IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1341-d210769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an Issue-Situation-Based Board Game: A Systemic Learning Environment for Water Resource Adaptation Education

Author

Listed:
  • Ping-Han Cheng

    (Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan)

  • Ting-Kuang Yeh

    (Department of Earth Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
    Institute of Marine Environmental Science and Technology, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan)

  • Jen-Che Tsai

    (Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan)

  • Ching-Rong Lin

    (Department of Tourism, Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan)

  • Chun-Yen Chang

    (Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
    Department of Earth Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
    Science Education Center, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan)

Abstract

Climate change has severely affected water resources (WRs) today, highlighting the importance of promoting education on WR adaptation (WRA). The goal of WRA education is to cultivate learners’ cross-oriented system knowledge (COSK), responsibility for WR environment (RWRE), value of public benefits (VPB), and empathy and negotiating thinking (EaNT). This study developed an issue-situation-based board game, namely Water Ark, to enhance participants’ WR knowledge. In this study, participants were divided into four groups with each playing the role of a WR-related organization: the government, agricultural sector, industrial sector and public guild. Scales and interviews were used to assess participants’ performance. The findings revealed that during the game, participants gradually changed from profit-oriented self-interest strategies to altruistic strategies based on social public benefit. Furthermore, after playing Water Ark, participants’ COSK, RWRE, VPB, and EaNT were found to have improved substantially. Thus, Water Ark is believed to be a useful tool for assisting WRA education.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping-Han Cheng & Ting-Kuang Yeh & Jen-Che Tsai & Ching-Rong Lin & Chun-Yen Chang, 2019. "Development of an Issue-Situation-Based Board Game: A Systemic Learning Environment for Water Resource Adaptation Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1341-:d:210769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi-Te Chiang & Wei-Ta Fang & Ulas Kaplan & Eric Ng, 2019. "Locus of Control: The Mediation Effect between Emotional Stability and Pro-Environmental Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Di Paolo & Veronica Pizziol, 2024. "Gamification and Sustainable Water Use: The Case of the BLUTUBE Educational Program," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 55(3), pages 391-417, June.
    2. Jen-Che Tsai & Shiang-Yao Liu & Chun-Yen Chang & Shih-Yeh Chen, 2021. "Using a Board Game to Teach about Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Teen-Hang Meen & Charles Tijus & Jui-Che Tu, 2019. "Selected Papers from the Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Kristoffer S. Fjællingsdal & Christian A. Klöckner, 2020. "Green Across the Board: Board Games as Tools for Dialogue and Simplified Environmental Communication," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(5), pages 632-652, October.
    5. Rebecca Yvonne Bayeck, 2020. "Examining Board Gameplay and Learning: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Research," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(4), pages 411-431, August.
    6. María Elena Orduña Alegría & Niels Schütze & Samuel C. Zipper, 2020. "A Serious Board Game to Analyze Socio-Ecological Dynamics towards Collaboration in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Ping-Han Cheng & Ting-Kuang Yeh & Yen-Kai Chao & Jing Lin & Chun-Yen Chang, 2020. "Design Ideas for an Issue-Situation-Based Board Game Involving Multirole Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ankica Kosic & Paola Passafaro & Martina Molinari, 2024. "Predicting Pro-Environmental Behaviours in the Public Sphere: Comparing the Influence of Social Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, Global Warming Awareness and the NEP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Mircea Cătălin Dîrțu & Oara Prundeanu, 2023. "Narcissism and Pro-Environmental Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Self-Monitoring, Environmental Control and Attitudes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Qian-Cheng Wang & Yi-Xuan Wang & Izzy Yi Jian & Hsi-Hsien Wei & Xuan Liu & Yao-Tian Ma, 2020. "Exploring the “Energy-Saving Personality Traits” in the Office and Household Situation: An Empirical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Pagnarith Srun & Kiyo Kurisu, 2019. "Internal and External Influential Factors on Waste Disposal Behavior in Public Open Spaces in Phnom Penh, Cambodia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Abida Begum & Liu Jingwei & Maqsood Haider & Muhammad Maroof Ajmal & Salim Khan & Heesup Han, 2021. "Impact of Environmental Moral Education on Pro-Environmental Behaviour: Do Psychological Empowerment and Islamic Religiosity Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Chunkui Zhu & Peishan Tong & Zhiping Song, 2021. "A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Environmental Behavior Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Daniela Nicoleta BOTONE, 2019. "The Emotional Work And Locus Of Control In The Case Of Romanian Nurses," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 21, pages 237-242, December.
    8. Abida Begum & Liu Jingwei & Imran Ullah Khan Marwat & Salim Khan & Heesup Han & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Evaluating the Impact of Environmental Education on Ecologically Friendly Behavior of University Students in Pakistan: The Roles of Environmental Responsibility and Islamic Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Toti, Jean-François & Diallo, Mbaye Fall & Huaman-Ramirez, Richard, 2021. "Ethical sensitivity in consumers’ decision-making: The mediating and moderating role of internal locus of control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 168-182.
    10. Ralph Hansmann & Claudia R. Binder, 2020. "Determinants of Different Types of Positive Environmental Behaviors: An Analysis of Public and Private Sphere Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1341-:d:210769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.