IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2015i2p859-894d45183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass: A Literature and Technology Overview

Author

Listed:
  • Onursal Yakaboylu

    (Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Process and Energy Department, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, NL-2628 CA Delft, The Netherlands)

  • John Harinck

    (Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Process and Energy Department, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, NL-2628 CA Delft, The Netherlands
    Gensos B.V., Wijdenes Spaansweg 57, NL-1764 GK Breezand, The Netherlands)

  • K. G. Smit

    (Gensos B.V., Wijdenes Spaansweg 57, NL-1764 GK Breezand, The Netherlands)

  • Wiebren De Jong

    (Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Process and Energy Department, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, NL-2628 CA Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The supercritical water gasification process is an alternative to both conventional gasification as well as anaerobic digestion as it does not require drying and the process takes place at much shorter residence times; a few minutes at most. The drastic changes in the thermo-physical properties of water from the liquid state to the supercritical state make it a promising technology for the efficient conversion of wet biomass into a product gas that after upgrading can be used as substitute natural gas. The earliest research goes back as far as the 1970s and since then, supercritical water has been the subject of many research works in the field of thermochemical conversion of wet biomass. This article reviews the state of the art of the supercritical water gasification technology starting from the thermophysical properties of water and the chemistry of reactions to the process challenges of such a biomass based supercritical water gasification process plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Onursal Yakaboylu & John Harinck & K. G. Smit & Wiebren De Jong, 2015. "Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass: A Literature and Technology Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-36, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:2:p:859-894:d:45183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/2/859/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/2/859/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yildiz Bircan, Sevgihan & Kamoshita, Humihiko & Kanamori, Ryuichi & Ishida, Yasuyuki & Matsumoto, Kozo & Hasegawa, Yutaka & Kitagawa, Kuniyuki, 2011. "Behavior of heteroatom compounds in hydrothermal gasification of biowaste for hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4874-4878.
    2. R. D. Cortright & R. R. Davda & J. A. Dumesic, 2002. "Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6901), pages 964-967, August.
    3. Guo, Y. & Wang, S.Z. & Xu, D.H. & Gong, Y.M. & Ma, H.H. & Tang, X.Y., 2010. "Review of catalytic supercritical water gasification for hydrogen production from biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 334-343, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Özdenkçi, Karhan & De Blasio, Cataldo & Sarwar, Golam & Melin, Kristian & Koskinen, Jukka & Alopaeus, Ville, 2019. "Techno-economic feasibility of supercritical water gasification of black liquor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Daniele Castello & Birgit Rolli & Andrea Kruse & Luca Fiori, 2017. "Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass in a Ceramic Reactor: Long-Time Batch Experiments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Guo, Shaopeng & Liu, Qibin & Sun, Jie & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "A review on the utilization of hybrid renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1121-1147.
    4. Wang, Cui & Zhu, Chao & Huang, Jianbing & Li, Linfeng & Jin, Hui, 2021. "Enhancement of depolymerization slag gasification in supercritical water and its gasification performance in fluidized bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 829-837.
    5. Shahbeik, Hossein & Peng, Wanxi & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dehhaghi, Mona & Guillemin, Gilles J. & Fallahi, Alireza & Amiri, Hamid & Rehan, Mohammad & Raikwar, Deepak & Latine, Hannes & Pandalon, 2022. "Synthesis of liquid biofuels from biomass by hydrothermal gasification: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Cataldo De Blasio & Gabriel Salierno & Andrea Magnano, 2021. "Implications on Feedstock Processing and Safety Issues for Semi-Batch Operations in Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    8. Rahbari, Alireza & Shirazi, Alec & Venkataraman, Mahesh B. & Pye, John, 2021. "Solar fuels from supercritical water gasification of algae: Impacts of low-cost hydrogen on reformer configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    9. Blair, M. Jean & Mabee, Warren E., 2020. "Evaluation of technology, economics and emissions impacts of community-scale bioenergy systems for a forest-based community in Ontario," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 715-730.
    10. Okolie, Jude A. & Nanda, Sonil & Dalai, Ajay K. & Berruti, Franco & Kozinski, Janusz A., 2020. "A review on subcritical and supercritical water gasification of biogenic, polymeric and petroleum wastes to hydrogen-rich synthesis gas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Mohamed Magdeldin & Thomas Kohl & Cataldo De Blasio & Mika Järvinen & Song Won Park & Reinaldo Giudici, 2016. "The BioSCWG Project: Understanding the Trade-Offs in the Process and Thermal Design of Hydrogen and Synthetic Natural Gas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-27, October.
    12. De Blasio, Cataldo & De Gisi, Sabino & Molino, Antonio & Simonetti, Marco & Santarelli, Massimo & Björklund-Sänkiaho, Margareta, 2019. "Concerning operational aspects in supercritical water gasification of kraft black liquor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 891-901.
    13. Liang Meng & Ahmed Alengebawy & Ping Ai & Keda Jin & Mengdi Chen & Yulong Pan, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Three Modes of Large-Scale Crop Residue Utilization Projects in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Rahbari, Alireza & Venkataraman, Mahesh B. & Pye, John, 2018. "Energy and exergy analysis of concentrated solar supercritical water gasification of algal biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1669-1682.
    15. Hu, Yulin & Gong, Mengyue & Xing, Xuelian & Wang, Haoyu & Zeng, Yimin & Xu, Chunbao Charles, 2020. "Supercritical water gasification of biomass model compounds: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    16. Ramin Azargohar & Sonil Nanda & He Cheng & Ajay K. Dalai, 2022. "Potential Application of Canola Hull Fuel Pellets for the Production of Synthesis Gas and Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Cao, Changqing & Xie, Yupeng & Mao, Liuhao & Wei, Wenwen & Shi, Jinwen & Jin, Hui, 2020. "Hydrogen production from supercritical water gasification of soda black liquor with various metal oxides," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 24-32.
    18. Özdenkçi, Karhan & Prestipino, Mauro & Björklund-Sänkiaho, Margareta & Galvagno, Antonio & De Blasio, Cataldo, 2020. "Alternative energy valorization routes of black liquor by stepwise supercritical water gasification: Effect of process parameters on hydrogen yield and energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Alessio Siciliano & Carlo Limonti & Sanjeet Mehariya & Antonio Molino & Vincenza Calabrò, 2018. "Biofuel Production and Phosphorus Recovery through an Integrated Treatment of Agro-Industrial Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Julian Dutzi & Nikolaos Boukis & Jörg Sauer, 2023. "Energetic Assessment of SCWG Experiments with Reed Canary Grass and Ethanol Solution on Laboratory and Pilot Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    21. Nurdiawati, Anissa & Zaini, Ilman Nuran & Irhamna, Adrian Rizqi & Sasongko, Dwiwahju & Aziz, Muhammad, 2019. "Novel configuration of supercritical water gasification and chemical looping for highly-efficient hydrogen production from microalgae," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 369-381.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Su, Hongcai & Yan, Mi & Wang, Shurong, 2022. "Recent advances in supercritical water gasification of biowaste catalyzed by transition metal-based catalysts for hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Ane Caroline Pereira Borges & Jude Azubuike Onwudili & Heloysa Andrade & Carine Alves & Andrew Ingram & Silvio Vieira de Melo & Ednildo Torres, 2020. "Catalytic Properties and Recycling of NiFe 2 O 4 Catalyst for Hydrogen Production by Supercritical Water Gasification of Eucalyptus Wood Chips," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
    3. He, Chao & Chen, Chia-Lung & Giannis, Apostolos & Yang, Yanhui & Wang, Jing-Yuan, 2014. "Hydrothermal gasification of sewage sludge and model compounds for renewable hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1127-1142.
    4. Tekin, Kubilay & Karagöz, Selhan & Bektaş, Sema, 2014. "A review of hydrothermal biomass processing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 673-687.
    5. Özdenkçi, Karhan & Prestipino, Mauro & Björklund-Sänkiaho, Margareta & Galvagno, Antonio & De Blasio, Cataldo, 2020. "Alternative energy valorization routes of black liquor by stepwise supercritical water gasification: Effect of process parameters on hydrogen yield and energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    7. Hrnčič, Maša Knez & Kravanja, Gregor & Knez, Željko, 2016. "Hydrothermal treatment of biomass for energy and chemicals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P2), pages 1312-1322.
    8. Gutiérrez Ortiz, F.J. & Serrera, A. & Galera, S. & Ollero, P., 2013. "Experimental study of the supercritical water reforming of glycerol without the addition of a catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 193-206.
    9. Schwengber, Carine Aline & Alves, Helton José & Schaffner, Rodolfo Andrade & da Silva, Fernando Alves & Sequinel, Rodrigo & Bach, Vanessa Rossato & Ferracin, Ricardo José, 2016. "Overview of glycerol reforming for hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 259-266.
    10. Yevheniia Ziabina & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2020. "The Green Deal Policy for Renewable Energy: A Bibliometric Analysis," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 3(4), pages 147-168, October.
    11. Jin, Gong & Iwaki, Hiroyuki & Arai, Norio & Kitagawa, Kuniyuki, 2005. "Study on the gasification of wastepaper/carbon dioxide catalyzed by molten carbonate salts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1192-1203.
    12. Pasquale Iannotta & Giuseppe Caputo & Francesca Scargiali & Sonia Longo & Maurizio Cellura & Alberto Brucato, 2020. "Combined Gasification-Oxidation System for Waste Treatment with Supercritical Water: LCA and Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Samiee-Zafarghandi, Roudabeh & Karimi-Sabet, Javad & Abdoli, Mohammad Ali & Karbassi, Abdolreza, 2018. "Supercritical water gasification of microalga Chlorella PTCC 6010 for hydrogen production: Box-Behnken optimization and evaluating catalytic effect of MnO2/SiO2 and NiO/SiO2," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 189-201.
    14. Feng, Junfeng & Yang, Zhongzhi & Hse, Chung-yun & Su, Qiuli & Wang, Kui & Jiang, Jianchun & Xu, Junming, 2017. "In situ catalytic hydrogenation of model compounds and biomass-derived phenolic compounds for bio-oil upgrading," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 140-148.
    15. Maity, Sunil K., 2015. "Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part II," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1446-1466.
    16. Lin, Junhao & Sun, Shichang & Cui, Chongwei & Ma, Rui & Fang, Lin & Zhang, Peixin & Quan, Zonggang & Song, Xin & Yan, Jianglong & Luo, Juan, 2019. "Hydrogen-rich bio-gas generation and optimization in relation to heavy metals immobilization during Pd-catalyzed supercritical water gasification of sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Meryemoğlu, Bahar & Hasanoğlu, Arif & Kaya, Burçak & Irmak, Sibel & Erbatur, Oktay, 2014. "Hydrogen production from aqueous-phase reforming of sorghum biomass: An application of the response surface methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 535-541.
    18. Saba, N. & Jawaid, M. & Hakeem, K.R. & Paridah, M.T. & Khalina, A. & Alothman, O.Y., 2015. "Potential of bioenergy production from industrial kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) based on Malaysian perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 446-459.
    19. Lei Yi & Jingwei Chen & Zhigang Liu & Huiming Chen & Daoxiu Liu & Zheng Liu & Bin Chen, 2022. "Study on Hydrogen Production by Supercritical Water Gasification of Unsymmetrical Dimethylhydrazine under Multi-Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-11, September.
    20. Aubaid Ullah & Nur Awanis Hashim & Mohamad Fairus Rabuni & Mohd Usman Mohd Junaidi, 2023. "A Review on Methanol as a Clean Energy Carrier: Roles of Zeolite in Improving Production Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:2:p:859-894:d:45183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.