IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joamsc/v52y2024i6d10.1007_s11747-024-01013-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Showcase the smiles or the tears? How elicited perspectives determine optimal charity appeal content

Author

Listed:
  • Diogo Hildebrand

    (Baruch College, CUNY)

  • Rhonda Hadi

    (University of Oxford)

  • Sankar Sen

    (Baruch College, CUNY)

Abstract

Some charitable communications employ deprived beneficiary (DB) appeals (showcasing the distressing circumstances of suffering victims), while others feature satiated beneficiary (SB) appeals (depicting the improved state of victims after receiving help). We propose and demonstrate that the relative efficacy of these appeals depends on the perspective viewers are prompted to take. Across three incentive-compatible experiments, we demonstrate that while DB appeals are more effective in increasing donation behavior when an ad evokes a beneficiary-perspective (i.e., asking viewers to imagine how a beneficiary feels), SB appeals are more effective when an ad evokes a self-perspective (i.e., asking viewers to imagine how they themselves would feel if they were in the beneficiary’s position). We also provide evidence for the affect-based mechanism theorized to underlie this basic interaction, and proffer a managerially actionable, ad copy-based moderator.

Suggested Citation

  • Diogo Hildebrand & Rhonda Hadi & Sankar Sen, 2024. "Showcase the smiles or the tears? How elicited perspectives determine optimal charity appeal content," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 1805-1819, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:52:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11747-024-01013-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11747-024-01013-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11747-024-01013-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11747-024-01013-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:52:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11747-024-01013-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.