IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhb/aarmap/0075.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The beef market in the European Union

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This report analyses the market for beef in the European Union. The information in this report primarily concerns the EU-15 countries. More than half of the beef consumption in the EU is sold as fresh beef products at the retail level, the rest being used in processed products or sold through catering outlets. This report will primarily focus on the market for beef sold fresh at the retail level. The report analyses consumption patterns and looks at various explanations of changes in beef consumption. A complementary analysis of the structure of the beef supply chain will comprise all links from farmers through cattle markets, slaughtering companies and wholesalers to retailers. Such an analysis of the basic structure of the distribution chain is helpful with a view to understanding the market’s use or non-use of marketing parameters like branding, advertising, product quality, and new product development. Section 2 contains an overview of the European beef market including trends in consumption, production and foreign trade as well as a description of some legal and political issues as well as of some factors concerning health and food safety, which are of importance to the beef market participants. In section 3 the beef consumption patterns in the EU are analysed and various factors influencing consumption patterns are considered, including demographic and economic factors as well as the influence of consumer preferences. Section 4 contains an analysis of the beef sector in terms of structure, competition and marketing strategies. Section 5 concludes the report with a summary of key findings. A number of interviews with slaughtering companies, trade organisations and retail chains in the United Kingdom, Greece and Denmark have been conducted to support the compilation of information for the report. The interviews have contributed to a better understanding of the market and they have provided validation for some of the information gathered in the report. The areas covered concern market trends, relations between actors in the distribution chain, product quality, new product development, branding, advertising and promotion. Where interviews contained valuable insights or comments which were difficult to summarise in a meaningful way, the answers have been reproduced in smaller print in nearly full length. Some of the data are incorporated in the text. The interview guidelines are attached in the Appendix. Five interviews were conducted in Denmark, three in the United Kingdom and four in Greece. The companies are classified according to size and market. Codes are used in the report to identify respondents. A legend of codes can be found in the Appendix.

Suggested Citation

  • Nielsen, Niels Asger & Jeppesen, Lisbeth Fruensgaard, 2001. "The beef market in the European Union," MAPP Working Papers 75, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, The MAPP Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhb:aarmap:0075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://130.226.203.239/pub/mapp/wp/wp75.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Azzam, Azzeddine M. & Schroeter, John R., 1997. "Concentration in Beef Packing: Do Gains Outweigh Losses?," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-3.
    2. Jill E. Hobbs, 1996. "Transaction costs and slaughter cattle procurement: Processors' selection of supply channels," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(6), pages 509-523.
    3. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & van Trijp, Hans C M, 1996. "Quality Guidance: A Consumer-Based Approach to Food Quality Improvement Using Partial Least Squares," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 23(2), pages 195-215.
    4. Anderson, Eugene W & Shugan, Steven M, 1991. "Repositioning for Changing Preferences: The Case of Beef versus Poultry," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 219-232, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barrena Figueroa, Ramo & Sanchez Garcia, Mercedes & Rosa, Franco, 2005. "Influence of Product Perception and Quality Label Valuation on Consumer Decision. The Case of Beef in Italy and Spain," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24515, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Grunert, Klaus G., 2006. "How changes in consumer behaviour and retailing affect competence requirements for food producers and processors," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(11), pages 1-20.
    3. Sören Prehn & Bernhard Brümmer & Stanley R. Thompson, 2015. "Payment decoupling and intra-European calf trade," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 42(4), pages 625-650.
    4. Kurmas Akdogan, 2018. "Mean-reversion and structural change in European food prices," Central Bank Review, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, vol. 18(4), pages 163-173.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wijnands, Jo H.M. & van der Lans, Karin & Hobbs, Jill E., 2006. "International Flower Networks: Transparency and Risks in Marketing Channel Choice," 99th Seminar, February 8-10, 2006, Bonn, Germany 7759, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Barrena Figueroa, Ramo & Sanchez Garcia, Mercedes & Gracia, Azucena & Gil, Jose Maria, 2002. "Confidence in the Beef Production System as a Key Factor to Mitigate the Impact of BSE on Beef Consumption," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24873, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. He, Senhui & Fletcher, Stanley M. & Rimal, Arbindra, 2004. "Acceptance Of Irradiated Beef And Its Effect On Beef Consumption," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 35(1), pages 1-6, March.
    4. Verbeke, Wim & Ward, Ronald W., 2003. "Importance of EU Label Requirements: An Application of Ordered Probit Models to Belgium Beef Labels," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22077, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Fernando Mata & Maria Dos-Santos & Jack Cocksedge, 2023. "Attitudinal and Behavioural Differences towards Farm Animal Welfare among Consumers in the BRIC Countries and the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Freeman, Gusta, 2010. "Economics of Fertilizer Utilization in Small-Scale Farming Systems and Appropriate Role for Policy," Research Theses 157509, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    7. Dimitri, Carolyn & Jaenicke, Edward C., 2001. "Cash Market Or Contract? How Technology And Consumer Demand Influence The Decision," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20723, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Harrison, R. Wes & Gillespie, Jeffrey & Fields, Deacue, 2005. "Analysis of Cardinal and Ordinal Assumptions in Conjoint Analysis," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(2), pages 238-252, October.
    9. Liddell, Sterling & Bailey, DeeVon, 2001. "Market Opportunities And Threats To The U.S. Pork Industry Posed By Traceability Systems," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16.
    10. Jacob Suher & Courtney Szocs & Koert Ittersum, 2021. "When imperfect is preferred: the differential effect of aesthetic imperfections on choice of processed and unprocessed foods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 903-924, September.
    11. Hult, G. Tomas M. & Sharma, Pratyush Nidhi & Morgeson, Forrest V. & Zhang, Yufei, 2019. "Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction: Do They Differ Across Online and Offline Purchases?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 10-23.
    12. Stringer, Randy & Sang, Naiquan & Croppenstedt, André, 2009. "Producers, Processors, and Procurement Decisions: The Case of Vegetable Supply Chains in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 1773-1780, November.
    13. Minseong Kang & Byeong‐Il Ahn, 2023. "Market power and cost‐efficiency effects: Broiler packing industry in South Korea," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1157-1172, October.
    14. Jason R.V. Franken & Joost M.E. Pennings & Philip Garcia, 2018. "Graphical Illustration of Interaction Effects in Binary Choice Models: A Note," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 852-858, September.
    15. Dickinson, David L. & Bailey, DeeVon, 2005. "Experimental Evidence on Willingness to Pay for Red Meat Traceability in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 37(3), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Piggott, Nicholas E. & Wright, Vic, 1992. "From Consumer Choice Process To Aggregate Analysis: Marketing Insights For Models Of Meat Demand," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 36(3), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Wim Verbeke & Ronald W. Ward & Jacques Viaene, 2000. "Probit analysis of fresh meat consumption in Belgium: Exploring BSE and television communication impact," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(2), pages 215-234.
    18. Perengki Susanto & Mohammad Enamul Hoque & Verselly Nisaa & Md Asadul Islam & Yusniza Kamarulzaman, 2023. "Predicting m-Commerce Continuance Intention and Price Sensitivity in Indonesia by Integrating of Expectation-Confirmation and Post-acceptance Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    19. Rodríguez, Elsa Mirta M. & Lupín, Beatriz & Lacaze, María Victoria, 2007. "Los atributos de calidad en el consumo de alimentos diferenciados: aplicación de metodologías de evaluación e implicancias de política," Nülan. Deposited Documents 797, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    20. Catherine J. Morrison Paul, 2001. "Cost Economies And Market Power: The Case Of The U.S. Meat Packing Industry," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(3), pages 531-540, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:aarmap:0075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Helle Vinbaek Stenholt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hahoadk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.