IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v171y2022i3d10.1007_s10584-022-03342-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the impact of sea level rise on maximum water elevation during storm surge events: a closer look at coastal embayments

Author

Listed:
  • Soroush Kouhi

    (University of Rhode Island)

  • M. Reza Hashemi

    (University of Rhode Island)

  • Malcolm Spaulding

    (University of Rhode Island)

  • Tetsu Hara

    (University of Rhode Island)

Abstract

Storm-surge models are commonly used to assess the impacts of hurricanes and coastal storms in coastal areas. Including the impact of the projected future sea level rise (SLR) in these models is a necessary step for a realistic flood risk assessment. Commonly, SLR is superimposed linearly on the simulated water elevation. This approach, while efficient, may lead to inaccuracies. Furthermore, developing a new model with updated data (e.g., boundary conditions, bathymetry) that include the effects of SLR (i.e., nonlinear approach) is time consuming. We compare the linear and nonlinear approaches to include the effect of SLR in predicting maximum water/flood elevations (MWE) as a result of storm surge. After a simplified theoretical analysis, a number of idealized cases based on the typical coastal bodies of water are modeled to assess the impact of SLR on MWE using the linear superposition and nonlinear approaches. Additionally, two case studies are carried out: Narragansett Bay, RI, and Long Island Sound, CT (USA). Results show that for the idealized cases with variable depth, in general, the linear superposition of SLR to MWE is conservative (i.e., predicts a larger flood elevation) relative to the nonlinear approach. However, if a constant depth is considered, results are not consistent (i.e., linear superposition can overestimate or underestimate MWE, and the results depended on the geometry). The simulated MWE from the Narragansett Bay simulation confirms the outcome of idealized cases showing that linear assumption is conservative up to 10% relative to the nonlinear approach. For this study, Hurricane Sandy and a synthetic storm from the US Army Corps of Engineers North Atlantic Comprehensive Coastal Study (NACCS) dataset are simulated. Long Island Sound model results are also consistent with the idealized case. In general, based on the results of the idealized and real case studies, a discrepancy of up to 10% between the linear and nonlinear approaches is expected in estimation of MWE which can be under- or over-estimation of flood elevation, depending on the geometry.

Suggested Citation

  • Soroush Kouhi & M. Reza Hashemi & Malcolm Spaulding & Tetsu Hara, 2022. "Modeling the impact of sea level rise on maximum water elevation during storm surge events: a closer look at coastal embayments," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:171:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-022-03342-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-022-03342-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-022-03342-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-022-03342-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jochen Hinkel & Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts & Sally Brown & Jose A. Jiménez & Daniel Lincke & Robert J. Nicholls & Paolo Scussolini & Agustín Sanchez-Arcilla & Athanasios Vafeidis & Kwasi Appeaning Addo, 2018. "The ability of societies to adapt to twenty-first-century sea-level rise," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 570-578, July.
    2. Siyuan Xian & Ning Lin & Adam Hatzikyriakou, 2015. "Storm surge damage to residential areas: a quantitative analysis for Hurricane Sandy in comparison with FEMA flood map," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1867-1888, December.
    3. D. Dissanayake & R. Ranasinghe & J. Roelvink, 2012. "The morphological response of large tidal inlet/basin systems to relative sea level rise," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 253-276, July.
    4. Kresning, Boma & Hashemi, M. Reza & Neill, Simon P. & Green, J. A. Mattias & Xue, Huijie, 2019. "The impacts of tidal energy development and sea-level rise in the Gulf of Maine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Annette Grilli & Malcolm L. Spaulding & Bryan A. Oakley & Chris Damon, 2017. "Mapping the coastal risk for the next century, including sea level rise and changes in the coastline: application to Charlestown RI, USA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 389-414, August.
    6. Jasper R. F. W. Leuven & Harm Jan Pierik & Maarten van der Vegt & Tjeerd J. Bouma & Maarten G. Kleinhans, 2019. "Sea-level-rise-induced threats depend on the size of tide-influenced estuaries worldwide," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(12), pages 986-992, December.
    7. Judith Wolf, 2009. "Coastal flooding: impacts of coupled wave–surge–tide models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 49(2), pages 241-260, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khojasteh, Danial & Lewis, Matthew & Tavakoli, Sasan & Farzadkhoo, Maryam & Felder, Stefan & Iglesias, Gregorio & Glamore, William, 2022. "Sea level rise will change estuarine tidal energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Mariamawit Borga & Burak F. Tanyu & Celso M. Ferreira & Juan L. Garzon & Michael Onufrychuk, 2017. "A geospatial framework to estimate depth of scour under buildings due to storm surge in coastal areas," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1285-1311, July.
    3. Box-Couillard, Sebastien & Xu, Yilan, 2022. "The Effect of Flood Insurance on Property Values after a Flood," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322191, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Brandon W. Kerns & Shuyi S. Chen, 2023. "Compound effects of rain, storm surge, and river discharge on coastal flooding during Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee (2011) in the Mid-Atlantic region: coupled atmosphere-wave-ocean model simu," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 693-726, March.
    5. Stéphan T. Grilli & Maryam Mohammadpour & Lauren Schambach & Annette R. Grilli, 2022. "Tsunami coastal hazard along the US East Coast from coseismic sources in the Açores convergence zone and the Caribbean arc areas," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1431-1478, March.
    6. Geronimo Gussmann & Jochen Hinkel, 2020. "What drives relocation policies in the Maldives?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 931-951, November.
    7. Kevin C. Hanegan & Duncan M. FitzGerald & Ioannis Y. Georgiou & Zoe J. Hughes, 2023. "Long-term sea level rise modeling of a basin-tidal inlet system reveals sediment sinks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Antoine Mandel & Timothy Tiggeloven & Daniel Lincke & Elco Koks & Philip Ward & Jochen Hinkel, 2021. "Risks on global financial stability induced by climate change: the case of flood risks," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Hasan, Md. Bokhtiar & Ali, Md. Sumon & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Mahi, Masnun Al & Liu, Yang & Park, Donghyun, 2022. "Is Bangladesh on the right path toward sustainable development? An empirical exploration of energy sources, economic growth, and CO2 discharges nexus," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Kaihang Zhou & Scott Hawken, 2023. "Climate-Related Sea Level Rise and Coastal Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure Futures: Landscape Planning Scenarios for Negotiating Risks and Opportunities in Australian Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Adam Hatzikyriakou & Ning Lin, 2017. "Simulating storm surge waves for structural vulnerability estimation and flood hazard mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(2), pages 939-962, November.
    12. Burić, Melita & Grgurić, Sanja & Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Wang, Xuebin, 2021. "A numerical investigation of tidal current energy resource potential in a sea strait," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    13. Alexander Bisaro & Mark Bel & Jochen Hinkel & Sien Kok & Laurens M. Bouwer, 2020. "Leveraging public adaptation finance through urban land reclamation: cases from Germany, the Netherlands and the Maldives," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 671-689, June.
    14. Paul Kirshen & Mark Borrelli & Jarrett Byrnes & Robert Chen & Lucy Lockwood & Chris Watson & Kimberly Starbuck & Jack Wiggin & Allison Novelly & Kristin Uiterwyk & Kelli Thurson & Brett McMann & Carly, 2020. "Integrated assessment of storm surge barrier systems under present and future climates and comparison to alternatives: a case study of Boston, USA," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 445-464, September.
    15. Wen-Cheng Liu & Wei-Che Huang, 2021. "Tide–surge and wave interaction around the Taiwan coast: insight from Typhoon Nepartak in 2016," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(2), pages 1881-1904, June.
    16. Deb, Mithun & Yang, Zhaoqing & Haas, Kevin & Wang, Taiping, 2024. "Hydrokinetic tidal energy resource assessment following international electrotechnical commission guidelines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    17. Yang, Zhixue & Ren, Zhouyang & Li, Hui & Pan, Zhen & Xia, Weiyi, 2024. "A review of tidal current power generation farm planning: Methodologies, characteristics and challenges," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    18. Xinmeng Shan & Jie Yin & Jun Wang, 2022. "Risk assessment of shanghai extreme flooding under the land use change scenario," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 1039-1060, January.
    19. Hashemi, M.Reza & Kresning, Boma & Hashemi, Javad & Ginis, Isaac, 2021. "Assessment of hurricane generated loads on offshore wind farms; a closer look at most extreme historical hurricanes in New England," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 593-609.
    20. Kok, Sien & Bisaro, Alexander & de Bel, Mark & Hinkel, Jochen & Bouwer, Laurens M., 2021. "The potential of nature-based flood defences to leverage public investment in coastal adaptation: Cases from the Netherlands, Indonesia and Georgia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:171:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-022-03342-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.