IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v16y2018i2d10.1007_s10257-017-0357-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: a taxonomy and a reproducible analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Friedrich Chasin

    (University of Muenster)

  • Moritz Hoffen

    (University of Muenster)

  • Marcus Cramer

    (University of Muenster)

  • Martin Matzner

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

Abstract

Airbnb and Uber enable private individuals to share physical resources via their Internet platforms, and both have become popular subjects of information systems and e-business research. In the top dogs’ slipstream resides a variety of less-known platforms that allow to share different resources or to share resources in different ways. Researchers who study these platforms and the underlying consumer behaviors face the problem of situating their findings precisely. Practitioners lack an overview of the diversity of these platforms and their characteristics too. This article suggests a taxonomy that helps to better characterize platforms for Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Sharing and Collaborative Consumption (SCC). We used the taxonomy to describe the evolution of 522 P2P SCC platforms over the period of 35 months and to demonstrate and partly evaluate its application. All descriptions taken together constitute a comprehensive data source to study P2P SCC platforms. When researchers use the taxonomy, they can describe and situate insights precisely so that stakeholders can access them more easily. Furthermore, researchers and practitioners can use our database as well as the analyses we made based on the data for their purpose. Because we deliver the computer scripts that we used in our analysis, our study can easily be reproduced in the future to investigate the dynamics of the P2P SCC market.

Suggested Citation

  • Friedrich Chasin & Moritz Hoffen & Marcus Cramer & Martin Matzner, 2018. "Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: a taxonomy and a reproducible analysis," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 293-325, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:16:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-017-0357-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-017-0357-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-017-0357-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-017-0357-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Tencati & Laszlo Zsolnai, 2012. "Collaborative Enterprise and Sustainability: The Case of Slow Food," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 345-354, October.
    2. Jean-Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2003. "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 990-1029, June.
    3. Viviane Chen, 2009. "Possession and access : consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits," Post-Print hal-00778657, HAL.
    4. Yu Chen, 2009. "Possession and Access: Consumer Desires and Value Perceptions Regarding Contemporary Art Collection and Exhibit Visits," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(6), pages 925-940, April.
    5. Kreyer, Nina & Pousttchi, Key & Turowski, Klaus, 2002. "Standardized Payment Procedures as Key Enabling Factor for Mobile Commerce," MPRA Paper 2910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2012. "Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 881-898.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dennis Kundisch & Jan Muntermann & Anna Maria Oberländer & Daniel Rau & Maximilian Röglinger & Thorsten Schoormann & Daniel Szopinski, 2022. "An Update for Taxonomy Designers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(4), pages 421-439, August.
    2. Bauwens, Thomas & Hekkert, Marko & Kirchherr, Julian, 2020. "Circular futures: What Will They Look Like?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Thomas Derave & Tiago Princes Sales & Frederik Gailly & Geert Poels, 2022. "Sharing Platform Ontology Development: Proof-of-Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruna Bruno & Marisa Faggini, 2017. "Sharing Economy: For an Economic Taxonomy," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 174-178, June.
    2. Alain Debenedetti & Harmen Oppewal & Zeynep Arsel, 2014. "Place Attachment in Commercial Settings: A Gift Economy Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(5), pages 904-923.
    3. Meina Zhao & Jing Wang & Heng Zhang & Gang Zhao, 2019. "ERP Perspective Analysis of PSS Component and Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Park, Hyejune & Joyner Armstrong, Cosette M., 2019. "Will “no-ownership†work for apparel?: Implications for apparel retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 66-73.
    5. Craig Standing & Ferry Jie & Thi Le & Susan Standing & Sharon Biermann, 2021. "Analysis of the Use and Perception of Shared Mobility: A Case Study in Western Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Anna Jasinska-Biliczak, 2020. "TRIBE 2.0 – The Microcommunity Needs in the Frames of the Sharing Economy Concept," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 75-84.
    7. Mike Molesworth & Rebecca Watkins & Janice Denegri-Knott, 2016. "Possession Work on Hosted Digital Consumption Objects as Consumer Ensnarement," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 246-261.
    8. Loussaïef, Leïla & Ulrich, Isabelle & Damay, Coralie, 2019. "How does access to luxury fashion challenge self-identity? Exploring women's practices of joint and non-ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 263-272.
    9. Hung-Tai Tsou & Ja-Shen Chen & Cindy Yunhsin Chou & Tzu-Wen Chen, 2019. "Sharing Economy Service Experience and Its Effects on Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    10. Giovanna Magnani & Beatrice Re, 2020. "Lived experiences about car sharing in young adults: Emerging paradoxes," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(2), pages 207-229, September.
    11. Giovanna Magnani & Tommaso Bertolotti & Antonella Zucchella, 2018. "Cognitive aspects of car sharing in Millennials. Active sharers and reluctant users," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 39-62.
    12. Jiong Sun & Hendrarto Supangkat & Siva Balasubramanian, 2016. "Peer-to-Peer Sharing of Private Goods: Sellers’ Response and Consumers’ Benefits," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 262-276.
    13. Jaakko Aspara & Kristina Wittkowski & Vicki G Morwitz & J Jeffrey Inman & Olivier Toubia, 2019. "Sharing-Dominant Logic? Quantifying the Association between Consumer Intelligence and Choice of Social Access Modes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(2), pages 201-222.
    14. Daniel Roos & Rüdiger Hahn, 2019. "Understanding Collaborative Consumption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior with Value-Based Personal Norms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 679-697, September.
    15. Luri Minami, Adriana & Ramos, Carla & Bruscato Bortoluzzo, Adriana, 2021. "Sharing economy versus collaborative consumption: What drives consumers in the new forms of exchange?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 124-137.
    16. Francesco Pasimeni, 2020. "The Origin of the Sharing Economy Meets the Legacy of Fractional Ownership," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-19, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    17. Myriam Ertz & Fabien Durif & Manon Arcand, 2019. "A conceptual perspective on collaborative consumption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 27-41, June.
    18. Valentin Clemens & Christopher Albert Sabel & Johann Nils Foege & Stephan Nüesch, 2022. "System Design Choice in the Sharing Economy: How Different Institutional Logics Drive Consumer Perception and Consumers’ Intention to Use Sharing Systems," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 201-234, June.
    19. Habibi, Mohammad Reza & Davidson, Alexander & Laroche, Michel, 2017. "What managers should know about the sharing economy," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 113-121.
    20. Linda L. Price & Russell W. Belk, 2016. "Consumer Ownership and Sharing: Introduction to the Issue," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 193-197.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:16:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-017-0357-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.