IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v7y2019i1p61-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Widening Participation Agenda in German Higher Education: Discourses and Legitimizing Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Mergner

    (Center for Higher Education, Technical University of Dortmund, Germany)

  • Liudvika Leišytė

    (Center for Higher Education, Technical University of Dortmund, Germany)

  • Elke Bosse

    (Faculty of Education, University of Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

Although participation in higher education (HE) has expanded in Europe, social inequalities remain a major political challenge. As HE expansion has not led to equal access and success, the mechanisms behind policies seeking to reduce inequalities need to be examined. Focusing on the widening participation agenda, this article investigates how universities translate political demands to their local contexts. The translation perspective is adopted to study the German HE system as an example characterized by high social exclusion. Based on policy document analysis, the study first explores the rationales underlying the discourse on widening participation. Second, a multiple case study design is used to investigate the organizational responses to the demand of widening participation. The findings indicate that the political discourse is dominated by two perspectives that regard widening participation as either a means to bring about social justice or to ensure a reliable pool of skilled labor. The study further reveals that different legitimizing strategies serve to link the policy of widening participation to local contexts. This study contributes to research on social inequalities in HE by introducing a translation perspective that permits analysis at both macro and organizational levels, while acknowledging institutional variations in organizational responses to political demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Mergner & Liudvika Leišytė & Elke Bosse, 2019. "The Widening Participation Agenda in German Higher Education: Discourses and Legitimizing Strategies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 61-70.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v7:y:2019:i:1:p:61-70
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v7i1.1605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1605
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v7i1.1605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eero Vaara & Jeanne Tienari, 2008. "A Discursive Perspective on Legitimation Strategies in Multinational Corporations," Post-Print hal-02276724, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gaële Goastellec & Jussi Välimaa, 2019. "Access to Higher Education: An Instrument for Fair Societies?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1-6.
    2. Janieta Bartz & Wibke Kleina, 2021. "Diversity is not the Enemy: Promoting Encounters between University Students and Newcomers," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 154-162.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hongjuan & Young, Michael N. & Tan, Justin & Sun, Weizheng, 2018. "How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 752-767.
    2. Vuontisjärvi, Taru, 2013. "Argumentation and socially questionable business practices: The case of employee downsizing in corporate annual reports," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 292-313.
    3. Lauri Wessel & Riku Ruotsalainen & Henri A. Schildt & Christopher Wickert, 2023. "The Escalation of Organizational Moral Failure in Public Discourse: A Semiotic Analysis of Nokia’s Bochum Plant Closure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(2), pages 459-478, May.
    4. Markus Reihlen & Jan‐Florian Schlapfner & Monika Seeger & Hannah Trittin‐Ulbrich, 2022. "Strategic Venturing as Legitimacy Creation: The Case of Sustainability," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 417-459, March.
    5. Christopher Kurzhals & Lorenz Graf‐Vlachy & Andreas König, 2020. "Strategic leadership and technological innovation: A comprehensive review and research agenda," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 437-464, November.
    6. Lauri Lepistö, 2014. "Taking information technology seriously: on the legitimating discourses of enterprise resource planning system adoption," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 25(3), pages 193-219, December.
    7. Alex Bitektine & Patrick Haack & Joel Bothello & Johanna Mair, 2020. "Inhabited Actors: Internalizing Institutions through Communication and Actorhood Models," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 885-897, June.
    8. Endo, Takahiro & Tsuboyama, Yuki & Hara, Yoritoshi, 2016. "Beyond taxation: Discourse around energy policy in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 412-419.
    9. Julia Mergner & Liudvika Leišytė & Elke Bosse, 2019. "The Widening Participation Agenda in German Higher Education: Discourses and Legitimizing Strategies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 61-70.
    10. Vinnari, Eija & Laine, Matias, 2017. "The moral mechanism of counter accounts: The case of industrial animal production," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-17.
    11. Dermarkar, Simon & Hazgui, Mouna, 2022. "How auditors legitimize commercialism: A micro-discursive analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    12. Leif W. Lundmark & Chong Oh & J. Cameron Verhaal, 0. "A little Birdie told me: Social media, organizational legitimacy, and underpricing in initial public offerings," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    13. Marano, Valentina & Tashman, Pete, 2012. "MNE/NGO partnerships and the legitimacy of the firm," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1122-1130.
    14. Peda, Peeter & Vinnari, Eija, 2020. "The discursive legitimation of profit in public-private service delivery," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Emmanuelle Vaast, 2016. "Matters of visuality in legitimation practices: Dual iconographies in a meeting room," Post-Print hal-01767067, HAL.
    16. Renate E. Meyer & Eero Vaara, 2020. "Institutions and Actorhood as Co‐Constitutive and Co‐Constructed: The Argument and Areas for Future Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 898-910, June.
    17. Dirk C. Moosmayer & Susannah M. Davis, 2016. "Staking Cosmopolitan Claims: How Firms and NGOs Talk About Supply Chain Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 403-417, May.
    18. Stenka, Renata, 2022. "Beyond intentionality in accounting regulation: Habitual strategizing by the IASB," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Masoud Shadnam & Andrew Crane & Thomas B. Lawrence, 2020. "Who Calls It? Actors and Accounts in the Social Construction of Organizational Moral Failure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 699-717, September.
    20. Andrei Panibratov & Ramsés A. Sánchez Herrera & Alvar Castello Esquerdo & Daria Klishevich, 2023. "Surviving populism: A corporate political activity approach in Mexico," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(2), pages 182-200, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v7:y:2019:i:1:p:61-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.