IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v52y2021i1p82-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The genesis of private dispute resolution in Irish industrial relations

Author

Listed:
  • William K. Roche

Abstract

This article examines the genesis of private dispute resolution arrangements introduced by employers and unions in Ireland. These forms of collective alternative dispute resolution (ADR) comprise three‐person panels or sole adjudicators, who mediate and issue findings on collective disputes. Findings may be non‐binding or binding. Using data and interviews covering 11 private dispute resolution arrangements in 10 organisations, the paper identifies the circumstances in which they have emerged and a series of influences that lead employers and unions make path‐breaking changes in dispute resolution procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • William K. Roche, 2021. "The genesis of private dispute resolution in Irish industrial relations," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 82-106, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:52:y:2021:i:1:p:82-106
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.12318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12318
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.12318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld & Thomas Kochan, 2004. "Taking Stock: Collective Bargaining at the Turn of the Century," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 58(1), pages 3-26, October.
    2. William K. Roche, 2015. "The emergence of a dual system of dispute resolution: private facilitators in Irish industrial relations," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 293-311, July.
    3. Denise Currie & Paul Teague, 2016. "Economic Citizenship and Workplace Conflict in Anglo-American Industrial Relations Systems," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 358-384, June.
    4. repec:ilo:ilowps:459398 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. William K. Roche & Paul Teague, 2011. "Firms and Innovative Conflict Management Systems in Ireland," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 49(3), pages 436-459, September.
    6. Thompson, Clive., 2010. "Dispute prevention and resolution in public services labour relations : good policy and practice," ILO Working Papers 994593983402676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William K. Roche & Paul Teague & Denise Currie, 2023. "Leadership and innovation by professionals: The changing face of public workplace conflict resolution in Ireland," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4-5), pages 401-422, July.
    2. William K Roche, 2023. "Extending the boundaries of alternative dispute resolution: Private dispute resolution in Irish industrial relations," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(3), pages 634-659, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Teague & William Roche & Denise Currie & Tom Gormley, 2020. "Alternative Dispute Resolution in Ireland and the US Model," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(2), pages 345-365, March.
    2. William K. Roche, 2015. "The emergence of a dual system of dispute resolution: private facilitators in Irish industrial relations," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 293-311, July.
    3. Roche William K., 2016. "The development of conflict resolution practices in Irish workplaces," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 64(3-4), pages 61-89, December.
    4. Patricia Elgoibar & Elio Shijaku, 2022. "Bringing the Social Back into Sustainability: Why Integrative Negotiation Matters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Geraghty, Thomas M. & Wiseman, Thomas, 2008. "Wage strikes in 1880s America: A test of the war of attrition model," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 303-326, September.
    6. Erica Romero Pender & Patricia Elgoibar & Lourdes Munduate & Ana Belén García & Martin C Euwema, 2018. "Improving social dialogue: What employers expect from employee representatives," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(2), pages 169-189, June.
    7. William K Roche, 2023. "Extending the boundaries of alternative dispute resolution: Private dispute resolution in Irish industrial relations," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(3), pages 634-659, August.
    8. Alberto Bayo-Moriones & Jose Enrique Galdon-Sanchez & Sara Martinez-de-Morentin, 2016. "The process of wage adjustment: An analysis using establishment-level data," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(2), pages 245-268, May.
    9. Martin Behrens & Markus Helfen, 2016. "The Foundations of Social Partnership," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 334-357, June.
    10. Sue Williamson & Michael O’Donnell & Cameron Roles, 2016. "Bargaining over Australian public service cuts: Do forcing strategies work?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(1), pages 46-63, March.
    11. Fang Cooke & Debi Saini, 2015. "From legalism to strategic HRM in India? Grievance management in transition," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 619-643, September.
    12. Alberto Bayo-Moriones & Jose E. Galdon-Sanchez & Sara Martinez-de-Morentin, 2017. "Performance Measurement and Incentive Intensity," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 496-546, December.
    13. Christine A. Riordan & Alexander M. Kowalski, 2021. "From Bread and Roses to #MeToo: Multiplicity, Distance, and the Changing Dynamics of Conflict in IR Theory," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(3), pages 580-606, May.
    14. repec:ilo:ilowps:467628 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. David Lewin & Jeffrey H. Keefe & Thomas A. Kochan, 2012. "The New Great Debate about Unionism and Collective Bargaining in U.S. State and Local Governments," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 65(4), pages 749-778, October.
    16. Raghav Agarwal & Atharva Shirke & Nehajoan Panackal, 2020. "Enablers of the Collective Bargaining in Industrial Relations: A Study of India’s Industrial Policies Through ISM and MICMAC Analysis," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 63(3), pages 781-798, September.
    17. William K. Roche & Paul Teague & Denise Currie, 2023. "Leadership and innovation by professionals: The changing face of public workplace conflict resolution in Ireland," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4-5), pages 401-422, July.
    18. Ashwini K. Agrawal, 2012. "Corporate Governance Objectives of Labor Union Shareholders: Evidence from Proxy Voting," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(1), pages 187-226.
    19. Hyondong Kim & Kang Sung-Choon, 2013. "Strategic HR functions and firm performance: The moderating effects of high-involvement work practices," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 91-113, March.
    20. Grawitzky, Renee., 2011. "Collective bargaining in times of crisis : a case study of South Africa," ILO Working Papers 994676283402676, International Labour Organization.
    21. repec:ilo:ilowps:480573 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Bayo-Moriones, Alberto & Galdon-Sanchez, Jose Enrique & Martinez-de-Morentin, Sara, 2011. "The Process of Wage Adjustment: An Analysis Using Establishment-Level Data," IZA Discussion Papers 5998, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:52:y:2021:i:1:p:82-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.