IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v103y2013icp61-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: Batch and continuous operation

Author

Listed:
  • Kafle, Gopi Krishna
  • Kim, Sang Hun

Abstract

This study evaluated the performance of anaerobic digesters using a mixture of apple waste (AW) and swine manure (SM). Tests were performed using both batch and continuous digesters. The batch test evaluated the gas potential, gas production rate of the AW and SM (Experiment I), and the effect of AW co-digestion with SM (33:67,% volatile solids (VSs) basis) (Experiment II) at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. The first-order kinetic model and modified Gompertz model were also evaluated for methane yield. The continuous test evaluated the performance of a single stage completely stirred tank reactor (CSTR) with different mixture ratios of AW and SM at mesophilic temperature. The ultimate biogas and methane productivity of AW in terms of total chemical oxygen demand (TCOD) was determined to be 510 and 252mL/g TCOD added, respectively. The mixture of AW and SM improved the biogas yield by approximately 16% and 48% at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures, respectively, compared to the use of SM only, but no significant difference was found in the methane yield. The difference between the predicted and measured methane yield was higher with a first order kinetic model (4.6–18.1%) than with a modified Gompertz model (1.2–3.4%). When testing continuous digestion, the methane yield increased from 146 to 190mL/g TCOD added when the AW content in the feed was increased from 25% to 33% (VS basis) at a constant organic loading rate (OLR) of 1.6g VS/L/d and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 30days. However, the total volatile fatty acids (TVFA) accumulation increased rapidly and the pH, methane content, and biogas production decreased continuously when the AW content in the feed was increased to 50%.

Suggested Citation

  • Kafle, Gopi Krishna & Kim, Sang Hun, 2013. "Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: Batch and continuous operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 61-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:103:y:2013:i:c:p:61-72
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261912007222
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ehimen, E.A. & Sun, Z.F. & Carrington, C.G. & Birch, E.J. & Eaton-Rye, J.J., 2011. "Anaerobic digestion of microalgae residues resulting from the biodiesel production process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3454-3463.
    2. Molinuevo-Salces, Beatriz & González-Fernández, Cristina & Gómez, Xiomar & García-González, María Cruz & Morán, Antonio, 2012. "Vegetable processing wastes addition to improve swine manure anaerobic digestion: Evaluation in terms of methane yield and SEM characterization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 36-42.
    3. Kaparaju, Prasad & Serrano, María & Angelidaki, Irini, 2010. "Optimization of biogas production from wheat straw stillage in UASB reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 3779-3783, December.
    4. González-Fernández, Cristina & Molinuevo-Salces, Beatriz & García-González, Maria Cruz, 2011. "Evaluation of anaerobic codigestion of microalgal biomass and swine manure via response surface methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3448-3453.
    5. Chandra, R. & Vijay, V.K. & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Khura, T.K., 2012. "Production of methane from anaerobic digestion of jatropha and pongamia oil cakes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 148-159.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Xiaowei & Nges, Ivo Achu & Liu, Jing, 2016. "Improving methane production from wheat straw by digestate liquor recirculation in continuous stirred tank processes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 12-18.
    2. Solé-Bundó, Maria & Passos, Fabiana & Romero-Güiza, Maycoll S. & Ferrer, Ivet & Astals, Sergi, 2019. "Co-digestion strategies to enhance microalgae anaerobic digestion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 471-482.
    3. Zheng, Zehui & Liu, Jinhuan & Yuan, Xufeng & Wang, Xiaofen & Zhu, Wanbin & Yang, Fuyu & Cui, Zongjun, 2015. "Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 249-257.
    4. Zhang, Wanqin & Wei, Quanyuan & Wu, Shubiao & Qi, Dandan & Li, Wei & Zuo, Zhuang & Dong, Renjie, 2014. "Batch anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with dewatered sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 175-183.
    5. Chandra, R. & Takeuchi, H. & Hasegawa, T., 2012. "Hydrothermal pretreatment of rice straw biomass: A potential and promising method for enhanced methane production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 129-140.
    6. Kwietniewska, Ewa & Tys, Jerzy, 2014. "Process characteristics, inhibition factors and methane yields of anaerobic digestion process, with particular focus on microalgal biomass fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 491-500.
    7. Zhang, Yi & Kang, Xihui & Wang, Zhongming & Kong, Xiaoying & Li, Lianhua & Sun, Yongming & Zhu, Shunni & Feng, Siran & Luo, Xinjian & Lv, Pengmei, 2018. "Enhancement of the energy yield from microalgae via enzymatic pretreatment and anaerobic co-digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 400-407.
    8. Montingelli, M.E. & Tedesco, S. & Olabi, A.G., 2015. "Biogas production from algal biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 961-972.
    9. Foteini Sakaveli & Maria Petala & Vasilios Tsiridis & Efthymios Darakas, 2024. "Enhancing Methane Yield in Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Primary Sewage Sludge: A Comprehensive Review on Potential Additives and Strategies," Waste, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-29, January.
    10. Gupta, Aditi & Kumar, Ashwani & Sharma, Satyawati & Vijay, V.K., 2013. "Comparative evaluation of raw and detoxified mahua seed cake for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1514-1521.
    11. Mata-Alvarez, J. & Dosta, J. & Romero-Güiza, M.S. & Fonoll, X. & Peces, M. & Astals, S., 2014. "A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 412-427.
    12. Dębowski, Marcin & Zieliński, Marcin & Grala, Anna & Dudek, Magda, 2013. "Algae biomass as an alternative substrate in biogas production technologies—Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 596-604.
    13. Lim, Juin Yau & Teng, Sin Yong & How, Bing Shen & Nam, KiJeon & Heo, SungKu & Máša, Vítězslav & Stehlík, Petr & Yoo, Chang Kyoo, 2022. "From microalgae to bioenergy: Identifying optimally integrated biorefinery pathways and harvest scheduling under uncertainties in predicted climate," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Martinez, E. & Marcos, A. & Al-Kassir, A. & Jaramillo, M.A. & Mohamad, A.A., 2012. "Mathematical model of a laboratory-scale plant for slaughterhouse effluents biodigestion for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 210-219.
    15. Akroum-Amrouche, Dahbia & Abdi, Nadia & Lounici, Hakim & Mameri, Nabil, 2011. "Effect of physico-chemical parameters on biohydrogen production and growth characteristics by batch culture of Rhodobacter sphaeroides CIP 60.6," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2130-2135, June.
    16. Kapoor, Rimika & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Vijay, Virendra Kumar & Shah, Goldy & Sahota, Shivali & Singh, Dhruv & Verma, Mahesh, 2017. "Factors affecting methane loss from a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1379-1388.
    17. Gao, Shumei & Hu, Changwei & Sun, Shiqing & Xu, Jie & Zhao, Yongjun & Zhang, Hui, 2018. "Performance of piggery wastewater treatment and biogas upgrading by three microalgal cultivation technologies under different initial COD concentration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 360-369.
    18. Prajapati, Sanjeev Kumar & Malik, Anushree & Vijay, Virendra Kumar, 2014. "Comparative evaluation of biomass production and bioenergy generation potential of Chlorella spp. through anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 790-797.
    19. Neves, Viviane T. de C. & Sales, Emerson Andrade & Perelo, Louisa W., 2016. "Influence of lipid extraction methods as pre-treatment of microalgal biomass for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 160-165.
    20. Barik, Debabrata & Murugan, S., 2014. "Investigation on combustion performance and emission characteristics of a DI (direct injection) diesel engine fueled with biogas–diesel in dual fuel mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 760-771.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:103:y:2013:i:c:p:61-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.