IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v228y2018icp1669-1682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy and exergy analysis of concentrated solar supercritical water gasification of algal biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Rahbari, Alireza
  • Venkataraman, Mahesh B.
  • Pye, John

Abstract

Solar supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of biomass has attractive advantages for liquid fuel production, but only very few system-level concepts have so far been investigated. Here, a solar SCWG reactor is integrated with a downstream solar reforming reactor and a supplementary hydrogen supply (assumed from photovoltaic-powered electrolysis), to produce syngas at the H2:CO ratio required for liquid fuels synthesis. Three alternative reforming reactor options are considered. The overall process, excluding the liquid synthesis, is modelled as a steady-state process in Aspen Plus, with detailed heat transfer modelling for most process units. Reactors are modelled as idealised equilibrium reactors, due to the absence of kinetics data in the case of SCWG. Optimal process parameters are determined through parameter studies: algae concentration should be high (25% by mass, at the limit of pumping), as should the SCWG reactor temperature (605 °C, within pipework material limits, at 24 MPa pressure) and reformer temperature (1050 °C in the case of steam methane reforming). Overall exergy efficiency declines strongly at reduced algae concentrations, since lower concentrations necessitate greater recirculation of water, and cause consequently higher exergy destruction in heat exchangers and separators. Char production is another factor that greatly affects process efficiency, and the lack of good models and data mean that further work is required to understand and control this factor. Alternative reformer options (steam methane reforming, autothermal reforming and partial oxidation/dry reforming) had negligible affect on the overall process carbon, exergy or energy efficiency (88%, 71% and 45%, respectively, at the optimal design point), but greatly affected the amount of H2 required from the supplementary photovoltaic-electrolysis system. This tradeoff offers interesting design choices for hybridised solar-thermal/photovoltaic solar-fuel systems, which should be the topic of future technoeconomic analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahbari, Alireza & Venkataraman, Mahesh B. & Pye, John, 2018. "Energy and exergy analysis of concentrated solar supercritical water gasification of algal biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1669-1682.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:228:y:2018:i:c:p:1669-1682
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918310298
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lipman, Timothy & Edwards, Jennifer Lynn & Brooks, Cameron, 2006. "Renewable Hydrogen: Technology Review and Policy Recommendations for State-Level Sustainable Energy Futures," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt48w7f7z2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Darmawan, Arif & Ajiwibowo, Muhammad W. & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Aziz, Muhammad & Tokimatsu, Koji, 2018. "Energy-efficient recovery of black liquor through gasification and syngas chemical looping," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 290-298.
    3. Onursal Yakaboylu & John Harinck & K. G. Smit & Wiebren De Jong, 2015. "Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass: A Literature and Technology Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-36, January.
    4. Ho, Clifford K. & Iverson, Brian D., 2014. "Review of high-temperature central receiver designs for concentrating solar power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 835-846.
    5. Aziz, Muhammad & Oda, Takuya & Kashiwagi, Takao, 2014. "Integration of energy-efficient drying in microalgae utilization based on enhanced process integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 307-316.
    6. Cao, Changqing & Guo, Liejin & Jin, Hui & Cao, Wen & Jia, Yi & Yao, Xiangdong, 2017. "System analysis of pulping process coupled with supercritical water gasification of black liquor for combined hydrogen, heat and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 238-247.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hajizadeh, Abdollah & Mohamadi-Baghmolaei, Mohamad & Cata Saady, Noori M. & Zendehboudi, Sohrab, 2022. "Hydrogen production from biomass through integration of anaerobic digestion and biogas dry reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    2. Rahbari, Alireza & Shirazi, Alec & Venkataraman, Mahesh B. & Pye, John, 2021. "Solar fuels from supercritical water gasification of algae: Impacts of low-cost hydrogen on reformer configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    3. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Lin, Yu-Ying & Liu, Hsuah-Cheng & Chen, Teng-Chien & Hung, Chun-Hung & Chen, Chi-Hui & Ong, Hwai Chyuan, 2019. "A comprehensive analysis of food waste derived liquefaction bio-oil properties for industrial application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 283-291.
    4. Fürsatz, K. & Fuchs, J. & Benedikt, F. & Kuba, M. & Hofbauer, H., 2021. "Effect of biomass fuel ash and bed material on the product gas composition in DFB steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. Chen, Jingwei & Huang, Yizhen & Liu, Yang & Jiaqiang, E., 2024. "System development and thermodynamic performance analysis of a system integrating supercritical water gasification of black liquor with direct-reduced iron process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    6. Ayala-Cortés, Alejandro & Arcelus-Arrillaga, Pedro & Millan, Marcos & Arancibia-Bulnes, Camilo A. & Valadés-Pelayo, Patricio J. & Villafán-Vidales, Heidi Isabel, 2021. "Solar integrated hydrothermal processes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Guo, Shenghui & Wang, Yu & Shang, Fei & Yi, Lei & Chen, Yunan & Chen, Bin & Guo, Liejin, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis of the series system for the supercritical water gasification of coal-water slurry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    8. Adnan, Muflih A. & Hossain, Mohammad M. & Golam Kibria, Md, 2022. "Converting waste into fuel via integrated thermal and electrochemical routes: An analysis of thermodynamic approach on thermal conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    9. Peng, Zhiyong & Xu, Jialing & Rong, Siqi & Luo, Kui & Lu, Libo & Jin, Hui & Zhao, Qiuyang & Guo, Liejin, 2023. "Thermodynamic and environmental analysis for multi-component supercritical thermal fluid generation by supercritical water gasification of oilfield wastewater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Qi, Xingang & Ren, Zhenhua & Meng, Fanrui & Lu, Libo & Liu, Fan & Li, Xunjun & Jin, Hui & Chen, Yunan & Guo, Liejin, 2024. "Thermodynamic and environmental analysis of an integrated multi-effect evaporation and organic wastewater supercritical water gasification system for hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    11. Jin Wu & Jiangjiang Wang & Jing Wu & Chaofan Ma, 2019. "Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analysis of a Combined Cooling, Heating, and Power System Based on Solar Thermal Biomass Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Adnan, Muflih A. & Xiong, Qingang & Muraza, Oki & Hossain, Mohammad M., 2020. "Gasification of wet microalgae to produce H2-rich syngas and electricity: A thermodynamic study considering exergy analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2195-2205.
    13. Wang, Jiangjiang & Ma, Chaofan & Wu, Jing, 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power system based on solar thermal biomass gasification☆," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 102-115.
    14. Qi, Xingang & Chen, Yunan & Zhao, Jiuyun & Su, Di & Liu, Fan & Lu, Libo & Jin, Hui & Guo, Liejin, 2023. "Thermodynamic and environmental assessment of black liquor supercritical water gasification integrated online salt recovery polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    15. Adnan, Muflih A. & Hossain, Mohammad M. & Kibria, Md Golam, 2020. "Biomass upgrading to high-value chemicals via gasification and electrolysis: A thermodynamic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1367-1379.
    16. Ruya, Petric Marc & Lim, Siew Shee & Purwadi, Ronny & Zunita, Megawati, 2020. "Sustainable hydrogen production from oil palm derived wastes through autothermal operation of supercritical water gasification system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    17. Fang, Juan & Liu, Qibin & Guo, Shaopeng & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2019. "Spanning solar spectrum: A combined photochemical and thermochemical process for solar energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 116-126.
    18. Sanaye, Sepehr & Alizadeh, Pouria & Yazdani, Mohsen, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis of syngas production from wet digested sewage sludge by gasification process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 524-539.
    19. Kakati, Ujjiban & Sakhiya, Anil Kumar & Baghel, Paramjeet & Trada, Akshit & Mahapatra, Sadhan & Upadhyay, Darshit & Kaushal, Priyanka, 2022. "Sustainable utilization of bamboo through air-steam gasification in downdraft gasifier: Experimental and simulation approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    20. Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki, Mahmood & Dalvi-Isfahan, Mohsen, 2024. "Multiple exegetically optimization of ultrasonic pretreatment and substrate mixture for biohydrogen and biomethane improvement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    21. Li, Jie & Suvarna, Manu & Pan, Lanjia & Zhao, Yingru & Wang, Xiaonan, 2021. "A hybrid data-driven and mechanistic modelling approach for hydrothermal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    22. Yiru Zhao & Nathalie Bourgougnon & Jean-Louis Lanoisellé & Thomas Lendormi, 2022. "Biofuel Production from Seaweeds: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-34, December.
    23. Kasaeian, Alibakhsh & Hadavi, Hamed & Amirhaeri, Yasaman & Pourfayaz, Fathollah, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of a wood chips-based cycle integrated with solid oxide fuel cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1174-1193.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurdiawati, Anissa & Zaini, Ilman Nuran & Irhamna, Adrian Rizqi & Sasongko, Dwiwahju & Aziz, Muhammad, 2019. "Novel configuration of supercritical water gasification and chemical looping for highly-efficient hydrogen production from microalgae," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 369-381.
    2. Özdenkçi, Karhan & Prestipino, Mauro & Björklund-Sänkiaho, Margareta & Galvagno, Antonio & De Blasio, Cataldo, 2020. "Alternative energy valorization routes of black liquor by stepwise supercritical water gasification: Effect of process parameters on hydrogen yield and energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Darmawan, Arif & Ajiwibowo, Muhammad W. & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Aziz, Muhammad & Tokimatsu, Koji, 2018. "Energy-efficient recovery of black liquor through gasification and syngas chemical looping," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 290-298.
    4. Darmawan, Arif & Ajiwibowo, Muhammad W. & Biddinika, Muhammad Kunta & Tokimatsu, Koji & Aziz, Muhammad, 2019. "Black liquor-based hydrogen and power co-production: Combination of supercritical water gasification and syngas chemical looping," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Okoroigwe, Edmund & Madhlopa, Amos, 2016. "An integrated combined cycle system driven by a solar tower: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 337-350.
    6. Pitot de la Beaujardiere, Jean-Francois P. & Reuter, Hanno C.R., 2018. "A review of performance modelling studies associated with open volumetric receiver CSP plant technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3848-3862.
    7. Juangsa, Firman Bagja & Prananto, Lukman Adi & Mufrodi, Zahrul & Budiman, Arief & Oda, Takuya & Aziz, Muhammad, 2018. "Highly energy-efficient combination of dehydrogenation of methylcyclohexane and hydrogen-based power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 31-38.
    8. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    9. Setyawan, M. Ismail Bagus & Dafiqurrohman, Hafif & Akbar, Maha Hidayatullah & Surjosatyo, Adi, 2021. "Characterizing a two-stage downdraft biomass gasifier using a representative particle model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 750-767.
    10. Mostafavi Tehrani, S. Saeed & Taylor, Robert A., 2016. "Off-design simulation and performance of molten salt cavity receivers in solar tower plants under realistic operational modes and control strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 698-715.
    11. Mohamed Magdeldin & Thomas Kohl & Cataldo De Blasio & Mika Järvinen & Song Won Park & Reinaldo Giudici, 2016. "The BioSCWG Project: Understanding the Trade-Offs in the Process and Thermal Design of Hydrogen and Synthetic Natural Gas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Roldán, M.I. & Fernández-Reche, J. & Ballestrín, J., 2016. "Computational fluid dynamics evaluation of the operating conditions for a volumetric receiver installed in a solar tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 844-856.
    13. Ma, Xiaojing & Xu, Jinliang & Xie, Jian, 2021. "In-situ phase separation to improve phase change heat transfer performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Xu, Jialing & Rong, Siqi & Sun, Jingli & Peng, Zhiyong & Jin, Hui & Guo, Liejin & Zhang, Xiang & Zhou, Teng, 2022. "Optimal design of non-isothermal supercritical water gasification reactor: From biomass to hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    15. Fernández, Angel G. & Gomez-Vidal, Judith & Oró, Eduard & Kruizenga, Alan & Solé, Aran & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2019. "Mainstreaming commercial CSP systems: A technology review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 152-176.
    16. Matthew L. Bauer, 2022. "De-Risking Solar Receivers to Achieve SunShot Targets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Fornarelli, Francesco & Camporeale, Sergio & Asfand, Faisal & Gillard, Jonathon & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis, optimisation and systematic integration of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle with sensible heat thermal energy storage for CSP application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    18. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    19. Cataldo De Blasio & Gabriel Salierno & Andrea Magnano, 2021. "Implications on Feedstock Processing and Safety Issues for Semi-Batch Operations in Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Qiu, Yu & Zhang, Yuwen, 2016. "A novel integrated simulation approach couples MCRT and Gebhart methods to simulate solar radiation transfer in a solar power tower system with a cavity receiver," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 93-107.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:228:y:2018:i:c:p:1669-1682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.