IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/educat/v1y2021i1p55-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Learning Practices in Public Higher Education Institutions of Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Tafesse, Mebratu

Abstract

In this study, quantitative research design was employed to examine the relationship between organizational learning practices and institutional performance in Public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) of Ethiopia. The study investigated: individual, group and organizational level learning practice and their relationship with institutional performance. Data gathered from a 69 item survey questionnaire administrated to 461 academic staff randomly chosen from seven sample public universities from three generations. The finding of the study revealed that individual level learning practice is low, instructors (M=3.67: SD= .562) and academic leaders (M=3.80: SD= .652); group level learning practice is low, instructors (M=3.07, SD=.567) and academic leaders (M = 3.28, SD =.661) and organization level learning is poorly practiced, instructors (M=3.34, SD=.519) and academic leaders (M = 3.58, SD =.670), in public HEIs. In general, it was found that organization learning practice is insufficient, weak and poorly practiced in HEIs as agreed by instructors (M=3.35, SD=.427) and academic leaders (M = 3.56, SD =.581) . It was also concluded that the institutional ability of HEIs to learn from past experiences was insufficient and HEIs were not capable in sharing and utilizing the existing knowledge to create new knowledge to improve institutional practices. Besides, the existing leadership practices, learning infrastructures and technologies could not sufficiently support in transforming HEIs into learning organizations. Therefore, it was suggested that HEIs have to encourage shared and participatory decision-making process; create efficient system and work culture which promote cooperation, trust , team sprit among academic staff and across different disciplines, create long term strategic partnerships with external institutions and facilitate academic mobility and experience sharing activities. Furthermore, learning efforts and outcomes have to be valued and rewarded; technologies and learning infrastructures have be sufficiently developed to support organization wide learning and institutional performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tafesse, Mebratu, 2021. "Organizational Learning Practices in Public Higher Education Institutions of Ethiopia," Technium Education and Humanities, Technium Science, vol. 1(1), pages 55-78.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:educat:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:55-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/education/article/view/6126
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/education/article/view/6126
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Bontis & Mary M. Crossan & John Hulland, 2002. "Managing An Organizational Learning System By Aligning Stocks and Flows," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 437-469, June.
    2. Goh, Swee & Richards, Gregory, 1997. "Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 575-583, October.
    3. Peter Materu, 2007. "Higher Education Quality Assurance in Sub-Saharan Africa : Status, Challenges, Opportunities, and Promising Practices," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6757.
    4. David Cayla, 2008. "Organizational Learning: A Process between Equilibrium and Evolution," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 553-559, June.
    5. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    6. Skerlavaj, Miha & Stemberger, Mojca Indihar & Skrinjar, Rok & Dimovski, Vlado, 2007. "Organizational learning culture--the missing link between business process change and organizational performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 346-367, April.
    7. Argote, Linda & Ingram, Paul, 2000. "Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 150-169, May.
    8. Jerez-Gomez, Pilar & Cespedes-Lorente, Jose & Valle-Cabrera, Ramon, 2005. "Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 715-725, June.
    9. George P. Huber, 1991. "Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 88-115, February.
    10. Mark Easterby‐Smith & Mary Crossan & Davide Nicolini, 2000. "Organizational Learning: Debates Past, Present And Future," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 783-796, September.
    11. Tian, Lili & Wilding, Gregory E., 2008. "Confidence interval estimation of a common correlation coefficient," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 4872-4877, June.
    12. Andrew C. Inkpen & Mary M. Crossan, 1995. "Believing Is Seeing: Joint Ventures and Organization Learning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 595-618, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra Luciana GUTA, 2018. "Organizational Learning Capability. Model Testing In Universities," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 229-240, September.
    2. Linda Argote & Ella Miron-Spektor, 2011. "Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1123-1137, October.
    3. Covin, Jeffrey G. & Garrett, Robert P. & Kuratko, Donald F. & Shepherd, Dean A., 2020. "Short leash or long leash? Parenting style, initial strategic clarity, and the development of venture learning proficiency," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    4. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    5. Jiménez-Jiménez, Daniel & Sanz-Valle, Raquel, 2011. "Innovation, organizational learning, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 408-417, April.
    6. Krishnan Hariharan & Vivekanand G, 2018. "Perspectives on Organizational Learning," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 9(1), pages 81-86, January.
    7. Alexandra Luciana GUȚĂ, 2014. "Ways Of Managing Organizational Learning," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4, pages 257-266, July.
    8. Dev K. Dutta & Mary M. Crossan, 2005. "The Nature of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: Understanding the Process Using the 4I Organizational Learning Framework," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 425-449, July.
    9. Alexandra Luciana Gu??, 2015. "An analysis of factors that influence organizational learning: The case of higher education institutions," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 1003387, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    10. Ana Villar & César Camisón & Montserrat Boronat, 2007. "Technical Strategic Alliances And Performance: The Mediating Effect Of Knowledge ¿Based Competencies," Working Papers. Serie EC 2007-11, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    11. Bhatti, Waheed Akbar & Larimo, Jorma & Coudounaris, Dafnis N., 2016. "The effect of experiential learning on subsidiary knowledge and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1567-1571.
    12. Joaquín Camps & Antonio Majocchi, 2010. "Learning Atmosphere and Ethical Behavior, Does It Make Sense?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 129-147, June.
    13. Mouaz Alsabbagh & Abdul Hamid AL Khalil, 2017. "The Impact of Organizational Culture on Organizational Learning (An Empirical Study on the Education Sector in Damascus City)," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 579-600, April.
    14. Nancy Beauregard & Louise Lemyre & Jacques Barrette, 2015. "The Domains of Organizational Learning Practices: An Agency-Structure Perspective," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Agulles, Remei & Prats, Mª Julia, 2011. "Learning in practice: What organizational and management literature can contribute to professional and occupational development," IESE Research Papers D/938, IESE Business School.
    16. Akram Hasan Aljaffan, 2017. "A Review of the Tripartite Model Linking Associations between TQM, Organizational Learning, and Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(8), pages 11-30, August.
    17. Ming Gu & Edison Tse, 2010. "Building innovative organizations in China: The “execution+” organization," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 25-53, March.
    18. Joel A. C. Baum & Paul Ingram, 1998. "Survival-Enhancing Learning in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898--1980," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(7), pages 996-1016, July.
    19. Ang, Siah Hwee & Benischke, Mirko H. & Hooi, Andrea Wai-Leng, 2018. "Frequency of international expansion through high control market expansion modes and interlocked directorships," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 493-503.
    20. Devaki Rau & Thorvald Haerem, 2010. "Applying an organizational learning perspective to new technology deployment by technological gatekeepers: A theoretical model and key issues for future research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 287-297, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:educat:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:55-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Maria Golita (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.