IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v160y2022ics096007792200409x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Precursors-driven machine learning prediction of chaotic extreme pulses in Kerr resonators

Author

Listed:
  • Coulibaly, Saliya
  • Bessin, Florent
  • Clerc, Marcel G.
  • Mussot, Arnaud

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms have opened a breach in the prediction's fortress of high-dimensional chaotic systems. Their ability to find hidden correlations in data can be exploited to perform model-free forecasting of spatiotemporal chaos and extreme events. However, the extensive feature of these evolutions makes up a critical limitation for full-size forecasting processes. Hence, the main challenge for forecasting relevant events is to establish the set of pertinent information. Here, we identify precursors from the transfer entropy of the system and a deep Long Short-Term Memory network to forecast the complex dynamics of a system evolving in a high-dimensional spatiotemporal chaotic regime. Performances of this triggerable model-free prediction protocol based on the information flowing map are tested from experimental data originating from a passive resonator operating in such a complex nonlinear regime. We have been able to predict the occurrence of extreme events up to 9 round trips after the detection of precursor, i.e., 3 times the horizon provided by Lyapunov exponents, with 92% of true positive predictions leading to 60% of accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Coulibaly, Saliya & Bessin, Florent & Clerc, Marcel G. & Mussot, Arnaud, 2022. "Precursors-driven machine learning prediction of chaotic extreme pulses in Kerr resonators," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:160:y:2022:i:c:s096007792200409x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096007792200409X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cai, David & McLaughlin, David W. & Shatah, Jalal, 2001. "Spatiotemporal chaos in spatially extended systems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 329-340.
    2. Anna D. Broido & Aaron Clauset, 2019. "Scale-free networks are rare," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Ghoddusi, Hamed & Creamer, Germán G. & Rafizadeh, Nima, 2019. "Machine learning in energy economics and finance: A review," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 709-727.
    4. Michael Wibral & Nicolae Pampu & Viola Priesemann & Felix Siebenhühner & Hannes Seiwert & Michael Lindner & Joseph T Lizier & Raul Vicente, 2013. "Measuring Information-Transfer Delays," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Yoo-Geun Ham & Jeong-Hwan Kim & Jing-Jia Luo, 2019. "Deep learning for multi-year ENSO forecasts," Nature, Nature, vol. 573(7775), pages 568-572, September.
    6. Fatimah Abdul Razak & Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen, 2014. "Quantifying ‘Causality’ in Complex Systems: Understanding Transfer Entropy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaogeng Wan & Lanxi Xu, 2018. "A study for multiscale information transfer measures based on conditional mutual information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-30, December.
    2. Jen-Yu Lee & Tien-Thinh Nguyen & Hong-Giang Nguyen & Jen-Yao Lee, 2022. "Towards Predictive Crude Oil Purchase: A Case Study in the USA and Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Yuquan Qu & Diego G. Miralles & Sander Veraverbeke & Harry Vereecken & Carsten Montzka, 2023. "Wildfire precursors show complementary predictability in different timescales," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Vincenzo Bianco & Annalisa Marchitto & Federico Scarpa & Luca A. Tagliafico, 2020. "Forecasting Energy Consumption in the EU Residential Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Martins, Francisco Leonardo Bezerra & do Nascimento, José Cláudio, 2022. "Power law dynamics in genealogical graphs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 596(C).
    6. Abdulelah Alkesaiberi & Fouzi Harrou & Ying Sun, 2022. "Efficient Wind Power Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods: A Comparative Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Fleming, Sean W., 2021. "Scale-free networks, 1/f dynamics, and nonlinear conflict size scaling from an agent-based simulation model of societal-scale bilateral conflict and cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 567(C).
    8. Stefania Corsaro & Valentina De Simone & Zelda Marino & Salvatore Scognamiglio, 2022. "l 1 -Regularization in Portfolio Selection with Machine Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Nguyen, Quyen & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Kuruppuarachchi, Duminda, 2021. "Predicting corporate carbon footprints for climate finance risk analyses: A machine learning approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Irving O Morales & Emmanuel Landa & Carlos Calderon Angeles & Juan C Toledo & Ana Leonor Rivera & Joel Mendoza Temis & Alejandro Frank, 2015. "Behavior of Early Warnings near the Critical Temperature in the Two-Dimensional Ising Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Wu, Binrong & Wang, Lin & Wang, Sirui & Zeng, Yu-Rong, 2021. "Forecasting the U.S. oil markets based on social media information during the COVID-19 pandemic," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. David L Gibbs & Ilya Shmulevich, 2017. "Solving the influence maximization problem reveals regulatory organization of the yeast cell cycle," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Ethem Çanakoğlu & Esra Adıyeke, 2020. "Comparison of Electricity Spot Price Modelling and Risk Management Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Simon Blöthner & Mario Larch, 2022. "Economic determinants of regional trade agreements revisited using machine learning," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1771-1807, October.
    15. Roman V. Klyuev & Irbek D. Morgoev & Angelika D. Morgoeva & Oksana A. Gavrina & Nikita V. Martyushev & Egor A. Efremenkov & Qi Mengxu, 2022. "Methods of Forecasting Electric Energy Consumption: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-33, November.
    16. Lukasz Mach & Dariusz Zmarzly & Ireneusz Dabrowski & Pawel Fracz, 2020. "Comparison on Subannual Seasonality of Building Construction in European Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 241-257.
    17. D'Acci, Luca S., 2023. "Is housing price distribution across cities, scale invariant? Fractal distribution of settlements' house prices as signature of self-organized complexity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Yongtong Shao & Tao Xiong & Minghao Li & Dermot Hayes & Wendong Zhang & Wei Xie, 2021. "China's Missing Pigs: Correcting China's Hog Inventory Data Using a Machine Learning Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 1082-1098, May.
    19. Meng, Xiangyi & Zhou, Bin, 2023. "Scale-free networks beyond power-law degree distribution," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. Angeliki Papana & Catherine Kyrtsou & Dimitris Kugiumtzis & Cees Diks, 2017. "Assessment of resampling methods for causality testing: A note on the US inflation behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:160:y:2022:i:c:s096007792200409x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.