IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajarec/v36y1992i3p233-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Consumer Choice Process To Aggregate Analysis: Marketing Insights For Models Of Meat Demand

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas E. Piggott
  • Victor E. Wright

Abstract

The presence or absence of structural change in meat demand is critical to marketing decision making. If change is present, marketing bodies need to know what underlies the change so that the most appropriate response can be identified. Marketing theory is considered as a possible source of more explicit models of demand which may lead to a better understanding of consumption patterns and structural change.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas E. Piggott & Victor E. Wright, 1992. "From Consumer Choice Process To Aggregate Analysis: Marketing Insights For Models Of Meat Demand," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 36(3), pages 233-248, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:36:y:1992:i:3:p:233-248
    DOI: j.1467-8489.1992.tb00521.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-8489.1992.tb00521.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/j.1467-8489.1992.tb00521.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giancarlo Moschini & Karl D. Meilke, 1989. "Modeling the Pattern of Structural Change in U.S. Meat Demand," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(2), pages 253-261.
    2. Urbany, Joel E & Dickson, Peter R, 1991. "Consumer Normal Price Estimation: Market versus Personal Standards," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 45-51, June.
    3. Cohen, Joel B & Basu, Kunal, 1987. "Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(4), pages 455-472, March.
    4. Chalfant, James A & Alston, Julian M, 1988. "Accounting for Changes in Tastes," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(2), pages 391-410, April.
    5. Hauser, John R., 1985. "Agendas and consumer choice," Working papers 1641-85., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    6. Johnson, Michael D, 1989. "The Differential Processing of Product Category and Noncomparable Choice Alternatives," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(3), pages 300-309, December.
    7. McAlister, Leigh & Pessemier, Edgar, 1982. "Variety Seeking Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Review," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(3), pages 311-322, December.
    8. Alston, Julian M. & Chalfant, James A., 1991. "Can We Take The Con Out Of Meat Demand Studies?," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(01), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Nickols, Sharon Y & Fox, Karen D, 1983. "Buying Time and Saving Time: Strategies for Managing Household Production," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 197-208, September.
    10. Verma, Vinod K, 1980. "A Price Theoretic Approach to the Specification and Estimation of the Sales-Advertising Function," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(3), pages 115-137, July.
    11. Jackson, Ralph W & McDaniel, Stephen W & Rao, C P, 1985. "Food Shopping and Preparation: Psychographic Differences of Working Wives and Housewives," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(1), pages 110-113, June.
    12. Park, C Whan & Smith, Daniel C, 1989. "Product-Level Choice: A Top-Down or Bottom-Up Process?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(3), pages 289-299, December.
    13. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 132-132.
    14. Donald W. K. Andrews & Ray C. Fair, 1988. "Inference in Nonlinear Econometric Models with Structural Change," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 55(4), pages 615-640.
    15. Anderson, Eugene W & Shugan, Steven M, 1991. "Repositioning for Changing Preferences: The Case of Beef versus Poultry," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 219-232, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rieger, Jorg & Kuhlgatz, Christian, 2015. "Analyzing Consumer Demand During a Food Scandal: The Case of Dioxin Contaminated Feed in Germany and the Media," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212292, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Hailu, Getu & Goddard, Ellen W., 2010. "The changing egg demand in Canada: do advertising and health message contents matter?," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116427, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Halbrendt, Catherine K. & Pesek, John D., Jr. & Parsons, April & Lindner, Robert K., 1994. "Consumer Preference For Pst-Supplement Pork," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 38(2), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Pearson, David, 2003. "Australia Fresh fruits and vegetables: Why do so many of them remain unbranded?," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 11.
    5. Owen, Kate M. & Griffith, Garry R. & Wright, Vic, 2002. "One little Lebanese cucumber is not going to break the bank: Price in the choice of fresh fruits and vegetables," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(2), pages 1-23.
    6. Pearson, David, 2005. "Marketing Fresh Fruits And Vegetables: Exploration Of Individual Product Characteristics And Their Relationship To Buyer's Attention To Price," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 13.
    7. Farrell, Terence C., 2001. "Modelling Meat Quality Attributes," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 125624, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Cortez & Ben Senauer, 1996. "Taste Changes in the Demand for Food by Demographic Groups in the United States: A Nonparametric Empirical Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(2), pages 280-289.
    2. Paul Cashin, 1991. "A Model Of The Disaggregated Demand For Meat In Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 35(3), pages 263-283, December.
    3. Devetag, M Giovanna, 1999. "From Utilities to Mental Models: A Critical Survey on Decision Rules and Cognition in Consumer Choice," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 8(2), pages 289-351, June.
    4. Poray, Michael C. & Foster, Kenneth A. & Dorfman, Jeffrey H., 2000. "Measuring An Almost Ideal Demand System With Generalized Flexible Least Squares," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21796, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Alston, Julian M. & Chalfant, James A., 1992. "Consumer Demand Analysis According To Garp," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Frechette, Darren L. & Jin, Hyun-Joung, 2002. "Distinguishing transitory nonlinear shocks from permanent structural change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 231-248, June.
    7. Wildner, Susanne, 2001. "Quantifizierung der Preis– und Ausgabenelastizitäten für Nahrungsmittel in Deutschland: Schätzung eines LA/AIDS," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(05), pages 1-11.
    8. Alston, Julian M. & Chalfant, James A. & Rhamezani, Ahmand, 1991. "Testing the Translog and Almost Ideal Specifications in Demand Systems," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271253, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Goodwin, Barry K., 1992. "Forecasting Cattle Prices in the Presence of Structural Change," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 11-22, December.
    10. Hsu, Jane Lu, 2000. "Gradual Switching Structural Changes of Meat Consumption in Taiwan," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123663, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    11. William A. Barnett & Isaac Kalonda Kanyama, 2013. "Time-varying parameters in the almost ideal demand system and the Rotterdam model: will the best specification please stand up?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(29), pages 4169-4183, October.
    12. Moschini, Giancarlo, 1991. "Testing for Preference Change in Consumer Demand: An Indirectly Separable, Semiparametric Model," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 9(1), pages 111-117, January.
    13. Hahn, William F., 2001. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation Of A Random Coefficient Meat Demand System," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20573, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Jin, Hyun Joung & Sun, Changyou & Koo, Won W., 2003. "The Effect Of Food-Safety Related Information On Consumer Preference: The Case Of The Bse Outbreak In Japan," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23636, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    15. Jensen, Birger Boutrup & Grunert, Klaus G., 2014. "Price Knowledge During Grocery Shopping: What We Learn and What We Forget," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 332-346.
    16. Hailu, Getu & Goddard, Ellen W., 2010. "The changing egg demand in Canada: do advertising and health message contents matter?," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116427, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Philippe Jourdan, 2002. "De la marque en capitales vers le capital marque : quoi de neuf depuis les travaux du MSI ?," Post-Print hal-01134684, HAL.
    18. Goddard, Ellen W. & Shank, Benjamin & Panter, Chris & Nilsson, Tomas K.H. & Cash, Sean B., 2007. "Canadian Chicken Industry: Consumer Preferences, Industry Structure and Producer Benefits from Investment in Research and Advertising," Project Report Series 52088, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    19. Piggott, Nicholas E. & Marsh, Thomas L., 2001. "Impacts of Food Safety on U.S. Meat Demand," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 125781, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    20. Huang, Kuo S. & Hahn, William F., 1995. "U.S. Quarterly Demand for Meats," Technical Bulletins 156769, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:36:y:1992:i:3:p:233-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.