IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v41y2004i2p317-333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simple Matter of Control? NHS Hospital Nurses and New Management

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon C. Bolton

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the past two decades the National Health Hospital Service has been subjected to considerable changes in is organization. ‘New’ public sector management (NPM) has been given the task of changing hospital culture and making service provision more efficient. Nurses, as the largest occupational group within the National Health Service (NHS), have attracted considerable management attention and there are two distinct accounts concerning how NPM has supposedly gained control of the nursing labour process. Firstly, it is proposed that the physical division of labour of health care professionals is now firmly in the hands of hospital management through the use of Tayloristic techniques. Secondly, alternative accounts suggest that public sector organization cultures have been successfully orientated toward a customer service ethos, and that the convincing discourse of ‘quality’ is achieving some success as a normative control device. This paper investigates the responses of nurses to NPM, whichever form this may take, and presents data collected as part of a longitudinal study carried out in an NHS Trust hospital. It charts the changes which have occurred in the nursing labour process over a six year period, but especially draws upon more recent data to show how nurses, over a period of time, develop their own ways of reinterpreting management's desires. It argues that management is more likely to continue to rely on nurses’ traditional autonomy in the delivery of health care in recognition that nurses may resist some but accommodate many of the demands made of them.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon C. Bolton, 2004. "A Simple Matter of Control? NHS Hospital Nurses and New Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 317-333, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:41:y:2004:i:2:p:317-333
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00434.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00434.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00434.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Damian Grimshaw, 1999. "Changes in Skills-Mix and Pay Determination among the Nursing Workforce in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 13(2), pages 295-328, June.
    2. Linda Fuller & Vicki Smith, 1991. "Consumers' Reports: Management by Customers in a Changing Economy," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McDonald, Ruth & Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh & Bayes, Sara & Morriss, Richard & Kai, Joe, 2013. "Competing and coexisting logics in the changing field of English general medical practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 47-54.
    2. Sharon C. Bolton & Maeve Houlihan, 2009. "Beyond the control‐resistance debate," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1/2), pages 5-13, March.
    3. Gill Kirton & Cécile Guillaume, 2019. "When Welfare Professionals Encounter Restructuring and Privatization: The Inside Story of the Probation Service of England and Wales," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(6), pages 929-947, December.
    4. Diane van den Broek, 2017. "Perforated body work: the case of tele-nursing," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(6), pages 904-920, December.
    5. Ian Clark, 2014. "Health-care assistants, aspiration, frustration and job satisfaction in the workplace," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 300-312, July.
    6. Thomas Andersson & Stefan Tengblad, 2009. "When complexity meets culture: new public management and the Swedish police," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1/2), pages 41-56, March.
    7. Nick Jephson & Hugh Cook & Andy Charlwood, 2024. "Prisoners of oath: Junior doctors’ professional identities during and after industrial action," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(2), pages 556-578, May.
    8. Finn, Rachael & Learmonth, Mark & Reedy, Patrick, 2010. "Some unintended effects of teamwork in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1148-1154, April.
    9. Canet Tuba Sarıtaş, 2020. "Precarious contours of work–family conflict: The case of nurses in Turkey," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(1), pages 59-75, March.
    10. Sharon C. Bolton, 2009. "Getting to the heart of the emotional labour process: a reply to Brook," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(3), pages 549-560, September.
    11. Les Worrall & Kim Mather & Roger Seifert, 2010. "Solving the Labour Problem Among Professional Workers in the UK Public Sector: Organisation Change and Performance Management," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 117-137, June.
    12. Elizabeth Goodrick & Trish Reay, 2010. "Florence Nightingale Endures: Legitimizing a New Professional Role Identity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 55-84, January.
    13. Ademola B. Owolabi, 2012. "Effect of Organizational Justice and Organizational Environment on Turn-Over Intention of Health Workers in Ekiti State, Nigeria," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(1), pages 28-34, March.
    14. Walter, Lars & Styhre, Alexander, 2020. "Nursing, bedside care, and the organization of expert knowledge: Professional work as agencement," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3).
    15. Hemantika Basu, 2019. "Mode of Work Organization in Nursing: Management Practices in Private Healthcare in India," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(4), pages 433-454, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian Kessler & Paul Heron & Sue Dopson, 2013. "Indeterminacy and the Regulation of Task Allocation: The Shape of Support Roles in Healthcare," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 51(2), pages 310-332, June.
    2. Hannah Cooke, 2006. "Seagull management and the control of nursing work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 20(2), pages 223-243, June.
    3. Damian Grimshaw, 2000. "Public Sector Employment, Wage Inequality and the Gender Pay Ratio in the UK," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 427-448.
    4. Graeme Currie & Rachael Finn & Graham Martin, 2009. "Professional competition and modernizing the clinical workforce in the NHS," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 267-284, June.
    5. Pflueger, Dane, 2016. "Knowing patients: The customer survey and the changing margins of accounting in healthcare," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 17-33.
    6. Chris Smith & Raffaella Valsecchi & Frank Mueller & Jonathan Gabe, 2008. "Knowledge and the discourse of labour process transformation: nurses and the case of NHS Direct for England," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 22(4), pages 581-599, December.
    7. Stephanie Tailby, 2005. "Agency and bank nursing in the UK National Health Service," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(2), pages 369-389, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:41:y:2004:i:2:p:317-333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.