IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rppexx/v32y2017i4p533-556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carlo Doglio (1914–1995) and the theory and practice of slingshot planning

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Proli

Abstract

In 1961 Carlo Doglio (1914–1995) left London, where he had spent the previous six years studying Town Planning (among other things), to join the poet, activist, and social worker Danilo Dolci in leading the development plan of one of the poorest and most marginalized Italian regions: Sicily. Doglio’s actions were guided by a constant dissatisfaction with a model of society that excluded communities from the decision-making process. In Sicily, he saw this as an opportunity to use technical knowledge and experience to achieve a different model of social organization, based on social cooperation and voluntary action. As a militant planner and anarchist, he believed that the planning process had to be structured from the bottom-up in order to offer choices that could be freely discussed and appropriately fulfilled, by the community. Based on original documents from the planner’s archive, this study provides an overview of his work in Sicily, the place where his theories and practices best express his identity as a planner. Although this article offers a detailed examination of Doglio’s work, it also introduces the notion of urban and regional planning as a form of social action and as a means to promote a new form of society, built on pro-active and cooperative communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Proli, 2017. "Carlo Doglio (1914–1995) and the theory and practice of slingshot planning," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 533-556, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:32:y:2017:i:4:p:533-556
    DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2017.1301266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02665433.2017.1301266
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02665433.2017.1301266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kropotkin, Petr, 1902. "Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number kropotkin1902.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ignacy SACHS, 2004. "Inclusive development and decent work for all," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 143(1-2), pages 161-184, March.
    2. Glaser-Segura, Daniel & Anghel, Laurentiu-Dan, 2003. "Empirical Study Of Institutions Romania," MPRA Paper 9157, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2002.
    3. Fabiana Liar Agudo & Barbara Stolte Bezerra & José Alcides Gobbo & Luis Alberto Bertolucci Paes, 2022. "Unfolding research themes for industrial symbiosis and underlying theories," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1682-1702, December.
    4. Roberto Cazzolla Gatti & Roger Koppl & Brian D. Fath & Stuart Kauffman & Wim Hordijk & Robert E. Ulanowicz, 2020. "On the emergence of ecological and economic niches," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 99-127, July.
    5. Vahabi,Mehrdad, 2019. "The Political Economy of Predation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107591370.
    6. Leonard, Thomas C., 2009. "Origins of the myth of social Darwinism: The ambiguous legacy of Richard Hofstadter's Social Darwinism in American Thought," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 37-51, July.
    7. Oliver, Adam, 2020. "Reviving and revising economic liberalism: an examination in relation to private decisions and public policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103060, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Naomi Beck, 2012. "Social Darwinism," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2012-15, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    9. Takeshi Kato, 2022. "Islamic and capitalist economies: Comparison using econophysics models of wealth exchange and redistribution," Papers 2206.05443, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    10. Frank Birkin & Thomas Polesie, 2011. "An Epistemic Analysis of (Un)Sustainable Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 239-253, October.
    11. Janet Landa, 1976. "An Exchange Economy with Legally Binding Contract: A Public Choice Approach," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 905-922, December.
    12. N/A, 1981. "Letter To the Editor On the Problem of Aggression," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 27(1), pages 63-64, April.
    13. Kevin T. Jackson, 2016. "Economy of Mutuality: Merging Financial and Social Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 499-517, February.
    14. Genovese, Taylor R., 2017. "The New Right Stuff: Social Imaginaries of Outer Space and the Capitalist Accumulation of the Cosmos," SocArXiv r3fpc, Center for Open Science.
    15. Saral, Ali Seyhun, 2020. "Evolution of Conditional Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma," OSF Preprints wcpkz, Center for Open Science.
    16. Uygar Ozesmi, 2019. "The Prosumer Economy -- Being Like a Forest," Papers 1903.07615, arXiv.org.
    17. Foster, John, 1997. "The analytical foundations of evolutionary economics: From biological analogy to economic self-organization," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 427-451, October.
    18. Geoffrey Hodgson & Thorbjørn Knudsen, 2008. "In search of general evolutionary principles: Why Darwinism is too important to be left to the biologists," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 51-69, April.
    19. Jácint Farkas & Zoltán Raffay & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2022. "Fundamental Accessibility and Technical Accessibility in Travels—The Encounter of Two Worlds Which Leads to a Paradigm Shift," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Tarik Tazdaït & Alejandro Caparros & Jean-Chrsitophe Péreau, 2008. "Mutual Aid: An Indirect Evolution Analysis," CIRED Working Papers halshs-00275386, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:32:y:2017:i:4:p:533-556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rppe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.