:1:p:329-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.