IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7800-d593156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on OCB in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic in Hungary: Employee Engagement and Affective Commitment as Mediators

Author

Listed:
  • Ayman Alshaabani

    (Institute of Economics, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2100 Gödöllo, Hungary)

  • Farheen Naz

    (Institute of Economics, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2100 Gödöllo, Hungary)

  • Róbert Magda

    (Institute of Economics, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2100 Gödöllo, Hungary
    Vanderbijlpark Campus, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa)

  • Ildikó Rudnák

    (Institute of Economics, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2100 Gödöllo, Hungary)

Abstract

The performance of the employees and productivity of each individual, in general, have been badly affected because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Organizational citizenship behavior is regarded as an interpretation of the performance of the employee which is essential to contribute more to the organization’s processes and success. Therefore, to increase the organizational effectiveness and achieve its goals, it is crucial to understand the factors affecting the organizational citizenship behavior of the employees. This study aims to examine the impact of perceived organizational support on organizational citizenship behavior with the mediating role of employee engagement and affective commitment. To collect the data for this study, a linear snowball sampling method was used, and 380 foreign employees working in different service companies in Hungary participated in the survey. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the proposed hypothesis. The results of the study revealed that perceived organizational support positively associated with organizational citizenship behavior and this relationship is also strongly mediated by employee engagement. On the other hand, employee engagement and affective commitment pose a direct positive influence on organizational citizenship behavior. This study has theoretical and practical implications as it will provide a comprehensive framework to better understand the factors influencing the organizational citizenship behavior of the employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayman Alshaabani & Farheen Naz & Róbert Magda & Ildikó Rudnák, 2021. "Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on OCB in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic in Hungary: Employee Engagement and Affective Commitment as Mediators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7800-:d:593156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorothea Wahyu Ariani, 2013. "The Relationship between Employee Engagement, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Counterproductive Work Behavior," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(2), pages 46-56, March.
    2. Arafat Rahman & Peter Björk & Annika Ravald, 2020. "Exploring the effects of service provider’s organizational support and empowerment on employee engagement and well-being," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1767329-176, January.
    3. Wenmin Wu & Chien-Chiang Lee & Wenwu Xing & Shan-Ju Ho, 2021. "The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on Chinese-listed tourism stocks," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Grażyna Bartkowiak & Agnieszka Krugiełka & Ryszard Dachowski & Katarzyna Gałek & Paulina Kostrzewa-Demczuk, 2020. "Attitudes of Polish Entrepreneurs towards 65+ Knowledge Workers in the Context of Their Pro-Social Attitude and Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Rudolph, Cort W. & Allan, Blake & Clark, Malissa & Hertel, Guido & Hirschi, Andreas & Kunze, Florian & Shockley, Kristen & Shoss, Mindy & Sonnentag, Sabine & Zacher, Hannes, 2021. "Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1-2), pages 1-35, June.
    6. Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan & Tortorella, Guilherme, 2021. "Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on employee performance – Moderating role of industry 4.0 base technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Ayman Alshaabani & Farheen Naz & Ildikó Rudnák, 2021. "Impact of Green Human Resources Practices on Green Work Engagement in the Renewable Energy Departments," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(6), pages 1-44, June.
    8. Ali H. Muhammad, 2014. "Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Case of Kuwait," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(3), pages 59-72, May.
    9. Macey, William H. & Schneider, Benjamin, 2008. "The Meaning of Employee Engagement," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 3-30, March.
    10. Judit Oláh & Zuzana Hajduová & Roman Lacko & Pavol Andrejovský, 2020. "Quality of Life Regional Differences: Case of Self-Governing Regions of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    12. Amelia Manuti & Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Monica Molino & Emanuela Ingusci & Vincenzo Russo & Fulvio Signore & Margherita Zito & Claudio Giovanni Cortese, 2020. "“Everything Will Be Fine”: A Study on the Relationship between Employees’ Perception of Sustainable HRM Practices and Positive Organizational Behavior during COVID19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Dube, Kaitano & Nhamo, Godwell & Chikodzi, David, 2021. "COVID-19 pandemic and prospects for recovery of the global aviation industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Beili Li & Xu Fan & Susana Álvarez-Otero & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Ubaldo Comite & Jacob Cherian & László Vasa, 2021. "CSR and Workplace Autonomy as Enablers of Workplace Innovation in SMEs through Employees: Extending the Boundary Conditions of Self-Determination Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Zoltán Lakner & Anna Kiss & Ivan Merlet & Judit Oláh & Domicián Máté & Janusz Grabara & József Popp, 2018. "Building Coalitions for a Diversified and Sustainable Tourism: Two Case Studies from Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    16. James K. C. Chen & Thitima Sriphon, 2021. "Perspective on COVID-19 Pandemic Factors Impacting Organizational Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Henry Kaiser, 1974. "An index of factorial simplicity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(1), pages 31-36, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad Rizki Sridadi & Andika Setia Pratama & Anis Eliyana & Desynta Rahmawati Gunawan & Zaleha Yazid, 2024. "Fostering Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Proactive Personality, Job Satisfaction, and Affective Commitment," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    2. Yusuf Yılmaz & Engin Üngüren & Ömer Akgün Tekin & Yaşar Yiğit Kaçmaz, 2022. "Living with Infection Risk and Job Insecurity during COVID-19: The Relationship of Organizational Support, Organizational Commitment, and Turnover Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Shapan Chandra Majumder & Md. Hasanur Rahman & Nisat Akter Suci & Luckya Kabir, 2025. "Post Covid-19 economic and social impact on international migrant workers employment vulnerability: empirical evidence from Chittagong division, Bangladesh," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Helena Bulińska-Stangrecka & Anna Bagieńska, 2021. "Culture-Based Green Workplace Practices as a Means of Conserving Energy and Other Natural Resources in the Manufacturing Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Dolores Mensah Hervie & Ernest Amoako-Atta & Md Billal Hossain & Csaba Bálint Illés & Anna Dunay, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Hotel Employees in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Antonino Callea & Amelia Manuti, 2022. "“I Like It like That”: A Study on the Relationship between Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Extra-Role Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Tilahun Kidane Diko & Shabnam Saxena, 2023. "Antecedents and outcome of employee engagement: Empirical study of Ethiopian public higher education institutions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Hazrat Bilal & Naveed Farooq & Kauser Hayat, 2019. "Empirically Investigating the Impact of Employee Engagement on Counterproductive Work Behavior of Academic Staff," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 120-127, March.
    4. Rožman, Maja & Treven, Sonja & Čančer, Vesna, 2020. "The impact of promoting intergenerational synergy on the work engagement of older employees in Slovenia," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 25(1), pages 9-34.
    5. José M. Peiró & David Montesa & Aida Soriano & Malgorzata W. Kozusznik & Esther Villajos & Jorge Magdaleno & Nia Plamenova Djourova & Yarid Ayala, 2021. "Revisiting the Happy-Productive Worker Thesis from a Eudaimonic Perspective: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Sabina Baniya Chhetri, 2017. "Antecedents and Consequences of Job Engagement: Empirical Study of Bank Employees," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 5(2), pages 167-179, July.
    7. Soane, Emma & Truss, Catherine & Alfes, Kerstin & Shantz, Amanda & Rees, Chris & Gatenby, Mark, 2012. "Development and application of a new measure of employee engagement: the ISA engagement scale," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63486, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Iliyasu Shiyanbade Najeemdeen & Bello Taofik Abidemi & Farah Diana Rahmat & Bannah Daniel Bulus, 2018. "Perceived Organizational Culture and Perceived Organizational Support on Work Engagement," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 4(3), pages 199-208, September.
    9. Nasser Saad Al Kahtani & Sulphey M. M., 2022. "A Study on How Psychological Capital, Social Capital, Workplace Wellbeing, and Employee Engagement Relate to Task Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    10. Woocheol Kim & Gohar Feroz Khan & Jacob Wood & Muhammad Tariq Mahmood, 2016. "Employee Engagement for Sustainable Organizations: Keyword Analysis Using Social Network Analysis and Burst Detection Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
    11. Francoise Contreras & Juan C. Espinosa & Gustavo A. Esguerra, 2020. "Could Personal Resources Influence Work Engagement and Burnout? A Study in a Group of Nursing Staff," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    12. Nina Pološki Vokić & Tomislav Hernaus, 2015. "The triad of job satisfaction, work engagement and employee loyalty – The interplay among the concepts," EFZG Working Papers Series 1507, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.
    13. Urmila Rani Srivastava & Vandana Maurya, 2017. "Organizational and Individual Level Antecedents of Psychological Capital and its Associated Outcomes: Development of a Conceptual Framework," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 42(3), pages 205-236, August.
    14. Anya Johnson & Helena Nguyen & Markus Groth & Les White, 2018. "Workplace aggression and organisational effectiveness: The mediating role of employee engagement," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(4), pages 614-631, November.
    15. Widdy Muhammad Sabar Wibawa & Yoshi Takahashi, 2021. "The Effect of Ethical Leadership on Work Engagement and Workaholism: Examining Self-Efficacy as a Moderator," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Neha Gupta & Vandna Sharma, 2016. "Exploring Employee Engagement—A Way to Better Business Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(3_suppl), pages 45-63, June.
    17. Guohua He & Ran An & Feng Zhang, 2019. "Cultural Intelligence and Work–Family Conflict: A Moderated Mediation Model Based on Conservation of Resources Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Rawan Alafeshat & Cem Tanova, 2019. "Servant Leadership Style and High-Performance Work System Practices: Pathway to a Sustainable Jordanian Airline Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Ciprian Obrad, 2020. "Constraints and Consequences of Online Teaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Crosby, Lawrence A. & Ghanbarpour, Tohid, 2023. "The Drucker intangibles measurement system: An academic perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7800-:d:593156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.