IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v181y2019icp827-839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bulky waste for energy recovery: Analysis of spatial distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Šomplák, Radovan
  • Nevrlý, Vlastimír
  • Smejkalová, Veronika
  • Šmídová, Zlata
  • Pavlas, Martin

Abstract

The data regarding the current potential of unrecyclable waste and its spatial distribution play an essential role in the planning process. As per the circular economy strategies, especially the bulky waste streams suitable for energy recovery are to be identified. The public databases, however, collect data from a variety of sources (production and handling reports), which implies the presence of errors. This paper therefore proposes a multi-objective approach to identification and elimination of such errors to improve the accuracy of the assessment of potential energy recovery. The discussed model tracks the flow of waste from producers to processing nodes and minimises the deviation from the original data. Economic aspects are considered as well by preferring the shortest transport distance. The combination of data reconciliation and network flow enhances performance, as objective functions are solved separately, and only then the normalised individual optima are used in the multi-objective function. The model was tested using a Czech Republic regional-level dataset from 2015. A new perspective on the current state of waste management was provided, and valuable information for future planning was revealed, which can be useful for modelling of flows of other commodities.

Suggested Citation

  • Šomplák, Radovan & Nevrlý, Vlastimír & Smejkalová, Veronika & Šmídová, Zlata & Pavlas, Martin, 2019. "Bulky waste for energy recovery: Analysis of spatial distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 827-839.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:827-839
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219310576
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eskandarpour, Majid & Dejax, Pierre & Miemczyk, Joe & Péton, Olivier, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-32.
    2. Malinauskaite, J. & Jouhara, H. & Czajczyńska, D. & Stanchev, P. & Katsou, E. & Rostkowski, P. & Thorne, R.J. & Colón, J. & Ponsá, S. & Al-Mansour, F. & Anguilano, L. & Krzyżyńska, R. & López, I.C. & , 2017. "Municipal solid waste management and waste-to-energy in the context of a circular economy and energy recycling in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2013-2044.
    3. Korhonen, Jouni & Honkasalo, Antero & Seppälä, Jyri, 2018. "Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 37-46.
    4. Jiang, Xiaolong & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng, 2014. "Data reconciliation and gross error detection for operational data in power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 14-23.
    5. Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Jia, Xuexiu, 2018. "New directions in the implementation of Pinch Methodology (PM)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 439-468.
    6. Tabasová, Andrea & Kropáč, Jiří & Kermes, Vít & Nemet, Andreja & Stehlík, Petr, 2012. "Waste-to-energy technologies: Impact on environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 146-155.
    7. Jiang, Xiaolong & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng, 2014. "Gross error isolability for operational data in power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 918-927.
    8. Tomić, Tihomir & Dominković, Dominik Franjo & Pfeifer, Antun & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Pedersen, Allan Schrøder & Duić, Neven, 2017. "Waste to energy plant operation under the influence of market and legislation conditioned changes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1119-1129.
    9. Putna, Ondřej & Janošťák, František & Šomplák, Radovan & Pavlas, Martin, 2018. "Demand modelling in district heating systems within the conceptual design of a waste-to-energy plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1125-1139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Chao & Ju, Yanbing & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R. & Dong, Peiwu & Wang, Aihua, 2020. "The waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic Best-Worst method ANP and double parameters TOPSIS approach: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Jaroslav Pluskal & Radovan Šomplák & Dušan Hrabec & Vlastimír Nevrlý & Lars Magnus Hvattum, 2022. "Optimal location and operation of waste-to-energy plants when future waste composition is uncertain," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5765-5790, November.
    3. Ouyang, Tiancheng & Su, Zixiang & Yang, Rui & Wang, Zhiping & Mo, Xiaoyu & Huang, Haozhong, 2021. "Advanced waste heat harvesting strategy for marine dual-fuel engine considering gas-liquid two-phase flow of turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Halkos, George & Managi, Shunsuke, 2023. "New developments in the disciplines of environmental and resource economics," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 513-522.
    2. Hossein Nami & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam & Ahmad Arabkoohsar & Amir Reza Razmi, 2020. "4E Analyses of a Hybrid Waste-Driven CHP–ORC Plant with Flue Gas Condensation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Szega, Marcin, 2018. "Issues of an optimization of measurements location in redundant measurements systems of an energy conversion process – A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 1034-1047.
    4. Loyola-Fuentes, José & Smith, Robin, 2019. "Data reconciliation and gross error detection in crude oil pre-heat trains undergoing shell-side and tube-side fouling deposition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 368-384.
    5. Hrabec, Dušan & Šomplák, Radovan & Nevrlý, Vlastimír & Viktorin, Adam & Pluháček, Michal & Popela, Pavel, 2020. "Sustainable waste-to-energy facility location: Influence of demand on energy sales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Carmen Avilés-Palacios & Ana Rodríguez-Olalla, 2021. "The Sustainability of Waste Management Models in Circular Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Teng, Sin Yong & Máša, Vítězslav & Touš, Michal & Vondra, Marek & Lam, Hon Loong & Stehlík, Petr, 2022. "Waste-to-energy forecasting and real-time optimization: An anomaly-aware approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 142-155.
    8. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Yee Van Fan & Zorka Novak Pintarič & Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, 2020. "Emerging Tools for Energy System Design Increasing Economic and Environmental Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Du, Zhimin & Chen, Ling & Jin, Xinqiao, 2017. "Data-driven based reliability evaluation for measurements of sensors in a vapor compression system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 237-248.
    11. Yu, Jianxi & Han, Wenquan & Chen, Kang & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng, 2022. "Gross error detection in steam turbine measurements based on data reconciliation of inequality constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    12. Trang Thi Pham & Tsai-Chi Kuo & Ming-Lang Tseng & Raymond R. Tan & Kimhua Tan & Denny Satria Ika & Chiuhsiang Joe Lin, 2019. "Industry 4.0 to Accelerate the Circular Economy: A Case Study of Electric Scooter Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Rezaei, Mahdi & Ghobadian, Barat & Samadi, Seyed Hashem & Karimi, Samira, 2018. "Electric power generation from municipal solid waste: A techno-economical assessment under different scenarios in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 46-56.
    14. Guo, Sisi & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng, 2016. "Identification and isolability of multiple gross errors in measured data for power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 177-187.
    15. Omar Alhawari & Usama Awan & M. Khurrum S. Bhutta & M. Ali Ülkü, 2021. "Insights from Circular Economy Literature: A Review of Extant Definitions and Unravelling Paths to Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Wang, Yanhong & Cao, Lihua & Li, Xingcan & Wang, Jiaxing & Hu, Pengfei & Li, Bo & Li, Yong, 2020. "A novel thermodynamic method and insight of heat transfer characteristics on economizer for supercritical thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Yu, Jianxi & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng, 2021. "Data reconciliation of the thermal system of a double reheat power plant for thermal calculation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    19. Kůdela, Jakub & Smejkalová, Veronika & Šomplák, Radovan & Nevrlý, Vlastimír, 2020. "Legislation-induced planning of waste processing infrastructure: A case study of the Czech Republic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    20. Vazquez, Luis & Blanco, Jesús María & Ramis, Rolando & Peña, Francisco & Diaz, David, 2015. "Robust methodology for steady state measurements estimation based framework for a reliable long term thermal power plant operation performance monitoring," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 923-944.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:827-839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.