IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00743367.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Eco-Districts And Sustainable Cities - Institutionalization Through Experimentation

Author

Listed:
  • Susse Georg

    (Department of Development and Planning - AAU - Aalborg University [Denmark])

  • Gabriela Garza de Linde

    (Department of Organization - CBS - Copenhagen Business School [Copenhagen])

  • Rebecca Pinheiro-Croisel

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Franck Aggeri

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Judging from the number of communities and cities striving or claiming to be sustainable and how often eco-development is invoked as the means for urban regeneration, it appears that sustainable and eco-development have become "the leading paradigm within urban development" (Whitehead 2003). But what is it that is driving these urban transformations? Clearly, there are many probable answers to this complex question and in what follows we will focus on one particular catalyst of change - urban design competitions. Considered as field changing events (Lampel & Meyer 2008, Anand and Jones 2008), urban design competitions are understudied mechanisms for bringing about field level changes. This paper examines how urban design competitions can bring about changes within two types of fields - professional fields and local geographical fields. The context for our study is urban regeneration in two cities in France and Denmark, both of which have been suffering from industrial decline and have invested in establishing "eco-districts". Based on these two case studies we explore how the different parties involved in these urban development projects have developed innovative design templates and practices that can instantiate field level changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Susse Georg & Gabriela Garza de Linde & Rebecca Pinheiro-Croisel & Franck Aggeri, 2011. "Eco-Districts And Sustainable Cities - Institutionalization Through Experimentation," Post-Print halshs-00743367, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00743367
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00743367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00743367/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Youngjin Yoo & Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen, 2006. "From Organization Design to Organization Designing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 215-229, April.
    2. N. Anand & Brittany C. Jones, 2008. "Tournament Rituals, Category Dynamics, and Field Configuration: The Case of the Booker Prize," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1036-1060, September.
    3. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    4. Sara González, 2011. "Bilbao and Barcelona ‘In Motion’ How Urban Regeneration ‘Models’ Travel and Mutate in the Global Flows of Policy Tourism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(7), pages 1397-1418, May.
    5. Raghu Garud, 2008. "Conferences as Venues for the Configuration of Emerging Organizational Fields: The Case of Cochlear Implants," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1061-1088, September.
    6. Mary Ann Glynn, 2008. "Configuring the Field of Play: How Hosting the Olympic Games Impacts Civic Community," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1117-1146, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernard Leca & Charles-Clemens Rüling & Dominique Puthod, 2015. "Animated Times: Critical Transitions and the Maintenance of Field-Configuring Events," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01280882, HAL.
    2. Paul‐Brian McInerney, 2008. "Showdown at Kykuit: Field‐Configuring Events as Loci for Conventionalizing Accounts," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1089-1116, September.
    3. Möllering, Guido & Müller-Seitz, Gordon, 2018. "Direction, not destination: Institutional work practices in the face of field-level uncertainty," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 28-37.
    4. Joseph Lampel & Alan D. Meyer, 2008. "Guest Editors’ Introduction," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1025-1035, September.
    5. Bernard Leca & Charles-Clemens Rüling & Dominique Puthod, 2015. "Animated Times: Critical Transitions and the Maintenance of Field-Configuring Events," Post-Print hal-01280882, HAL.
    6. Amalya L Oliver & Kathleen Montgomery, 2008. "Using Field‐Configuring Events for Sense‐Making: A Cognitive Network Approach," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1147-1167, September.
    7. Tammar B. Zilber, 2011. "Institutional Multiplicity in Practice: A Tale of Two High-Tech Conferences in Israel," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1539-1559, December.
    8. Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo, 2007. "Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 631-647, August.
    9. Guido Möllering, 2011. "Umweltbeeinflussung durch Events? Institutionalisierungsarbeit und feldkonfigurierende Veranstaltungen in organisationalen Feldern," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(5), pages 458-484, August.
    10. N. Anand & Brittany C. Jones, 2008. "Tournament Rituals, Category Dynamics, and Field Configuration: The Case of the Booker Prize," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1036-1060, September.
    11. Gaim, Medhanie & Wåhlin, Nils, 2016. "In search of a creative space: A conceptual framework of synthesizing paradoxical tensions," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 33-44.
    12. Heracleous, Loizos & Papachroni, Angeliki & Andriopoulos, Constantine & Gotsi, Manto, 2017. "Structural ambidexterity and competency traps: Insights from Xerox PARC," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 327-338.
    13. Robert D. Austin & Lee Devin & Erin E. Sullivan, 2012. "Accidental Innovation: Supporting Valuable Unpredictability in the Creative Process," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1505-1522, October.
    14. Palmer, Mark & Toral, Inci & Truong, Yann & Lowe, Fiona, 2022. "Institutional pioneers and articulation work in digital platform infrastructure-building," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 930-945.
    15. Davies, Andrew & Manning, Stephan & Söderlund, Jonas, 2018. "When neighboring disciplines fail to learn from each other: The case of innovation and project management research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 965-979.
    16. Gibson Rachael & Bathelt Harald, 2014. "Field configuration or field reproduction?," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 58(1), pages 216-231, October.
    17. Mary Ann Glynn, 2008. "Configuring the Field of Play: How Hosting the Olympic Games Impacts Civic Community," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1117-1146, September.
    18. Lange Bastian & Suwala Lech & Power Dominic, 2014. "Geographies of field-configuring events," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 58(1), pages 187-201, October.
    19. Anita Williams Woolley & Erica Fuchs, 2011. "PERSPECTIVE---Collective Intelligence in the Organization of Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1359-1367, October.
    20. Marie-Josée SCOTTO & Dominique BONET FERNANDEZ & Hervé TIFFON, 2014. "Le rôle des évaluations externes dans le développement des politiques RSE en France : Quel crédit pour les Prix ?," Working Papers 2014-134, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00743367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.