IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jorgde/v13y2024i4d10.1007_s41469-024-00170-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The liberated company theoretical concept: current issues and the intimidating complexity of organizational design

Author

Listed:
  • Isaac Getz

    (ESCP Business School)

  • Gilles Arnaud

    (ESCP Business School
    Sorbonne Alliance, LabEx haStec)

Abstract

The “liberated company” (LC) theoretical concept has risen in prominence in French-language research and has been the focus of two systematic literature reviews. Yet, despite over a dozen LC studies in English, it has received little attention internationally. The present paper aims to fill this gap by presenting the background to the LC theoretical concept and by examining five research issues in particular that have emerged since 2009 when the concept was first introduced. Thus, in our view, the most pressing issues are the definition of the LC concept, whether it is a management theory or a model, LC’s contribution to leadership fields, sources and proximate theories with regard to LC, and how to evaluate the concept’s usefulness to organizations. The discussion section builds on the examination of these issues to update the definition of LC. It further discusses how LC can meet the “intimidating complexity of design” challenge and how the impact of the LC concept on the organizational transformation practice can be enhanced.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaac Getz & Gilles Arnaud, 2024. "The liberated company theoretical concept: current issues and the intimidating complexity of organizational design," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 13(4), pages 125-145, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jorgde:v:13:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s41469-024-00170-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s41469-024-00170-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41469-024-00170-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41469-024-00170-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Graham Astley & Raymond F. Zammuto, 1992. "Organization Science, Managers, and Language Games," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 443-460, November.
    2. Paula Cristofalo & Odessa Dariel & Vanessa Durand, 2019. "How Does Social Innovation Cross Borders? Exploring the Diffusion Process of an Alternative Homecare Service in France," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 59-88.
    3. Gazi Islam & Roberta Sferrazzo, 2022. "Workers' Rites: Ritual Mediations and the Tensions of New Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 284-318, March.
    4. Bill Nobles, 2019. "Use hierarchy for “liberating servant leadership” instead of controlling employees," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. Matthieu Battistelli & Anne-Sophie Dubey & Caroline Mattelin-Pierrard, 2023. "Framing Liberation Management as the Bundling of Practices: An Adoption Process with a Two-Fold Coherence [Libérer l’entreprise en lâchant les grappes ? Vers une double cohérence du processus d’ado," Post-Print hal-04033222, HAL.
    6. A. Georges L. Romme, 2019. "Climbing up and down the hierarchy of accountability: implications for organization design," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Libby Weber, 2023. "Hierarchy and managers matter more than ever in the digital age: unexamined psychological transaction costs in bossless companies," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(1), pages 41-45, June.
    8. Frank Martela, 2019. "What makes self-managing organizations novel? Comparing how Weberian bureaucracy, Mintzberg’s adhocracy, and self-organizing solve six fundamental problems of organizing," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Miguel Pina e Cunha & Arménio Rego & Stewart Clegg, 2010. "Obedience and Evil: From Milgram and Kampuchea to Normal Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 291-309, December.
    10. Didier Chabanet & Rodolphe Colle & Isabelle Corbett‐etchevers & Christian Defélix & Céline Perea & Damien Richard Richard, 2017. "Il était une fois les entreprises « libérées » : de la généalogie d’un modèle à l’identification de ses conditions de développement," Post-Print halshs-01678304, HAL.
    11. Isabelle Corbett Etchevers & Céline Perea & Damien Richard & Rodolphe Colle & Christian Defélix, 2019. "Freedom-form organisations, innovation and quality of work life: towards a new model of interaction," Post-Print hal-03982717, HAL.
    12. J. Robert Baum & Stefan Wally, 2003. "Strategic decision speed and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(11), pages 1107-1129, November.
    13. Frank Martela, 2023. "Managers matter less than we think: how can organizations function without any middle management?," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(1), pages 19-25, June.
    14. Ambra Mazzelli, 2023. "Why managers matter: the paradox of organizing," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(1), pages 31-36, June.
    15. Charles C. Snow, 2018. "Research in Journal Of Organization Design, 2012–2018," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Gazi Islam & Roberta Sferrazzo, 2022. "Workers' Rites: Ritual Mediations and the Tensions of New Management," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03602215, HAL.
    17. Harry Hummels & Patrick Nullens, 2022. "‘Other-wise’ Organizing. A Levinasian Approach to Agape in Work and Business Organisations," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 211-232, October.
    18. Nicolai J. Foss, 2003. "Selective Intervention and Internal Hybrids: Interpreting and Learning from the Rise and Decline of the Oticon Spaghetti Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 331-349, June.
    19. Paula Cristofalo & Odessa Petit Dit Dariel & Vanessa Durand, 2019. "How Does Social Innovation Cross Borders? Exploring the Diffusion Process of an Alternative Homecare Service in France [Comment l'innovation sociale traverse les frontières ? Etude exploratoire de ," Post-Print hal-02438048, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolai J. Foss & Peter G. Klein, 2023. "Why Managers Matter matters: replies and reflections," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(1), pages 51-57, June.
    2. Teppo Felin & Nicolai J. Foss, 2009. "Social Reality, the Boundaries of Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, and Economics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 654-668, June.
    3. Pauline Fatien & Dima Louis & Gazi Islam, 2023. "Neutral In‐Tensions: Navigating Neutrality in Coaching," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1485-1520, September.
    4. Oliver Alexy, 2022. "How flat can it get? From better at flatter to the promise of the decentralized, boundaryless organization," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 11(1), pages 31-36, March.
    5. Matthieu Battistelli & Anne-Sophie Dubey & Clara Letierce & Caroline Mattelin-Pierrard, 2024. "Reconciling individual and collective forms of courage in organisations: The extreme case of holacratic managerial practices," Post-Print hal-04883437, HAL.
    6. Brouthers, Lance Eliot & Gao, Yan & Napshin, Stuart, 2014. "Keiretsu centrality — profits and profit stability: A power dependence perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2603-2610.
    7. Robert S. Gibbons & Manuel Grieder & Holger Herz & Christian Zehnder, 2019. "Building an Equilibrium: Rules Versus Principles in Relational Contracts," CESifo Working Paper Series 7871, CESifo.
    8. Gavin M Schwarz & Karin Sanders & Dave Bouckenooghe, 2020. "In the driving seat: Executive’s perceived control over environment," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 317-342, May.
    9. Anders Melander & Tomas Mullern & David Anderssson & Fredrik Elgh & Malin Löfving, 2022. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Collaborative Research—in Dialogues We Trust," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-677, October.
    10. Matanda, Margaret Jekanyika & Freeman, Susan, 2009. "Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter-importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 89-107, February.
    11. Khine Kyaw & Sirimon Treepongkaruna & Pornsit Jiraporn, 2021. "Stakeholder engagement and firms' innovation: Evidence from LGBT‐supportive policies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1285-1298, July.
    12. Clampit, Jack & Gaffney, Nolan & Fabian, Frances & Stafford, Thomas, 2023. "Institutional misalignment and escape-based FDI: A prospect theory lens," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3).
    13. von Siemens, Ferdinand A., 2013. "Intention-based reciprocity and the hidden costs of control," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 55-65.
    14. Petrou, Andreas P. & Hadjielias, Elias & Thanos, Ioannis C. & Dimitratos, Pavlos, 2020. "Strategic decision-making processes, international environmental munificence and the accelerated internationalization of SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    15. Jae-Woong Jeong & Heon-Hwi Lee & Hun Park, 2022. "A Study on the Effect of Knowledge Services on Organizational Performances Based on the Concept of Balanced Scorecards for the Sustainable Growth of Firms: Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G. & Wakefield, James, 2016. "Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-17.
    17. Mészáros, Tamás & Nagy-Borsy, Viktor, 2025. "Technológia a stratégiaalkotásban, avagy a Harvard-iskola újjáéledése [Technology in Strategy Creation, or the Revival of the Harvard School]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 92-111.
    18. João M. S. Carvalho & Célio A. A. Sousa, 2018. "Is Psychological Value a Missing Building Block in Societal Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Jacob Owenga & Rayviscic Mutinda & Isabella Mapelu, 2024. "Moderating Effect of Government Policies and Regulations on the Relationship between Diversification Strategies and Organizational Performance among Star Rated Hotels in the Kenyan Coast," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(1), pages 866-880, January.
    20. Ralf Meinhardt & Sebastian Junge & Martin Weiss, 2018. "The organizational environment with its measures, antecedents, and consequences: a review and research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 195-235, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Liberated company; Less-hierarchical organizing; Organizational design; Transformational leadership;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jorgde:v:13:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s41469-024-00170-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.