IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/r3fpc.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The New Right Stuff: Social Imaginaries of Outer Space and the Capitalist Accumulation of the Cosmos

Author

Listed:
  • Genovese, Taylor R.

    (Arizona State University)

Abstract

This thesis utilizes ethnographic and historical data in order to propose that the trajectory of outer space imaginaries—and therefore, as will be demonstrated, the future realities of outer space affairs—has drifted from peaceful exploration to violent exploitation due to the rise of private space corporations (operating under the moniker of NewSpace). This is partially due to the increasing acceptance of neoliberal capitalism within the United States—and much of the Global North—since the 1970s. Furthermore, NewSpace companies —which now possess multi-billion dollar contracts with governmental space agencies—are zealous adopters of neoliberal economics, and these philosophies are tied to colonial conceptions of the individual, limited governance, unchecked resource extraction, and frontier mentalities. These concepts became apparent during my multi-sited ethnographic investigations of NewSpace—as well as governmental—facilities and museums. This thesis argues that these hegemonic economic ontologies must be met with resistance from social scientists, science fiction authors, and the public in order to create a human future in outer space that is equitable, decolonized, and democratic.

Suggested Citation

  • Genovese, Taylor R., 2017. "The New Right Stuff: Social Imaginaries of Outer Space and the Capitalist Accumulation of the Cosmos," SocArXiv r3fpc, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:r3fpc
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/r3fpc
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/595c2fc1594d90022c835a70/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/r3fpc?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kropotkin, Petr, 1902. "Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number kropotkin1902.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ignacy SACHS, 2004. "Inclusive development and decent work for all," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 143(1-2), pages 161-184, March.
    2. Glaser-Segura, Daniel & Anghel, Laurentiu-Dan, 2003. "Empirical Study Of Institutions Romania," MPRA Paper 9157, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2002.
    3. Fabiana Liar Agudo & Barbara Stolte Bezerra & José Alcides Gobbo & Luis Alberto Bertolucci Paes, 2022. "Unfolding research themes for industrial symbiosis and underlying theories," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1682-1702, December.
    4. Roberto Cazzolla Gatti & Roger Koppl & Brian D. Fath & Stuart Kauffman & Wim Hordijk & Robert E. Ulanowicz, 2020. "On the emergence of ecological and economic niches," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 99-127, July.
    5. Vahabi,Mehrdad, 2019. "The Political Economy of Predation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107591370, November.
    6. Leonard, Thomas C., 2009. "Origins of the myth of social Darwinism: The ambiguous legacy of Richard Hofstadter's Social Darwinism in American Thought," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 37-51, July.
    7. Oliver, Adam, 2020. "Reviving and revising economic liberalism: an examination in relation to private decisions and public policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103060, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Naomi Beck, 2012. "Social Darwinism," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2012-15, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    9. Stefania Proli, 2017. "Carlo Doglio (1914–1995) and the theory and practice of slingshot planning," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 533-556, October.
    10. Takeshi Kato, 2022. "Islamic and capitalist economies: Comparison using econophysics models of wealth exchange and redistribution," Papers 2206.05443, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    11. Frank Birkin & Thomas Polesie, 2011. "An Epistemic Analysis of (Un)Sustainable Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 239-253, October.
    12. Janet Landa, 1976. "An Exchange Economy with Legally Binding Contract: A Public Choice Approach," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 905-922, December.
    13. N/A, 1981. "Letter To the Editor On the Problem of Aggression," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 27(1), pages 63-64, April.
    14. Kevin T. Jackson, 2016. "Economy of Mutuality: Merging Financial and Social Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 499-517, February.
    15. Saral, Ali Seyhun, 2020. "Evolution of Conditional Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma," OSF Preprints wcpkz, Center for Open Science.
    16. Uygar Ozesmi, 2019. "The Prosumer Economy -- Being Like a Forest," Papers 1903.07615, arXiv.org.
    17. Foster, John, 1997. "The analytical foundations of evolutionary economics: From biological analogy to economic self-organization," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 427-451, October.
    18. Geoffrey Hodgson & Thorbjørn Knudsen, 2008. "In search of general evolutionary principles: Why Darwinism is too important to be left to the biologists," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 51-69, April.
    19. Jácint Farkas & Zoltán Raffay & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2022. "Fundamental Accessibility and Technical Accessibility in Travels—The Encounter of Two Worlds Which Leads to a Paradigm Shift," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Tarik Tazdaït & Alejandro Caparros & Jean-Chrsitophe Péreau, 2008. "Mutual Aid: An Indirect Evolution Analysis," CIRED Working Papers halshs-00275386, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:r3fpc. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.