IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/gemwpa/hal-00815506.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Diagnostiquer la proximité perçue en vente directe de produits alimentaires

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Herault

    (UMR MOISA - Marchés, Organisations, Institutions et Stratégies d'Acteurs - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - Montpellier SupAgro - Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques - CIHEAM-IAMM - Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier - CIHEAM - Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier)

  • Aurelie Merle

    (MKT - Marketing - EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management)

  • Anne-Hélène Prigent-Simonin

    (COACTIS - COnception de l'ACTIon en Situation - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne)

Abstract

Assessing the perceived proximity in direct selling of food products In line with the Editorial of Décisions Marketing "Is proximity a new marketing trend?", the aim of this article is to question the managerial relevance of the concept of proximity within the context of direct selling of food products. Through empirical studies in three supply chains - French CSA (AMAP), farm shops and direct selling on markets- we show the interest of assessing perceived proximity since it has a positive influence on consumers trust towards the studied supply chains and allows to discriminate them. The relevance of the concept of proximity being supported, recommendations are then emphasized on two points: which kinds of proximity to encourage and how to enhance proximity in food direct selling.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Herault & Aurelie Merle & Anne-Hélène Prigent-Simonin, 2013. "Diagnostiquer la proximité perçue en vente directe de produits alimentaires," Working paper serie RMT - Grenoble Ecole de Management hal-00815506, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:gemwpa:hal-00815506
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://hal.grenoble-em.com/hal-00815506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hal.grenoble-em.com/hal-00815506/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Filser & Eric Vernette, 2010. "La proximité est-elle seulement une nouvelle mode du marketing?," Post-Print halshs-01288248, HAL.
    2. Gilles Maréchal, 2008. "Les circuits courts alimentaires," Post-Print hal-01522210, HAL.
    3. Andre Torre & Alain Rallet, 2005. "Proximity and Localization," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 47-59.
    4. Lucy Jarosz, 2000. "Understanding agri-food networks as social relations," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 17(3), pages 279-283, September.
    5. Marc Filser & Eric Vernette, 2010. "La proximité est-elle seulement une nouvelle mode du marketing ?," Post-Print halshs-02913286, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Herault & Aurelie Merle & Anne-Hélène Prigent-Simonin, 2013. "Diagnostiquer la proximité perçue en vente directe de produits alimentaires," Working Papers hal-00815506, HAL.
    2. Claire Capo & Odile Chanut, 2012. "Convenience ensued from proximity: a new analysis framework for Japanese distribution system [Quand la proximité crée la convenience : une grille de lecture du système de distribution japonais]," Post-Print hal-01597651, HAL.
    3. Dominique Feillet & Nabil Absi & Sylvain Housseman & Xavier Libeaut & Federico Rodes & Odile Chanut & Claire Capo & Isabelle Bardin & Emmanuelle Moesch, 2014. "Down Town Purchase Porterage Services [Le portage d'achat en Centre-ville, vers la mise en place d'un service de proximité de centre-ville, Rapport scientifique]," Working Papers hal-01746013, HAL.
    4. Marius Chevallier & Julien Dellier & Gaël Plumecocq & Frédéric Richard, 2014. "Dynamiques et structuration des circuits courts agroalimentaires en Limousin : distance institutionnelle, proximités spatiale et relationnelle," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 16(3), pages 339-362.
    5. Claire Capo & Odile Chanut & Virginie Noireaux & Jean-François Toti, 2014. "Proximité identitaire et comportement du consommateur dans la supply chain," Post-Print hal-01739515, HAL.
    6. Scheffer, Sandrine & Dalido, Anne-Laure, 2010. "Observer les circuits courts à l’échelle d’un territoire : proposition d’un modèle d’analyse spatiale des données, en termes de systèmes d’information géographique," 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy 95005, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Shahzad Khurram & Sandra Charreire Petit, 2017. "Investigating the Dynamics of Stakeholder Salience: What Happens When the Institutional Change Process Unfolds?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 485-515, July.
    8. Secondo Rolfo & Sara Pavone & Gian Franco Corio, 2013. "Selling at farmer’s markets: the case of Turin," CERIS Working Paper 201319, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    9. Ouellet, F. & Mundler, P. & Dupras, J. & Ruiz, J., 2020. "“Community developed and farmer delivered.” An analysis of the spatial and relational proximities of the Alternative Land Use Services program in Ontario," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. de Jong, Jeroen P.J. & Freel, Mark, 2010. "Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 47-54, February.
    11. Philippe DUEZ, 2015. "The Role Of The Culture In The Innovation Management," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 489-495, November.
    12. Lorenzo Cassi & Anne Plunket, 2014. "Proximity, network formation and inventive performance: in search of the proximity paradox," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), pages 395-422, September.
    13. Laurent R. Bergé, 2017. "Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(4), pages 785-815, November.
    14. Alain Thierstein & Stefan Lüthi, 2012. "Interlocking Firm Networks in the German Knowledge Economy: The Case of the Emerging Mega-city Region of Munich," Chapters, in: Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Creative Knowledge Cities, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Sophie Masson & Romain Petiot, 2012. "Territorial Attractiveness, Logistical Facilities And Sustainable Development [Attractivité territoriale, infrastructures logistiques et développement durable]," Post-Print hal-04153018, HAL.
    16. Ferretti, Marco & Guerini, Massimiliano & Panetti, Eva & Parmentola, Adele, 2022. "The partner next door? The effect of micro-geographical proximity on intra-cluster inter-organizational relationships," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    17. Tom Broekel & Wladimir Mueller, 2018. "Critical links in knowledge networks – What about proximities and gatekeeper organisations?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(10), pages 919-939, November.
    18. Ron Boschma & Ron Martin, 2010. "The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Aguiléra, Anne & Guillot, Caroline & Rallet, Alain, 2012. "Mobile ICTs and physical mobility: Review and research agenda," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 664-672.
    20. Glückler Johannes & Panitz Robert, 2015. "Beobachtung, Begegnung und Beziehung," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 59(1), pages 20-33, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:gemwpa:hal-00815506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.