IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v327y2022ics0306261922013320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy generation potentials from agricultural residues: The influence of techno-spatial restrictions on biomethane, electricity, and heat production

Author

Listed:
  • Siegrist, Armin
  • Bowman, Gillianne
  • Burg, Vanessa

Abstract

Agricultural biogas production is subject to various spatial restrictions including legislation, biomass availability, transport, and the distribution of final energy products. This study introduces a geographic information system (GIS)-based approach for a comprehensive techno-spatial assessment of the above-mentioned factors, which was tested for Switzerland. First, spatial criteria were identified based on an extensive literature review that was complemented by expert knowledge. Then, quantitative GIS-based methods were developed to identify suitable areas for biogas production. Finally, a location- allocation algorithm was used to estimate national production potentials of biogas, electricity, heat, and biomethane and to assess the relevance of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from biomass transport. Maximum production potentials for electricity, heat, and biomethane were found to be in the order of 6.3, 8.5, and 13.8 PJ per year, respectively. Heat utilization and biomethane injection are often limited to areas in proximity of settlements. Furthermore, biogas production potentials varied depending on legal, economic, and technological factors. Particularly the utilization of excess heat from combined heat and power (CHP) plants was found to react very sensitive to altering spatial constraints due to its dependency on local demand. Resulting emissions from biomass transport were in the order of 0.5–0.8 kgCO2-eq per gigajoule of produced biogas, which is negligible compared to benefits from agricultural biogas production. The modeling results therefore suggest that attention should rather be concentrated on biomass utilization, plant efficiency, and optimal energy utilization when aiming to optimize GHG efficiency. Overall, the findings support the strategic planning of practitioners and authorities for the future development of agricultural biogas production. Moreover, the presented methodology can be transferred to different spatial and technological contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Siegrist, Armin & Bowman, Gillianne & Burg, Vanessa, 2022. "Energy generation potentials from agricultural residues: The influence of techno-spatial restrictions on biomethane, electricity, and heat production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:327:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922013320
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922013320
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lovrak, Ana & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2020. "A Geographical Information System (GIS) based approach for assessing the spatial distribution and seasonal variation of biogas production potential from agricultural residues and municipal biowaste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Skovsgaard, Lise & Jacobsen, Henrik Klinge, 2017. "Economies of scale in biogas production and the significance of flexible regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 77-89.
    3. Zareei, Samira, 2018. "Evaluation of biogas potential from livestock manures and rural wastes using GIS in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 351-356.
    4. Andrea G. Capodaglio & Arianna Callegari & Maria Virginia Lopez, 2016. "European Framework for the Diffusion of Biogas Uses: Emerging Technologies, Acceptance, Incentive Strategies, and Institutional-Regulatory Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Höhn, J. & Lehtonen, E. & Rasi, S. & Rintala, J., 2014. "A Geographical Information System (GIS) based methodology for determination of potential biomasses and sites for biogas plants in southern Finland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Vanessa Burg & Gillianne Bowman & Stefanie Hellweg & Oliver Thees, 2019. "Long-Term Wet Bioenergy Resources in Switzerland: Drivers and Projections until 2050," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Hamelin, Lorie & Møller, Henrik Bjarne & Jørgensen, Uffe, 2021. "Harnessing the full potential of biomethane towards tomorrow's bioeconomy: A national case study coupling sustainable agricultural intensification, emerging biogas technologies and energy system analy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Hamelin, Lorie & Borzęcka, Magdalena & Kozak, Małgorzata & Pudełko, Rafał, 2019. "A spatial approach to bioeconomy: Quantifying the residual biomass potential in the EU-27," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 127-142.
    9. Roberts, Justo José & Cassula, Agnelo Marotta & Osvaldo Prado, Pedro & Dias, Rubens Alves & Balestieri, José Antonio Perrella, 2015. "Assessment of dry residual biomass potential for use as alternative energy source in the party of General Pueyrredón, Argentina," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 568-583.
    10. Mohr, Lukas & Burg, Vanessa & Thees, Oliver & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2019. "Spatial hot spots and clusters of bioenergy combined with socio-economic analysis in Switzerland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 840-851.
    11. Hamelin, Lorie & Naroznova, Irina & Wenzel, Henrik, 2014. "Environmental consequences of different carbon alternatives for increased manure-based biogas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 774-782.
    12. Chambers, Jonathan & Narula, Kapil & Sulzer, Matthias & Patel, Martin K., 2019. "Mapping district heating potential under evolving thermal demand scenarios and technologies: A case study for Switzerland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 682-692.
    13. Scarlat, Nicolae & Fahl, Fernando & Dallemand, Jean-François & Monforti, Fabio & Motola, Vicenzo, 2018. "A spatial analysis of biogas potential from manure in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 915-930.
    14. Joeri Rogelj & Alexander Popp & Katherine V. Calvin & Gunnar Luderer & Johannes Emmerling & David Gernaat & Shinichiro Fujimori & Jessica Strefler & Tomoko Hasegawa & Giacomo Marangoni & Volker Krey &, 2018. "Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 325-332, April.
    15. Chukwuma, Emmanuel Chibundo & Okey-Onyesolu, Faith Chinenye & Ani, Kingsley Amaechi & Nwanna, Emmanuel Chukwudi, 2021. "GIS bio-waste assessment and suitability analysis for biogas power plant: A case study of Anambra state of Nigeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1182-1194.
    16. Lantz, Mikael, 2012. "The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden – A comparison of different CHP technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 502-511.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alicja Słomka & Małgorzata Pawłowska, 2024. "Catch and Cover Crops’ Use in the Energy Sector via Conversion into Biogas—Potential Benefits and Disadvantages," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Christos Argyropoulos & Theodoros Petrakis & Lito-Aspasia Roditi & Angeliki Kavga, 2023. "Opportunities and Potential for Energy Utilization from Agricultural and Livestock Residues in the Region of Thessaly," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Gillianne Bowman & Thierry Huber & Vanessa Burg, 2023. "Linking Solar and Biomass Resources to Generate Renewable Energy: Can We Find Local Complementarities in the Agricultural Setting?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Akca, Mehmet Sadik & Sarikaya, Omer Visali & Doker, Mehmet Fatih & Ocak, Fatih & Kirlangicoglu, Cem & Karaaslan, Yakup & Satoglu, Sule Itir & Altinbas, Mahmut, 2023. "A detailed GIS based assessment of bioenergy plant locations using location-allocation algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    3. Jan K. Kazak & Joanna A. Kamińska & Rafał Madej & Marta Bochenkiewicz, 2020. "Where Renewable Energy Sources Funds are Invested? Spatial Analysis of Energy Production Potential and Public Support," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Yang, Lan & Wang, Xue-Chao & Dai, Min & Chen, Bin & Qiao, Yuanbo & Deng, Huijing & Zhang, Dingfan & Zhang, Yizhe & Villas Bôas de Almeida, Cecília Maria & Chiu, Anthony S.F. & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & W, 2021. "Shifting from fossil-based economy to bio-based economy: Status quo, challenges, and prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Venturini, Giada & Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Münster, Marie, 2019. "How to maximise the value of residual biomass resources: The case of straw in Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 369-388.
    6. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    7. Stürmer, B. & Leiers, D. & Anspach, V. & Brügging, E. & Scharfy, D. & Wissel, T., 2021. "Agricultural biogas production: A regional comparison of technical parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 171-182.
    8. Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin, 2014. "Emergy analysis of a biogas-linked agricultural system in rural China – A case study in Gongcheng Yao Autonomous County," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 173-182.
    9. Chukwuma, Emmanuel Chibundo & Okey-Onyesolu, Faith Chinenye & Ani, Kingsley Amaechi & Nwanna, Emmanuel Chukwudi, 2021. "GIS bio-waste assessment and suitability analysis for biogas power plant: A case study of Anambra state of Nigeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1182-1194.
    10. Eggemann, Lea & Rau, Florian & Stolten, Detlef, 2023. "The ecological potential of manure utilisation in small-scale biogas plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    11. Marconi, Pietro & Rosa, Lorenzo, 2023. "Role of biomethane to offset natural gas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Lovrak, Ana & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2020. "A Geographical Information System (GIS) based approach for assessing the spatial distribution and seasonal variation of biogas production potential from agricultural residues and municipal biowaste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    13. Qian Li & Jingjing Wang & Xiaoyang Wang & Yubin Wang, 2022. "The Impact of Training on Beef Cattle Farmers’ Installation of Biogas Digesters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    14. Paria Sefeedpari & Rafał Pudełko & Anna Jędrejek & Małgorzata Kozak & Magdalena Borzęcka, 2020. "To What Extent Is Manure Produced, Distributed, and Potentially Available for Bioenergy? A Step toward Stimulating Circular Bio-Economy in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Robert Bedoić & Goran Smoljanić & Tomislav Pukšec & Lidija Čuček & Davor Ljubas & Neven Duić, 2021. "Geospatial Analysis and Environmental Impact Assessment of a Holistic and Interdisciplinary Approach to the Biogas Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Hengeveld, E.J. & Bekkering, J. & Van Dael, M. & van Gemert, W.J.T. & Broekhuis, A.A., 2020. "Potential advantages in heat and power production when biogas is collected from several digesters using dedicated pipelines - A case study in the “Province of West-Flanders” (Belgium)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 549-564.
    17. Franziska Steinberger & Tobias Minder & Evelina Trutnevyte, 2020. "Efficiency versus Equity in Spatial Siting of Electricity Generation: Citizen Preferences in a Serious Board Game in Switzerland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Thellufsen, J.Z. & Lund, H. & Sorknæs, P. & Østergaard, P.A. & Chang, M. & Drysdale, D. & Nielsen, S. & Djørup, S.R. & Sperling, K., 2020. "Smart energy cities in a 100% renewable energy context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    19. Avinash Bharti & Kunwar Paritosh & Venkata Ravibabu Mandla & Aakash Chawade & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2021. "GIS Application for the Estimation of Bioenergy Potential from Agriculture Residues: An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    20. Greggio, Nicolas & Balugani, Enrico & Carlini, Carlotta & Contin, Andrea & Labartino, Nicola & Porcelli, Roberto & Quaranta, Marta & Righi, Serena & Vogli, Luciano & Marazza, Diego, 2019. "Theoretical and unused potential for residual biomasses in the Emilia Romagna Region (Italy) through a revised and portable framework for their categorization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 590-606.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:327:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922013320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.