IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgw/p0068.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Strategic unionism in Eastern Europe: The case of Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Trif, Aurora
  • Koch, Karl

Abstract

The shift from centrally planned economies to market-oriented economic models presented trade unions in Eastern European countries with crucial choices in relation to their roles as industrial relations actors. This paper investigates whether (and why) unions have chosen adversarial and/or co-operative relationships with the employers, based on a strategic choice conceptual framework. It focuses on trade union relations with employers at national, sectoral and company levels in Romania. It is argued that adversarial and co-operative relations between unions and employers developed simultaneously after 1989, but co-operation was the prevalent approach. Evidence suggests that ideological legacies, former institutions and the initial decision to participate in the macroeconomic transformation played a key role in shaping unions' choices towards co-operation with employers. Although this paper confirms the widespread view that labour is rather weak in Eastern Europe, it indicates that unions can be proactive and shape their own future if they have the capacity to mobilise their members and union leaders have the skills and willingness to use both conflict and co-operation in their relationships with employers. The comparison of evidence from Romania with other Eastern European countries reflects on the stage of Romanian transformation and also illustrates a wider possible applicability of the theoretical framework employed for the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Trif, Aurora & Koch, Karl, 2005. "Strategic unionism in Eastern Europe: The case of Romania," MPIfG Working Paper 05/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgw:p0068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/41677/1/550529705.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Roderick, 1999. "Transforming Management in Central and Eastern Europe," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198775683.
    2. Lothar Funk & Hagen Lesch, 2004. "Industrial relations in Central and Eastern Europe," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 39(5), pages 264-270, September.
    3. Lipset, Seymour Martin, 1983. "Radicalism or Reformism: The Sources of Working-class Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 77(1), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Thirkell, John & Petkov, Krastyu & Vickerstaff, Sarah, 1998. "The Transformation of Labour Relations: Restructuring and Privatization in Eastern Europe and Russia," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198289791.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ștefan Guga & Dragoș Adăscăliței, 2016. "Taking stock of the crisis: A multilevel analysis of the Romanian trade union movement," Discussion Papers 39, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roderick Martin, 2002. "Politicized Managerial Capitalism: Enterprise Structures In Post‐Socialist Central And Eastern Europe," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 823-839, September.
    2. Trif, Aurora, 2005. "Collective bargaining practices in Eastern Europe: Case study evidence from Romania," MPIfG Working Paper 05/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Richard Croucher & Marian Rizov, 2012. "Union Influence in Post-Socialist Europe," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 65(3), pages 630-650, July.
    4. Trif, Aurora, 2005. "Explaining Diversity in Industrial Relations at Company Level in Eastern Europe: Evidence from Romania," MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    5. Maaja Vadi & Harry Roots, 2004. "The Estonian organizations - the subjects of transformation," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 44, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    6. Ștefan Guga & Dragoș Adăscăliței, 2016. "Taking stock of the crisis: A multilevel analysis of the Romanian trade union movement," Discussion Papers 39, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    7. Elizabeth Brainerd, 2000. "Women in Transition: Changes in Gender Wage Differentials in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(1), pages 138-162, October.
    8. Daniel Beland & Patrik Marier, 2004. "The Politics of Protest Avoidance: Policy Windows, Labor Mobilization, and Pension Reform in France," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 114, McMaster University.
    9. Petrocik, John R., 1998. "Reformulating the Party Coalitions: The "Christian Democratic" Republicans," Institute for Social Science Research, Working Paper Series qt27r0t4k4, Institute for Social Science Research, UCLA.
    10. Franck Biétry & Jordane Creusier & Patrice Laroche & Sandra Camus, 2014. "Perceived support, affective commitments and subjective career success: a person-centred approach [Soutiens perçus, engagements affectifs et succès de carrière subjectif : une approche en termes de," Post-Print hal-01884095, HAL.
    11. Fumbani Mphande & Isaac Kabelenga, 2020. "Unintended consequences of modernization theory on university students and graduates in Zambia," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 1, pages 69-81.
    12. John W. Budd & J. Ryan Lamare, 2021. "The Importance of Political Systems for Trade Union Membership, Coverage and Influence: Theory and Comparative Evidence," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 757-787, September.
    13. Martin Sokol, 2001. "Central and Eastern Europe a Decade After the Fall of State-socialism: Regional Dimensions of Transition Processes," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(7), pages 645-655.
    14. Eleonora Matteazzi & Ariane Pailhé & Anne Solaz, 2014. "Part-Time Wage Penalties for Women in Prime Age," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 67(3), pages 955-985, July.
    15. Avdagic, Sabina, 2003. "Accounting for Variations in Trade Union Effectiveness: State-Labor Relations in East Central Europe," MPIfG Discussion Paper 03/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    16. Maaja Vadi, 2003. "Background to the organisational culture developments in transitional Estonia," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, in: Maaja Vadi (ed.), Organisational Culture in Estonia : Manifestations and Consequences, edition 1, volume 16, chapter 1, pages 27-46, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    17. Jake Rosenfeld, 2010. "Economic Determinants of Voting in an Era of Union Decline," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 91(2), pages 379-395, June.
    18. Jan Drahokoupil, 2008. "Who won the contest for a new property class? Structural transformation of elites in the Visegrád Four region," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 13(4), pages 360-377.
    19. Alexander Hicks, 1994. "Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Analytical Induction," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 23(1), pages 86-113, August.
    20. Carlile, Lonny, 2004. "The Japanese Labor Movement and Institutional Reform," EIJS Working Paper Series 200, Stockholm School of Economics, The European Institute of Japanese Studies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgw:p0068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.