IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/doi10.1086-673469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Place Attachment in Commercial Settings: A Gift Economy Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Alain Debenedetti
  • Harmen Oppewal
  • Zeynep Arsel

Abstract

Place attachment is one's strong emotional bond with a specific location. While there are numerous studies on the topic, the literature pays little attention to commercial settings. This is because they are seen as too insipid to rouse attachment. Consumer research, however, suggests otherwise. To address this disparity, the authors investigate how people develop, experience, and act on place attachment in commercial settings. Findings from consumer in-depth interviews and self-reports conducted in France reveal that place attachment develops through perceptions of familiarity, authenticity, and security and evolves into experiences of homeyness. Consumers find these encounters of homeyness extraordinary and respond by engaging in volunteering, over-reciprocation, and ambassadorship toward the place. The authors further theorize these findings through a gift economy perspective and identify a tripartite exchange between the consumer, the proprietor of the place, and selected people from the consumer's social network.

Suggested Citation

  • Alain Debenedetti & Harmen Oppewal & Zeynep Arsel, 2014. "Place Attachment in Commercial Settings: A Gift Economy Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(5), pages 904-923.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/673469
    DOI: 10.1086/673469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/673469
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/673469
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/673469?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnould, Eric J & Price, Linda L, 1993. "River Magic: Extraordinary Experience and the Extended Service Encounter," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(1), pages 24-45, June.
    2. Borghini, Stefania & Diamond, Nina & Kozinets, Robert V. & McGrath, Mary Ann & Muñiz, Albert M. & Sherry, John F., 2009. "Why Are Themed Brandstores So Powerful? Retail Brand Ideology at American Girl Place," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 363-375.
    3. Viviane Chen, 2009. "Possession and access : consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits," Post-Print hal-00778657, HAL.
    4. Yu Chen, 2009. "Possession and Access: Consumer Desires and Value Perceptions Regarding Contemporary Art Collection and Exhibit Visits," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(6), pages 925-940, April.
    5. Véronique Aubert-Gamet & Bernard Cova, 1999. "Servicescapes: From Modern Non-Places to Postmodern Common Places," Post-Print hal-02062421, HAL.
    6. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2012. "Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 881-898.
    7. Michael B. Beverland & Francis J. Farrelly, 2010. "The Quest for Authenticity in Consumption: Consumers' Purposive Choice of Authentic Cues to Shape Experienced Outcomes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(5), pages 838-856, February.
    8. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt & Eric J. Arnould, 2012. "Liquid Relationship to Possessions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 510-529.
    9. Aubert-Gamet, Veronique & Cova, Bernard, 1999. "Servicescapes: From Modern Non-Places to Postmodern Common Places," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 37-45, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jack Coffin & Andreas Chatzidakis, 2021. "The Möbius strip of market spatiality: mobilizing transdisciplinary dialogues between CCT and the marketing mainstream," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 40-59, June.
    2. Mike Molesworth & Rebecca Watkins & Janice Denegri-Knott, 2016. "Possession Work on Hosted Digital Consumption Objects as Consumer Ensnarement," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 246-261.
    3. Loussaïef, Leïla & Ulrich, Isabelle & Damay, Coralie, 2019. "How does access to luxury fashion challenge self-identity? Exploring women's practices of joint and non-ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 263-272.
    4. Giovanna Magnani & Beatrice Re, 2020. "Lived experiences about car sharing in young adults: Emerging paradoxes," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(2), pages 207-229, September.
    5. Giovanna Magnani & Tommaso Bertolotti & Antonella Zucchella, 2018. "Cognitive aspects of car sharing in Millennials. Active sharers and reluctant users," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 39-62.
    6. Myriam Ertz & Fabien Durif & Manon Arcand, 2019. "A conceptual perspective on collaborative consumption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 27-41, June.
    7. Christodoulides, George & Athwal, Navdeep & Boukis, Achilleas & Semaan, Rania W., 2021. "New forms of luxury consumption in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 89-99.
    8. Giovanardi, Massimo & Lucarelli, Andrea, 2018. "Sailing through marketing: A critical assessment of spatiality in marketing literature," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 149-159.
    9. Giovanna Magnani & Beatrice Re, 0. "Lived experiences about car sharing in young adults: Emerging paradoxes," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    10. Meina Zhao & Jing Wang & Heng Zhang & Gang Zhao, 2019. "ERP Perspective Analysis of PSS Component and Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Park, Hyejune & Joyner Armstrong, Cosette M., 2019. "Will “no-ownership†work for apparel?: Implications for apparel retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 66-73.
    12. Friedrich Chasin & Moritz Hoffen & Marcus Cramer & Martin Matzner, 2018. "Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: a taxonomy and a reproducible analysis," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 293-325, May.
    13. Craig Standing & Ferry Jie & Thi Le & Susan Standing & Sharon Biermann, 2021. "Analysis of the Use and Perception of Shared Mobility: A Case Study in Western Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Anna Jasinska-Biliczak, 2020. "TRIBE 2.0 – The Microcommunity Needs in the Frames of the Sharing Economy Concept," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 75-84.
    15. Wei, Wei & Lu, Ying (Tracy) & Miao, Li & Cai, Liping A. & Wang, Chen-ya, 2017. "Customer-customer interactions (CCIs) at conferences: An identity approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 154-170.
    16. Hung-Tai Tsou & Ja-Shen Chen & Cindy Yunhsin Chou & Tzu-Wen Chen, 2019. "Sharing Economy Service Experience and Its Effects on Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    17. Bruna Bruno & Marisa Faggini, 2017. "Sharing Economy: For an Economic Taxonomy," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 174-178, June.
    18. Hietanen, Joel & Mattila, Pekka & Schouten, John W. & Sihvonen, Antti & Toyoki, Sammy, 2016. "Reimagining Society Through Retail Practice," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 411-425.
    19. Jiong Sun & Hendrarto Supangkat & Siva Balasubramanian, 2016. "Peer-to-Peer Sharing of Private Goods: Sellers’ Response and Consumers’ Benefits," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 262-276.
    20. Jaakko Aspara & Kristina Wittkowski & Vicki G Morwitz & J Jeffrey Inman & Olivier Toubia, 2019. "Sharing-Dominant Logic? Quantifying the Association between Consumer Intelligence and Choice of Social Access Modes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(2), pages 201-222.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/673469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.