IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgw/p0069.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Collective bargaining practices in Eastern Europe: Case study evidence from Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Trif, Aurora

Abstract

There are several studies on recent developments in collective bargaining in Eastern Europe, but there is still a debate about the extent to which collective bargaining practices resemble those in continental Western Europe. This paper aims to contribute to this debate, by examining primary data on collective bargaining practices in Romania using an actor-centred institutionalist approach. It focuses on collective bargaining in four large chemical companies. Comparisons are made to other countries in order to highlight the developments in Romanian cases. Unexpectedly, the study's findings point to an increase in state intervention in establishing the terms and conditions of employment after 1989, due to the state's new roles during the transformation process that affected job security. The study suggests a considerable increase in the influence of top managers in determining pay and working conditions, while trade unions retained the considerable influence over social benefits in large companies. The findings show continuance of certain pre-1989 practices, such as a persistence of high state intervention and a limited independence of the trade unions from the management. This paper contributes to a deeper understanding of institutional changes in the context of a shift from a centrally planned economy to a market-based economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Trif, Aurora, 2005. "Collective bargaining practices in Eastern Europe: Case study evidence from Romania," MPIfG Working Paper 05/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgw:p0069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/41657/1/550538461.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Roderick, 1999. "Transforming Management in Central and Eastern Europe," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198775683.
    2. Bernhard Ebbinghaus, 2009. "Can Path Dependence Explain Institutional Change? Two Approaches Applied to Welfare State Reform," Chapters, in: Lars Magnusson & Jan Ottosson (ed.), The Evolution of Path Dependence, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Lothar Funk & Hagen Lesch, 2004. "Industrial relations in Central and Eastern Europe," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 39(5), pages 264-270, September.
    4. Colin Crouch & Henry Farrell, 2004. "Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism," Rationality and Society, , vol. 16(1), pages 5-43, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Domnisoru, Ciprian., 2012. "Decent work policy options for the Romanian economy," ILO Working Papers 994725643402676, International Labour Organization.
    2. Eichhorst, Werner & Kendzia, Michael Jan & Vandeweghe, Barbara, 2011. "Cross-Border Collective Bargaining and Transnational Social Dialogue," IZA Research Reports 38, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:472564 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessia Berni & Mariavittoria Cicellin & Stefano Consiglio & Luigi Moschera, 2012. "The evolution of the Italian Temporary Work Agency field: A path dependence perspective," Discussion Papers 10_2012, CRISEI, University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy.
    2. Ulybina, Olga, 2014. "Russian forests: The path of reform," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 143-150.
    3. Trif, Aurora & Koch, Karl, 2005. "Strategic unionism in Eastern Europe: The case of Romania," MPIfG Working Paper 05/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Paul Teague, 2009. "Path Dependency and Comparative Industrial Relations: The Case of Conflict Resolution Systems in Ireland and Sweden," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(3), pages 499-520, September.
    5. Julien Etienne, 2015. "Different ways of blowing the whistle: Explaining variations in decentralized enforcement in the UK and France," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 309-324, December.
    6. Martin Heidenreich (ed.), 2012. "Innovation and Institutional Embeddedness of Multinational Companies," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14459.
    7. Emil Evenhuis, 2017. "Institutional change in cities and regions: a path dependency approach," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 509-526.
    8. Bernhard Ebbinghaus, 2009. "Can Path Dependence Explain Institutional Change? Two Approaches Applied to Welfare State Reform," Chapters, in: Lars Magnusson & Jan Ottosson (ed.), The Evolution of Path Dependence, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Maaja Vadi & Harry Roots, 2004. "The Estonian organizations - the subjects of transformation," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 44, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    10. Ștefan Guga & Dragoș Adăscăliței, 2016. "Taking stock of the crisis: A multilevel analysis of the Romanian trade union movement," Discussion Papers 39, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    11. Li, Renyu & Ma, Zhongxin & Chen, Xirong, 2020. "Historical market genes, marketization and economic growth in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 327-333.
    12. Simeon Simeonov, 2020. "Path Dependence: Determinants and Impacts of Technology Adoption," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 300-310, June.
    13. Thomas Prosser, 2017. "Explaining Implementation through Varieties of Capitalism Theory: The Case of the Telework and Work-related Stress Agreements," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 889-908, July.
    14. Robert Daniel Stanescu & Alexandra Cristina Dinu, 2021. "The Tracking of Industrial and Digital Revolutions and the Importance of Human Capital Development," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 532-537, December.
    15. Roderick Martin, 2002. "Politicized Managerial Capitalism: Enterprise Structures In Post‐Socialist Central And Eastern Europe," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 823-839, September.
    16. Fumbani Mphande & Isaac Kabelenga, 2020. "Unintended consequences of modernization theory on university students and graduates in Zambia," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 1, pages 69-81.
    17. Milan Žák & Petr Vymětal, 2006. "Institucionální aspekty nové komparativní ekonomie: ČR a EU [Institutional aspects of new comparative economy: Czech republic and European union]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(5), pages 583-609.
    18. Rachael Gibson & Harald Bathelt, 2014. "Proximity relations and global knowledge flows: specialization and diffusion processes across capitalist varieties," Chapters, in: André Torre & Frédéric Wallet (ed.), Regional Development and Proximity Relations, chapter 9, pages 291-314, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Pamela Jeziorska-Biel & Katarzyna Leśniewska-Napierała & Konrad Czapiewski, 2021. "(Circular) Path Dependence—The Role of Vineyards in Land Use, Society and Regional Development—The Case of Lubuskie Region (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Ron Martin, 2010. "Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography—Rethinking Regional Path Dependence: Beyond Lock-in to Evolution," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 86(1), pages 1-27, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgw:p0069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.