IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v38y2024i2p358-376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards ‘Racialising’ the Union Agenda on the Front Lines of Healthcare Professions

Author

Listed:
  • Gill Kirton

    (Queen Mary University of London, UK)

  • Cécile Guillaume

    (University of Surrey, UK)

Abstract

A persistent problem in trade unions is the discrepancy/tension that exists between their progressive national equality-seeking agenda and the translation of equality principles into workplace activism and their application to members’ everyday working lives. Building on the notion of ‘feminising’ the union agenda, this article explores professional unions’ efforts towards ‘racialising’ the agenda, which is a neglected equality focus in extant literature. The study is located within nursing and midwifery in NHS workplaces where the existence of racism has long been recognised by all employment relations actors. It investigates how the national union anti-racism project is implemented by workplace union representatives. While it reveals recognition of the existence of workplace racism among union representatives, a degree of denial and discomfort also exists. This, combined with the absence of the empowering union strategies that might be expected, hinders the delivery of a racially inclusive union agenda on the front lines of healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Gill Kirton & Cécile Guillaume, 2024. "Towards ‘Racialising’ the Union Agenda on the Front Lines of Healthcare Professions," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(2), pages 358-376, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:2:p:358-376
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170221135260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170221135260
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170221135260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tamara L. Lee & Maite Tapia, 2021. "Confronting Race and Other Social Identity Erasures: The Case for Critical Industrial Relations Theory," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(3), pages 637-662, May.
    2. Gill Kirton, 2015. "Progress Towards Gender Democracy in UK Unions 1987–2012," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 484-507, September.
    3. Linda Briskin, 2008. "Cross‐constituency Organizing in Canadian Unions," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 221-247, June.
    4. Adriana Bernardotti & Sukhwant Dhaliwal & Fabio Perocco, 2007. "Confronting racism in the health services," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 13(3), pages 413-430, August.
    5. Steve Jefferys, 2007. "Why do unions find fighting workplace racism difficult?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 13(3), pages 377-395, August.
    6. Roger Seifert & Wen Wang, 2018. "Race discrimination at work: the moderating role of trade unionism in English local government," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 259-277, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nouria Ouali & Steve Jefferys, 2015. "Hard times for trade union anti-racism workplace strategies," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 21(1), pages 99-113, February.
    2. John W. Budd & Dionne Pohler & Wei Huang, 2022. "Making sense of (mis)matched frames of reference: A dynamic cognitive theory of (in)stability in HR practices," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 268-289, July.
    3. Martin B. Carstensen & Christian Lyhne Ibsen & Vivien A. Schmidt, 2022. "Ideas and power in employment relations studies," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 3-21, January.
    4. Getinet Astatike Haile, 2021. "Men, women and unions," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 201-217, May.
    5. Maryam Dilmaghani, 2022. "The link between smoking, drinking and wages: Health, workplace social capital or discrimination?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 160-183, March.
    6. Julie Prowse & Peter Prowse & Robert Perrett, 2022. "‘Women take care and men take charge’: The case of leadership and gender in the Public and Commercial Services Union," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 773-792, May.
    7. Mark Dean & Robert Perrett, 2020. "Overcoming barriers to women's workplace leadership: insights from the interaction of formal and informal support mechanisms in trade unions," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 169-184, May.
    8. Tamara L. Lee & Maite Tapia, 2023. "Intersectional organizing: Building solidarity through radical confrontation," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 78-111, January.
    9. Antonio Martín Artiles & Oscar Molina, 2011. "Crisis, economic uncertainty and union members' attitudes towards immigration in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(4), pages 453-469, November.
    10. Cécile Guillaume, 2018. "Women's Participation in a Radical Trade Union Movement That Claims to be Feminist," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 556-578, September.
    11. Tony Dobbins & Stewart Johnstone & Marta Kahancová & J. Ryan Lamare & Adrian Wilkinson, 2023. "Comparative impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on work and employment—Why industrial relations institutions matter," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 115-125, April.
    12. Gregor Murray & Dalia Gesualdi-Fecteau & Christian Lévesque & Nicolas Roby, 2023. "What makes work better or worse? An analytical framework," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(3), pages 305-322, August.
    13. Simon Pek, 2019. "Rekindling Union Democracy Through the Use of Sortition," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 1033-1051, April.
    14. Steve Jefferys, 2015. "The context to challenging discrimination against ethnic minorities and migrant workers at work," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 21(1), pages 9-22, February.
    15. Rossana Cillo & Fabio Perocco, 2015. "Outsourced racism in Italy," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 21(1), pages 51-63, February.
    16. Virginia Doellgast & Matthew Bidwell & Alexander J. S. Colvin, 2021. "New Directions in Employment Relations Theory: Understanding Fragmentation, Identity, and Legitimacy," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(3), pages 555-579, May.
    17. Mihajla Gavin & Susan McGrath-Champ & Meghan Stacey & Rachel Wilson, 2022. "Women’s participation in teacher unions: Implications of a ‘triple burden’ for union gender equality strategies," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 830-852, May.
    18. Raquel Rego & Ana Espírito-Santo, 2023. "Beyond density: Improving European trade unions’ representativeness through gender quotas," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(4), pages 415-433, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:2:p:358-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.