IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v42y2005i11p2071-2088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining the Social Economy and its Governance at the Neighbourhood Level: A Methodological Reflection

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Moulaert

    (Global Urban Research Unit (GURU), University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NE1 7RU. Frank.Moulaert@ncl.ac.uk)

  • Jacques Nussbaumer

    (CLERSE-IFRESI-CNRS, 2 rue des Canonniers, 59800 Lille, France. Jacques.Nussbaumer@ifresi.univ-lille1.fr)

Abstract

This largely methodological paper focuses on how to define the social economy and its governance at the local and especially the urban neighbourhood level. A distinction is made between essentialist and holistic definitions. The second section appraises the potential contribution of various current ideas in institutional economics and economic sociology to the definition of the social economy and its governance. It is found that 'old' and 'new' institutionalism in particular offer useful tools, including the holistic methodology as applied by John Commons. The third section elaborates on the analytical elements required for defining the social economy from a holistic perspective, stressing the role of essentialist abstract categories, the role of local culture and articulation between spatial scales. First, we show how the notion of social capital defined through a 'holistic approach' can enrich the definition of the social economy. Secondly, we stress the importance of empirical investigations in feeding into the holistic definitional work. The fourth section concludes the paper by enhancing the necessary dialogue between an abstract-essentialist and a contextualised holistic definition of the social economy at the neighbourhood level.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Moulaert & Jacques Nussbaumer, 2005. "Defining the Social Economy and its Governance at the Neighbourhood Level: A Methodological Reflection," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 2071-2088, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:11:p:2071-2088
    DOI: 10.1080/420980500279752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/420980500279752
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/420980500279752?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williamson, Oliver E, 1973. "Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 316-325, May.
    2. Moulaert, Frank, 2000. "Globalization and Integrated Area Development in European Cities," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199241132.
    3. Bob Jessop & Ngai-Ling Sum, 2006. "Beyond the Regulation Approach," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3606.
    4. Yngve Ramstad, 1986. "A Pragmatist’s Quest for Holistic Knowledge: The Scientific Methodology of John R. Commons," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 1067-1105, December.
    5. Kropotkin, Petr, 1902. "Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number kropotkin1902.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eun Sun Lee & Kyujin Jung, 2018. "Dynamics of social economy self-organized on social media: following social entrepreneur forum and social economy network on Facebook," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 635-651, March.
    2. Cace, Sorin, 2010. "Good Practices in Social Economy in Greece and in Other States of the European Union," MPRA Paper 79940, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Andries, Petra & Daou, Alain & Verheyden, Laura, 2019. "Innovation as a vehicle for improving socially vulnerable groups’ access to basic provisions: A research note on the development of a questionnaire module," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 281-288.
    4. Seppe De Blust & Oswald Devisch & Jan Schreurs, 2019. "Towards a Situational Understanding of Collective Learning: A Reflexive Framework," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 19-30.
    5. Norbert Laurisz, 2019. "The Role of Stakeholders in Development of Social Economy Organizations in Poland: An Integrative Approach," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Dachs, Bernhard, 2017. "The impact of new technologies on the labour market and the social economy," MPRA Paper 90519, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Frank Moulaert & Barbara Van Dyck & Ahmed Z. Khan & Jan Schreurs, 2013. "Building a Meta-Framework to 'Address' Spatial Quality," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3-4), pages 389-409, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jim Glassman, 2018. "Geopolitical economies of development and democratization in East Asia: Themes, concepts, and geographies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 407-415, March.
    2. Kafigi Jeje, 2020. "Risk-Taking and Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Lessons from Tanzanian Bakeries," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22.
    3. Lydia Bals & Jon F. Kirchoff & Kai Foerstl, 2016. "Exploring the reshoring and insourcing decision making process: toward an agenda for future research," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 102-116, December.
    4. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    5. Ignacy SACHS, 2004. "Inclusive development and decent work for all," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 143(1-2), pages 161-184, March.
    6. Ewelina Nojszewska, 2011. "Economic effectiveness as an analytical tool for health care (Efektywnosc ekonomiczna jako narzedzie analityczne dla ochrony zdrowia)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 9(33), pages 11-26.
    7. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2003. "Darwinism and Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 85-97, March.
    8. Torill Nyseth & Abdelillah Hamdouch, 2019. "The Transformative Power of Social Innovation in Urban Planning and Local Development," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6.
    9. Fabien Tarrit, 2009. "The explosion of the current world crisis: an illustration of the instability of capitalism. A Marxist view," Working Papers hal-02020890, HAL.
    10. Fındık, Derya & Tansel, Aysit, 2013. "Intangible investment and technical efficiency: The case of software-intensive manufacturing firms in Turkey," MPRA Paper 66165, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Aug 2014.
    11. Sjur Kasa & Anders Underthun, 2010. "Navigation in New Terrain with Familiar Maps: Masterminding Sociospatial Equality through Resource-Oriented Innovation Policy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(6), pages 1328-1345, June.
    12. Judith Schicklinski, 2015. "Civil Society Actors as Drivers of Socio-ecological Transition? Green Spaces in European Cities as Laboratories of Social Innovation. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 102," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58259.
    13. Dirk Hackbarth & Richmond Mathews & David Robinson, 2014. "Capital Structure, Product Market Dynamics, and the Boundaries of the Firm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2971-2993, December.
    14. Glaser-Segura, Daniel & Anghel, Laurentiu-Dan, 2003. "Empirical Study Of Institutions Romania," MPRA Paper 9157, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2002.
    15. Jeon, Heesang, 2015. "Knowledge and Contemporary Capitalism in Light of Marx's Value Theory," Thesis Commons g5njk, Center for Open Science.
    16. Max Zongyuan Shang & Ken McEwan, 2021. "The make‐or‐buy decision of feed on livestock farms: Evidence from Ontario swine farms," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(3), pages 353-368, September.
    17. Jacques Nussbaumer & Frank Moulaert, 2004. "Integrated Area Development and social innovation in European cities," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 249-257, July.
    18. Soleri, Daniela & Kleinman, Nathaniel & Newburn, Rebecca, 2021. "Community Seed Groups: Biological and Especially Social Investigations Can Support Crisis Response Capacity," SocArXiv swv47, Center for Open Science.
    19. Chuanglin Fang & Yichun Xie, 2008. "Site Planning and Guiding Principles of Hi-Tech Parks in China: Shenzhen as a Case Study," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(1), pages 100-121, February.
    20. Heloïse Berkowitz & Marcelo Bucheli & Hervé Dumez, 2017. "Collectively Designing CSR Through Meta-Organizations: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 753-769, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:11:p:2071-2088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.