IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/2910.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Standardized Payment Procedures as Key Enabling Factor for Mobile Commerce

Author

Listed:
  • Kreyer, Nina
  • Pousttchi, Key
  • Turowski, Klaus

Abstract

Companies are not going to invest into the development of innovative applications or services unless these can be charged for appropriately. Thus, the existence of standardized and widely accepted mobile payment procedures is crucial for successful business-to-customer mobile commerce. In this paper we reflect on the acceptance of mobile payment and examine the characteristics of current mobile payment procedures. The outcomes of the paper are a categorization of current mobile payment procedures with strategic, participation and operational criteria and, based on these results, the derivation of the five mobile payment standard types prepaid, mobile money, conventional settlement, premium rate number and dual-card. Finally, a prospect is given to possible further development of mobile payment procedures in the direction of an integrative universal mobile payment system (UMPS).

Suggested Citation

  • Kreyer, Nina & Pousttchi, Key & Turowski, Klaus, 2002. "Standardized Payment Procedures as Key Enabling Factor for Mobile Commerce," MPRA Paper 2910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:2910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2910/1/MPRA_paper_2910.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pousttchi, Key & Selk, Bernhard & Turowski, Klaus, 2002. "Akzeptanzkriterien für mobile Bezahlverfahren [Acceptance criterias for mobile payment procedures]," MPRA Paper 3785, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Kreyer, Nina & Pousttchi, Key & Turowski, Klaus, 2002. "Characteristics of Mobile Payment Procedures," MPRA Paper 3786, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Pousttchi, Key & Selk, Bernhard & Turowski, Klaus, 2002. "Enabling mobile commerce through mass customization," MPRA Paper 3623, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Friedrich Chasin & Moritz Hoffen & Marcus Cramer & Martin Matzner, 2018. "Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: a taxonomy and a reproducible analysis," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 293-325, May.
    2. Khodawandi, Darius & Pousttchi, Key & Wiedemann, Dietmar Georg, 2003. "Akzeptanz mobiler Bezahlverfahren in Deutschland [Acceptance of Mobile Payment Procedures in Germany]," MPRA Paper 3606, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Lai, Kuei-Kuei & Chen, Yu-Long & Kumar, Vimal & Daim, Tugrul & Verma, Pratima & Kao, Fang-Chen & Liu, Ruirong, 2023. "Mapping technological trajectories and exploring knowledge sources: A case study of E-payment technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    4. Pousttchi, Key & Zenker, M., 2003. "Current Mobile Payment Procedures on the German Market from the View of Customer Requirements," MPRA Paper 2911, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Pousttchi, Key, 2003. "Abrechnung mobiler Mehrwertdienste [Payment of mobile value-added services]," MPRA Paper 3784, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Alireza Nasiri, 2014. "Mobile Learning Business Model Framework," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 6(2), pages 72-87.
    7. Linck, K. & Pousttchi, Key & Wiedemann, Dietmar Georg, 2006. "Security Issues in Mobile Payment from the Customer Viewpoint," MPRA Paper 2923, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Pousttchi, Key & Selk, Bernhard & Turowski, Klaus, 2002. "Akzeptanzkriterien für mobile Bezahlverfahren [Acceptance criterias for mobile payment procedures]," MPRA Paper 3785, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Pousttchi, Key & Schurig, Martin, 2004. "Assessment of Today’s Mobile Banking Applications from the View of Customer Requirements," MPRA Paper 2913, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Pousttchi, Key, 2004. "An Analysis of the Mobile Payment Problem in Europe," MPRA Paper 2915, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khodawandi, Darius & Pousttchi, Key & Wiedemann, Dietmar Georg, 2003. "Akzeptanz mobiler Bezahlverfahren in Deutschland [Acceptance of Mobile Payment Procedures in Germany]," MPRA Paper 3606, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Pousttchi, Key & Selk, Bernhard & Turowski, Klaus, 2002. "Akzeptanzkriterien für mobile Bezahlverfahren [Acceptance criterias for mobile payment procedures]," MPRA Paper 3785, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Pousttchi, Key, 2004. "An Analysis of the Mobile Payment Problem in Europe," MPRA Paper 2915, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Linck, K. & Pousttchi, Key & Wiedemann, Dietmar Georg, 2006. "Security Issues in Mobile Payment from the Customer Viewpoint," MPRA Paper 2923, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Pousttchi, Key & Wiedemann, Dietmar Georg, 2005. "Relativer Vorteil bei mobilen Bezahlverfahren - mobiles Bezahlen aus dem Blickwinkel der Diffusionstheorie [Relative advantage of mobile payment procedures - Mobile Payment from the perspective of ," MPRA Paper 3607, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Kreyer, Nina & Pousttchi, Key & Turowski, Klaus, 2002. "Characteristics of Mobile Payment Procedures," MPRA Paper 3786, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Pousttchi, Key & Weizmann, Moritz & Turowski, Klaus, 2003. "Added Value-based Approach to Analyze Electronic Commerce and Mobile Commerce Business Models," MPRA Paper 3618, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Pousttchi, Key & Zenker, M., 2003. "Current Mobile Payment Procedures on the German Market from the View of Customer Requirements," MPRA Paper 2911, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Valérie-Anne BLEYEN & Leo VAN HOVE & Monika HARTMANN, 2010. "Classifying payment instruments: A matryoshka approach," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(79), pages 73-94, 3rd quart.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:2910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.