IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2076-d747357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sharing Platform Ontology Development: Proof-of-Concept

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Derave

    (Department of Business Informatics and Operations Management, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Tiago Princes Sales

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy)

  • Frederik Gailly

    (Department of Business Informatics and Operations Management, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Design & Optimisation Cluster, FlandersMake@UGent—Core Lab CVAMO, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Geert Poels

    (Department of Business Informatics and Operations Management, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Design & Optimisation Cluster, FlandersMake@UGent—Core Lab CVAMO, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

A sharing platform is a digital platform that facilitates access to underutilized goods by renting or lending them to others. Users become less dependent on ownership which improves efficiency, sustainability, and the sense of community. The Sharing Economy (SE) is considered a complex domain because value co-creation can occur between multiple types of platform users. Developing platform software that offers the right functionality for the intended digital platform is therefore challenging. To address this complexity, an ontology can be utilized, which is an explicit specification of a conceptualization that provides a controlled vocabulary and shared meaning regarding a domain. The use of a sharing platform ontology allows for more effective communication and knowledge sharing amongst stakeholders in platform development and eventually drives the platform software development process. However, currently, it is not known how to develop such an ontology. In previous research, we developed the Digital Platform Ontology (DPO) and an extension of the DPO for describing platform business model choices. The DPO describes the digital platform domain in terms of digital platform types, including sharing platforms. However, a method to use the DPO and its business model extension for developing an organization-specific ontology that describes the functionality and business model of a specific existing or intended sharing platform was lacking. In this paper, we develop such a method using the Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) and demonstrate it using a proof-of-concept based on the BlaBlaCar and Couchsurfing platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Derave & Tiago Princes Sales & Frederik Gailly & Geert Poels, 2022. "Sharing Platform Ontology Development: Proof-of-Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2076-:d:747357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2076/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2076/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Täuscher, Karl & Laudien, Sven M., 2018. "Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 319-329.
    2. Lapo Filistrucchi & Damien Geradin & Eric van Damme & Pauline Affeldt, 2014. "Market Definition In Two-Sided Markets: Theory And Practice," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 293-339.
    3. Sutherland, Will & Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2018. "The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 328-341.
    4. Zhifu Mi & D’Maris Coffman, 2019. "The sharing economy promotes sustainable societies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-3, December.
    5. Friedrich Chasin & Moritz Hoffen & Marcus Cramer & Martin Matzner, 2018. "Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: a taxonomy and a reproducible analysis," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 293-325, May.
    6. Steven Kane Curtis & Matthias Lehner, 2019. "Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Aurélien Acquier & Valentina Carbone & David Massé, 2019. "How to Create Value(s) in the Sharing Economy: Business Models, Scalability, and Sustainability," Post-Print hal-02104568, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Woo, Hongjoo & Shin, Daeun Chloe & Kim, Naeun Lauren & Tong, Zhenghao & Kwon, Soyon, 2024. "Can sharing with others whom consumers Can't see increase their sense of community? An examination of social presence on sharing platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Yanwen Ruan & Yingjiao Xu & Hanna Lee, 2022. "Consumer Motivations for Luxury Fashion Rental: A Second-Order Factor Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carson Duan, 2023. "A State-of-the-Art Review of Sharing Economy Business Models and a Forecast of Future Research Directions for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-37, March.
    2. Ilse Hellemans & Amanda J. Porter & Damla Diriker, 2022. "Harnessing digitalization for sustainable development: Understanding how interactions on sustainability‐oriented digital platforms manage tensions and paradoxes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 668-683, February.
    3. Igor M. Stepnov & Yulia A. Kovalchuk, 2020. "Measuring value created by business models in the sharing economy," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(5), pages 58-69, November.
    4. Dalia Perkumienė & Milita Vienažindienė & Biruta Švagždienė, 2021. "The Sharing Economy towards Sustainable Tourism: An Example of an Online Transport-sharing Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Kateryna Molchanova, 2021. "Organization of Aviation Enterprises’ Interaction Based on the Digital Platform," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 4(1), pages 77-97, January.
    6. Anna Claudelin & Kaisa Tuominen & Susanna Vanhamäki, 2022. "Sustainability Perspectives of the Sharing Economy: Process of Creating a Library of Things in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Xufeng Liu & Hongmin Chen, 2020. "Sharing Economy: Promote Its Potential to Sustainability by Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Cossey, Jozef & Dedeurwaerdere, Tom & Périlleux, Anaïs, 2023. "Inherently unstable? Scaling, mission drift, and the comparative performance of community-based platforms in the sharing economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Vilma Karobliene & Vaida Pilinkiene, 2021. "The Sharing Economy in the Framework of Sustainable Development Goals: Case of European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-26, July.
    10. Shirazi, Masoud, 2022. "Assessing energy trilemma-related policies: The world's large energy user evidence," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Khodayari, Maryam & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Shahabaldini parizi, Zahra & Shahriari, Elmira, 2022. "Sharing Your Assets: A Holistic Review of Sharing Economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 604-625.
    12. Olga Lingaitienė & Virginija Grybaitė & Aurelija Burinskienė, 2022. "Core Elements Affecting Sharing Evidence from the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Rong, Ke & Li, Boyi & Peng, Wan & Zhou, Di & Shi, Xinwei, 2021. "Sharing economy platforms: creating shared value at a business ecosystem level," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Alexander Gleiss & Marco Kohlhagen & Key Pousttchi, 2021. "An apple a day – how the platform economy impacts value creation in the healthcare market," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 849-876, December.
    15. Chandna, Vallari, 2022. "Social entrepreneurship and digital platforms: Crowdfunding in the sharing-economy era," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 21-31.
    16. Nancy Bocken & Alexandra Jonca & Karolina Södergren & Jenny Palm, 2020. "Emergence of Carsharing Business Models and Sustainability Impacts in Swedish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Suciu Marta Christina & Nasulea Diana-Florentina & Nasulea Christian, 2020. "Smart City Innovation within the Sharing Economy: Urban Innovation and Collaborative Consumption," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 1147-1157, July.
    18. Andreas Reuschl & Victor Tiberius & Matthias Filser & Yixin Qiu, 2022. "Value configurations in sharing economy business models," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 89-112, January.
    19. V. I. Blanutsa, 2022. "Geographic Research of the Platform Economy: Existing and Potential Approaches," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 133-142, June.
    20. Tim Gruchmann & Nadine Pratt & Jan Eiten & Ani Melkonyan, 2020. "4PL Digital Business Models in Sea Freight Logistics: The Case of FreightHub," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2076-:d:747357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.