IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/manlab/v45y2020i4p444-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Inter-organizational Justice on Dimensions of Organizational Citizenship Behaviours: A Study on Kuwait Ministries’ Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Zayed
  • Junaimah Jauhar
  • Zurina Mohaidin
  • Mohsen Ali Murshid

Abstract

The aim of this article is to model the relationships between three different dimensions of inter-organizational justice (procedural, interactional and distributive) and their influence on five dimensions of organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) (altruism, sportsmanship, conscientiousness, courtesy and civic virtue) in public sector organizations. The partial least square (PLS) path method was used to explore the nature of the relationships. The survey was self-administered to 573 employees working in nine different government ministries in Kuwait, with a response rate of 373. The results indicate that employees’ perceptions of interactional justice positively influence their perceptions of procedural justice, distributive justice, altruism, civic virtue, conscientiousness, courtesy and sportsmanship. In addition, the results showed the perceived interactional justice of employees has an indirect effect on all dimensions of OCBs through their distributive justice perceptions. The results also revealed that interactional justice has only an indirect effect on altruism, sportsmanship, and courtesy through procedural fairness. Directors of public organizations should pay particular attention to offering a higher level of interactive justice that can strongly improve employee perception of distributive and procedural justice. This, in turn, may show high degrees of civic virtue, sportsmanship, altruism, courtesy, and conscience behavior among employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Zayed & Junaimah Jauhar & Zurina Mohaidin & Mohsen Ali Murshid, 2020. "Effects of Inter-organizational Justice on Dimensions of Organizational Citizenship Behaviours: A Study on Kuwait Ministries’ Employees," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 45(4), pages 444-470, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:manlab:v:45:y:2020:i:4:p:444-470
    DOI: 10.1177/0258042X20939026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0258042X20939026
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0258042X20939026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong Chul Shim & John Rohrbaugh, 2014. "An Explanation of Differences Between Government Offices in Employees' Organizational Citizenship Behaviour," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 807-829, September.
    2. Yu Ghee Wee & Kamarul Zaman Ahmad & Yap Sheau Fen, 2014. "Organisational Justice and its Role in Promoting Citizenship Behaviour among Hotel Employees in Malaysia," Institutions and Economies (formerly known as International Journal of Institutions and Economies), Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, vol. 6(2), pages 79-104, July.
    3. Kaynak, Ramazan & Sert, Tuba & Sert, Gurkan & Akyuz, Bulent, 2015. "Supply chain unethical behaviors and continuity of relationship: Using the PLS approach for testing moderation effects of inter-organizational justice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 83-91.
    4. Ibrahim Mohamed & Roland K. Yeo, 2014. "Impact of organisational justice on work outcomes in the pharmaceutical industry in Kuwait," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1/2/3), pages 17-46.
    5. Ali H. Muhammad, 2014. "Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Case of Kuwait," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(3), pages 59-72, May.
    6. Heba E. Helmy, 2013. "An approach to quantifying social justice in selected developing countries," International Journal of Development Issues, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(1), pages 67-84, April.
    7. Mohammad Alzayed & Junaimah Jauhar & Zurina Mohaidin, 2017. "The Mediating Effect of Affective Organizational Commitment in the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Conceptual Model," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(5), pages 165-165, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shariff Harun & Septi Fahmi Choirisa & Nosica Rizkalla, 2023. "Organizational Justice and Employee Retention: A Theoretical Framework for Malaysian and Indonesian Higher Learning Institutions," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(3), pages 280-288.
    2. Jia, Fang & Wei, Liyuan & Jiang, Ling & Hu, Zuohao & Yang, Zhilin, 2021. "Curbing opportunism in marketing channels: The roles of influence strategy and perceived fairness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 69-80.
    3. Zhang, Yanming & Huo, Baofeng & Haney, Mark H. & Kang, Mingu, 2022. "The effect of buyer digital capability advantage on supplier unethical behavior: A moderated mediation model of relationship transparency and relational capital," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    4. Noor Al-Ma'aitah, 2018. "The Role of Justice in Achieving Long-term Buyer-Supplier Relationship: The Case of Jordanian Manufacturing Sector," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(2), pages 109-117.
    5. Yu-Shan Chen & Chun-Ming Lien & Wei-Yuan Lo & Fuh-Shyong Tsay, 2021. "Sustainability of Positive Psychological Status in the Workplace: The Influence of Organizational Psychological Ownership and Psychological Capital on Police Officers’ Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Agnieszka Kopańska, 2022. "Local governments' revenue and expenditure autonomy as a determinant of local public spending on culture. An analysis for Polish rural municipalities," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 7, ejms_v7_i.
    7. Zhang, Mengdi & Shen, Qiao & Zhao, Zhiheng & Wang, Shuaian & Huang, George Q., 2024. "Commitment or rent-seeking? Government incentive policies for ESG reporting in sustainable e-commerce logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    8. Ayman Alshaabani & Farheen Naz & Róbert Magda & Ildikó Rudnák, 2021. "Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on OCB in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic in Hungary: Employee Engagement and Affective Commitment as Mediators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Nor Azima Ahmad & Siti Salwa Salim & Fariza Md Sham, 2021. "Is Perceived Organizational Support an Antecedent of Employee Behaviour?," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 351265-3512, December.
    10. Mohammad Alghababsheh & David Gallear & Mushfiqur Rahman, 2020. "Balancing the Scales of Justice: Do Perceptions of Buyers’ Justice Drive Suppliers’ Social Performance?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 125-150, April.
    11. Rushana Khusanova & Suk Bong Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2019. "Sustainable Workplace: The Moderating Role of Office Design on the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Son, Byung-Gak & Lee, Chang-Hun & Ha, Byoung-Chun & Nam, Hyunjeong, 2019. "Investigating the fair treatment of suppliers and its trust fostering role and performance benefits," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 54-66.
    13. Yeung, Kwong & Cheng, T.C.E. & Lee, Peter K.C., 2015. "Buyers’ perceptions on the impact of strategic purchasing on dyadic quality performances," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 321-330.
    14. Eaint Yadanar Oo & Heajung Jung & In-Jo Park, 2018. "Psychological Factors Linking Perceived CSR to OCB: The Role of Organizational Pride, Collectivism, and Person–Organization Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Adeshina Olushola Adeniyi, 2023. "The mediating effects of entrepreneurial self-efficacy in the relationship between entrepreneurship education and start-up readiness," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Moreno-Miranda, Carlos & Dries, Liesbeth, 2024. "Circular economy intentions in the fruit and vegetable sector of Central Ecuador," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    17. Huo, Baofeng & Wang, Zhiqiang & Tian, Yu, 2016. "The impact of justice on collaborative and opportunistic behaviors in supply chain relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 12-23.
    18. Colicev, Anatoli & De Giovanni, Pietro & Vinzi, Vincenzo Esposito, 2016. "An empirical investigation of the antecedents of partnering capability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 144-153.
    19. Ingunn Y. Gudbrandsdottir & Gudrun Olafsdottir & Gudmundur Valur Oddsson & Hlynur Stefansson & Sigurdur G. Bogason, 2021. "Operationalization of Interorganizational Fairness in Food Systems: From a Social Construct to Quantitative Indicators," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta & Zongwei Luo & Pratima Sheorey, 2022. "Enabling artificial intelligence on a donation-based crowdfunding platform: a theoretical approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 761-789, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:manlab:v:45:y:2020:i:4:p:444-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.xlri.ac.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.