IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v9y2016i10p838-d80785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The BioSCWG Project: Understanding the Trade-Offs in the Process and Thermal Design of Hydrogen and Synthetic Natural Gas Production

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Magdeldin

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto FI-00076, Finland)

  • Thomas Kohl

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto FI-00076, Finland)

  • Cataldo De Blasio

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto FI-00076, Finland
    Department of Chemical Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, Turku 20500, Finland)

  • Mika Järvinen

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto FI-00076, Finland)

  • Song Won Park

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Reinaldo Giudici

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

Abstract

This article presents a summary of the main findings from a collaborative research project between Aalto University in Finland and partner universities. A comparative process synthesis, modelling and thermal assessment was conducted for the production of Bio-synthetic natural gas (SNG) and hydrogen from supercritical water refining of a lipid extracted algae feedstock integrated with onsite heat and power generation. The developed reactor models for product gas composition, yield and thermal demand were validated and showed conformity with reported experimental results, and the balance of plant units were designed based on established technologies or state-of-the-art pilot operations. The poly-generative cases illustrated the thermo-chemical constraints and design trade-offs presented by key process parameters such as plant organic throughput, supercritical water refining temperature, nature of desirable coproducts, downstream indirect production and heat recovery scenarios. The evaluated cases favoring hydrogen production at 5 wt. % solid content and 600 °C conversion temperature allowed higher gross syngas and CHP production. However, mainly due to the higher utility demands the net syngas production remained lower compared to the cases favoring BioSNG production. The latter case, at 450 °C reactor temperature, 18 wt. % solid content and presence of downstream indirect production recorded 66.5%, 66.2% and 57.2% energetic, fuel-equivalent and exergetic efficiencies respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Magdeldin & Thomas Kohl & Cataldo De Blasio & Mika Järvinen & Song Won Park & Reinaldo Giudici, 2016. "The BioSCWG Project: Understanding the Trade-Offs in the Process and Thermal Design of Hydrogen and Synthetic Natural Gas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:10:p:838-:d:80785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/10/838/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/10/838/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Onursal Yakaboylu & John Harinck & K. G. Smit & Wiebren De Jong, 2015. "Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass: A Literature and Technology Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-36, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chia-Nan Wang & Min-Tsong Chou & Hsien-Pin Hsu & Jing-Wein Wang & Sridhar Selvaraj, 2017. "The Efficiency Improvement by Combining HHO Gas, Coal and Oil in Boiler for Electricity Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Bareschino, P. & Mancusi, E. & Tregambi, C. & Pepe, F. & Urciuolo, M. & Brachi, P. & Ruoppolo, G., 2021. "Integration of biomasses gasification and renewable-energies-driven water electrolysis for methane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Granacher, Julia & Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Castro-Amoedo, Rafael & Maréchal, François, 2022. "Overcoming decision paralysis—A digital twin for decision making in energy system design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    4. De Blasio, Cataldo & De Gisi, Sabino & Molino, Antonio & Simonetti, Marco & Santarelli, Massimo & Björklund-Sänkiaho, Margareta, 2019. "Concerning operational aspects in supercritical water gasification of kraft black liquor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 891-901.
    5. Vincenzo Palma & Concetta Ruocco & Eugenio Meloni & Antonio Ricca, 2017. "Influence of Catalytic Formulation and Operative Conditions on Coke Deposition over CeO 2 -SiO 2 Based Catalysts for Ethanol Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Beatrice Castellani & Alberto Maria Gambelli & Elena Morini & Benedetto Nastasi & Andrea Presciutti & Mirko Filipponi & Andrea Nicolini & Federico Rossi, 2017. "Experimental Investigation on CO 2 Methanation Process for Solar Energy Storage Compared to CO 2 -Based Methanol Synthesis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Magdeldin, Mohamed & Kohl, Thomas & Järvinen, Mika, 2017. "Techno-economic assessment of the by-products contribution from non-catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of lignocellulose residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 679-695.
    8. Magdeldin, Mohamed & Järvinen, Mika, 2020. "Supercritical water gasification of Kraft black liquor: Process design, analysis, pulp mill integration and economic evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    9. Qi, Xingang & Li, Xujun & Liu, Fan & Lu, Libo & Jin, Hui & Wei, Wenwen & Chen, Yunan & Guo, Liejin, 2023. "Hydrogen production by kraft black liquor supercritical water gasification: Reaction pathway and kinetic," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    10. Nurdiawati, Anissa & Zaini, Ilman Nuran & Irhamna, Adrian Rizqi & Sasongko, Dwiwahju & Aziz, Muhammad, 2019. "Novel configuration of supercritical water gasification and chemical looping for highly-efficient hydrogen production from microalgae," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 369-381.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    2. Cataldo De Blasio & Gabriel Salierno & Andrea Magnano, 2021. "Implications on Feedstock Processing and Safety Issues for Semi-Batch Operations in Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Hu, Yulin & Gong, Mengyue & Xing, Xuelian & Wang, Haoyu & Zeng, Yimin & Xu, Chunbao Charles, 2020. "Supercritical water gasification of biomass model compounds: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Rahbari, Alireza & Venkataraman, Mahesh B. & Pye, John, 2018. "Energy and exergy analysis of concentrated solar supercritical water gasification of algal biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1669-1682.
    5. Wang, Cui & Zhu, Chao & Huang, Jianbing & Li, Linfeng & Jin, Hui, 2021. "Enhancement of depolymerization slag gasification in supercritical water and its gasification performance in fluidized bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 829-837.
    6. De Blasio, Cataldo & De Gisi, Sabino & Molino, Antonio & Simonetti, Marco & Santarelli, Massimo & Björklund-Sänkiaho, Margareta, 2019. "Concerning operational aspects in supercritical water gasification of kraft black liquor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 891-901.
    7. Okolie, Jude A. & Nanda, Sonil & Dalai, Ajay K. & Berruti, Franco & Kozinski, Janusz A., 2020. "A review on subcritical and supercritical water gasification of biogenic, polymeric and petroleum wastes to hydrogen-rich synthesis gas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Özdenkçi, Karhan & De Blasio, Cataldo & Sarwar, Golam & Melin, Kristian & Koskinen, Jukka & Alopaeus, Ville, 2019. "Techno-economic feasibility of supercritical water gasification of black liquor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    9. Rahbari, Alireza & Shirazi, Alec & Venkataraman, Mahesh B. & Pye, John, 2021. "Solar fuels from supercritical water gasification of algae: Impacts of low-cost hydrogen on reformer configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    10. Alessio Siciliano & Carlo Limonti & Sanjeet Mehariya & Antonio Molino & Vincenza Calabrò, 2018. "Biofuel Production and Phosphorus Recovery through an Integrated Treatment of Agro-Industrial Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Nurdiawati, Anissa & Zaini, Ilman Nuran & Irhamna, Adrian Rizqi & Sasongko, Dwiwahju & Aziz, Muhammad, 2019. "Novel configuration of supercritical water gasification and chemical looping for highly-efficient hydrogen production from microalgae," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 369-381.
    12. Shahbeik, Hossein & Peng, Wanxi & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dehhaghi, Mona & Guillemin, Gilles J. & Fallahi, Alireza & Amiri, Hamid & Rehan, Mohammad & Raikwar, Deepak & Latine, Hannes & Pandalon, 2022. "Synthesis of liquid biofuels from biomass by hydrothermal gasification: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Cao, Changqing & Xie, Yupeng & Mao, Liuhao & Wei, Wenwen & Shi, Jinwen & Jin, Hui, 2020. "Hydrogen production from supercritical water gasification of soda black liquor with various metal oxides," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 24-32.
    14. Julian Dutzi & Nikolaos Boukis & Jörg Sauer, 2023. "Energetic Assessment of SCWG Experiments with Reed Canary Grass and Ethanol Solution on Laboratory and Pilot Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Blair, M. Jean & Mabee, Warren E., 2020. "Evaluation of technology, economics and emissions impacts of community-scale bioenergy systems for a forest-based community in Ontario," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 715-730.
    16. Özdenkçi, Karhan & Prestipino, Mauro & Björklund-Sänkiaho, Margareta & Galvagno, Antonio & De Blasio, Cataldo, 2020. "Alternative energy valorization routes of black liquor by stepwise supercritical water gasification: Effect of process parameters on hydrogen yield and energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Guo, Shaopeng & Liu, Qibin & Sun, Jie & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "A review on the utilization of hybrid renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1121-1147.
    18. Ramin Azargohar & Sonil Nanda & He Cheng & Ajay K. Dalai, 2022. "Potential Application of Canola Hull Fuel Pellets for the Production of Synthesis Gas and Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Liang Meng & Ahmed Alengebawy & Ping Ai & Keda Jin & Mengdi Chen & Yulong Pan, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Three Modes of Large-Scale Crop Residue Utilization Projects in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Daniele Castello & Birgit Rolli & Andrea Kruse & Luca Fiori, 2017. "Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass in a Ceramic Reactor: Long-Time Batch Experiments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:10:p:838-:d:80785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.