IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2311.07072.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technostress and Job Performance: Understanding the Negative Impacts and Strategic Responses in the Workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Armita Atrian
  • Saleh Ghobbeh

Abstract

This study delves into the increasingly pertinent issue of technostress in the workplace and its multifaceted impact on job performance. Technostress, emerging from the rapid integration of technology in professional settings, is identified as a significant stressor affecting employees across various industries. The research primarily focuses on the ways in which technostress influences job performance, both negatively and positively, depending on the context and individual coping mechanisms. Through a blend of qualitative and quantitative methodologies, including surveys and in-depth interviews, the study examines the experiences of employees from diverse sectors. It highlights how technostress manifests in different forms: from anxiety and frustration due to constant connectivity to the pressure of adapting to new technologies. The paper also explores the dual role of technology as both a facilitator and a hindrance in the workplace. Significant findings indicate that technostress adversely impacts job performance, leading to decreased productivity, diminished job satisfaction, and increased turnover intentions. However, the study also uncovers that strategic interventions, such as training programs, supportive leadership, and fostering a positive technological culture, can mitigate these negative effects. These interventions not only help in managing technostress but also in harnessing the potential of technology for enhanced job performance. Furthermore, the research proposes a model outlining the relationship between technostress, coping mechanisms, and job performance. This model serves as a framework for organizations to understand and address the challenges posed by technostress. The study concludes with recommendations for future research, particularly in exploring the long-term effects of technostress and the efficacy of various coping strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Armita Atrian & Saleh Ghobbeh, 2023. "Technostress and Job Performance: Understanding the Negative Impacts and Strategic Responses in the Workplace," Papers 2311.07072, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.07072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.07072
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riggle, Robert J. & Edmondson, Diane R. & Hansen, John D., 2009. "A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 1027-1030, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Sun, 2019. "Perceived Organizational Support: A Literature Review," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(3), pages 155-175, December.
    2. Hope, Ole-Kristian & Su, Xijiang, 2021. "Peer-level analyst transitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Nick Drydakis, 2019. "School‐Age Bullying, Workplace Bullying and Job Satisfaction: Experiences of LGB People in Britain," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 87(4), pages 455-488, July.
    4. Azman Ismail & Fara Farihana Suhaim & Rizal Abu Bakar & Mohamad Azhari Abu Bakar, 2013. "The Role of Organizational Humanistic Social Support in Decreasing the Interference of Work Problems on Employees’ Family Conflict," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 9(1), pages 5-20, February.
    5. Arieana Thompson & Valentina Bruk-Lee, 2021. "Employee Happiness: Why We Should Care," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(4), pages 1419-1437, August.
    6. Tekleab, Amanuel G. & Chiaburu, Dan S., 2011. "Social exchange: Empirical examination of form and focus," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 460-466, May.
    7. Joseph G. L. Lee & Christopher J. Purcell & Beth H. Chaney, 2017. "An Experiment Assessing Punitive versus Wellness Framing of a Tobacco-Free Campus Policy on Students’ Perceived Level of University Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-8, August.
    8. Hamori, Monika, 2023. "Self-directed learning in massive open online courses and its application at the workplace: Does employer support matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Adnan ul Haque & Fred Yamoah, 2014. "Gender Employment Longevity: I.T Staff Response to Organizational Support in Pakistan," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(12), pages 324-347, December.
    10. Shen, Yimo & Jackson, Todd & Ding, Cody & Yuan, Denghua & Zhao, Lei & Dou, Yunlai & Zhang, Qinglin, 2014. "Linking perceived organizational support with employee work outcomes in a Chinese context: Organizational identification as a mediator," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 406-412.
    11. Lilian DE MENEZES, 2010. "Can a Gift-Exchange Model Explain a Link Between Flexible Working Arrangements and Organizational Performance?," EcoMod2010 259600043, EcoMod.
    12. Javier Turienzo & Pablo Cabanelas & Jesús F. Lampón, 2022. "The Mobility Industry Trends Through the Lens of the Social Analysis: A Multi-Level Perspective Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    13. Priyanko Guchait & Ki-Joon Back, 2016. "Three country study: impact of support on employee attitudes," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7-8), pages 299-318, June.
    14. Leonel Prieto & Muhammad Ruhul Amin & Arman Canatay, 2022. "Examining Social Sustainability in Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-43, September.
    15. Gail Pacheco & De Wet van der Westhuizen & Don J. Webber, 2012. "The changing influence of culture on job satisfaction across Europe: 1981-2008," Working Papers 2012-06, Auckland University of Technology, Department of Economics.
    16. Tahir Farid & Sadaf Iqbal & Jianhong Ma & Sandra Castro-González & Amira Khattak & Muhammad Khalil Khan, 2019. "Employees’ Perceptions of CSR, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Effects of Organizational Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Zagenczyk, Thomas J. & Scott, Kristin D. & Gibney, Ray & Murrell, Audrey J. & Thatcher, Jason Bennett, 2010. "Social influence and perceived organizational support: A social networks analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 127-138, March.
    18. Alexander P. Schudey & Ove Jensen & Nils D. Kraiczy, 2013. "Expatriates-Training = Expatriates-Einsatzerfolg? Eine Metaanalyse," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 518-552, November.
    19. Sean A. Way & Tony Simons & Hannes Leroy & Elizabeth A. Tuleja, 2018. "What is in it for Me? Middle Manager Behavioral Integrity and Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 765-777, July.
    20. Pinna, Roberta & De Simone, Silvia & Cicotto, Gianfranco & Malik, Ashish, 2020. "Beyond organisational support: Exploring the supportive role of co-workers and supervisors in a multi-actor service ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 524-534.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.07072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.