IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v177y2016icp12-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of justice on collaborative and opportunistic behaviors in supply chain relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Huo, Baofeng
  • Wang, Zhiqiang
  • Tian, Yu

Abstract

Based on transaction cost economics and social exchange theory, this study investigates how supplier justice influences buyers' specific investments and communication, which in turn influence the opportunistic behavior of both parties in the supply chain. Data from 240 firms in China are used to test the proposed relationships, and the results suggest that supplier distributive and procedural justice can increase the buyer's specific investment. However, supplier interactional justice only improves the buyer's communication with the supplier. Moreover, supplier opportunism is curbed by buyer communication but increased by the buyer's specific investment. Buyer opportunism is restrained by buyer communication and supplier procedural justice. This study contributes to the literature by investigating the relationships between justice, collaboration, and opportunism in the upstream supply chain. The findings can help managers to maintain their supply chain relationships more effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Huo, Baofeng & Wang, Zhiqiang & Tian, Yu, 2016. "The impact of justice on collaborative and opportunistic behaviors in supply chain relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 12-23.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:177:y:2016:i:c:p:12-23
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527316300317
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min‐Ping Kang & Joseph T. Mahoney & Danchi Tan, 2009. "Why firms make unilateral investments specific to other firms: the case of OEM suppliers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 117-135, February.
    2. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Glenn Hoetker & Thomas Mellewigt, 2009. "Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: matching alliance governance to asset type," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(10), pages 1025-1044, October.
    4. Luo, Yadong, 2006. "Opportunism in Inter-firm Exchanges in Emerging Markets[1]," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 121-147, March.
    5. Cohen-Charash, Yochi & Spector, Paul E., 2001. "The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 278-321, November.
    6. Brown, James R. & Cobb, Anthony T. & Lusch, Robert F., 2006. "The roles played by interorganizational contracts and justice in marketing channel relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 166-175, February.
    7. Yadong Luo, 2008. "Procedural fairness and interfirm cooperation in strategic alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 27-46, January.
    8. Bryan W. Husted & Robert Folger, 2004. "Fairness and Transaction Costs: The Contribution of Organizational Justice Theory to an Integrative Model of Economic Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(6), pages 719-729, December.
    9. Yadong Luo, 2007. "An integrated anti-opportunism system in international exchange," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 38(6), pages 855-877, November.
    10. Kaynak, Ramazan & Sert, Tuba & Sert, Gurkan & Akyuz, Bulent, 2015. "Supply chain unethical behaviors and continuity of relationship: Using the PLS approach for testing moderation effects of inter-organizational justice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 83-91.
    11. Anoop Madhok & Stephen B. Tallman, 1998. "Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 326-339, June.
    12. Yadong Luo, 2006. "Opportunism in Inter-firm Exchanges in Emerging Markets," Management and Organization Review, International Association of Chinese Management Research, vol. 2(1), pages 121-147, March.
    13. Bhattacharya, Ananya & Singh, Prakash J. & Nand, Alka Ashwini, 2015. "Antecedents of buyer opportunistic behavior in outsourcing relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 258-268.
    14. William G. Ouchi, 1979. "A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(9), pages 833-848, September.
    15. Sambasivan, Murali & Siew-Phaik, Loke & Abidin Mohamed, Zainal & Choy Leong, Yee, 2013. "Factors influencing strategic alliance outcomes in a manufacturing supply chain: Role of alliance motives, interdependence, asset specificity and relational capital," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 339-351.
    16. Vincenzo Perrone & Akbar Zaheer & Bill McEvily, 2003. "Free to Be Trusted? Organizational Constraints on Trust in Boundary Spanners," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 422-439, August.
    17. Yilmaz, Cengiz & Sezen, Bulent & Kabadayi, Ebru Tumer, 2004. "Supplier fairness as a mediating factor in the supplier performance-reseller satisfaction relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(8), pages 854-863, August.
    18. Masaaki Kotabe & Xavier Martin & Hiroshi Domoto, 2003. "Gaining from vertical partnerships: knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 293-316, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lina Mao & Jinghua Li & Changwei Guo, 2019. "Integrator’s Coordination on Technological Innovation Performance in China: The Dual Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Jia, Fang & Wei, Liyuan & Jiang, Ling & Hu, Zuohao & Yang, Zhilin, 2021. "Curbing opportunism in marketing channels: The roles of influence strategy and perceived fairness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 69-80.
    3. Gu, Jing & Shi, Xinyu & Wang, Junyao & Xu, Xun, 2024. "Examining the impact of market power discrepancy between supply chain partners on firm financial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    4. Ingunn Y. Gudbrandsdottir & Gudrun Olafsdottir & Gudmundur Valur Oddsson & Hlynur Stefansson & Sigurdur G. Bogason, 2021. "Operationalization of Interorganizational Fairness in Food Systems: From a Social Construct to Quantitative Indicators," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Thomas Mellewigt & Glenn Hoetker & Martina Lütkewitte, 2018. "Avoiding High Opportunism Is Easy, Achieving Low Opportunism Is Not: A QCA Study on Curbing Opportunism in Buyer–Supplier Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1208-1208, December.
    6. Jianqi Qiao & Suicheng Li & Antonio Capaldo, 2022. "Green supply chain management, supplier environmental commitment, and the roles of supplier perceived relationship attractiveness and justice. A moderated moderation analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3523-3541, November.
    7. Wang, Kedi & Huo, Baofeng & Tian, Min, 2021. "How to protect specific investments from opportunism: A moderated mediation model of customer integration and transformational leadership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    8. Jianbo Zhu & Miao Fang & Qianqian Shi & Peng Wang & Qian Li, 2018. "Contractor Cooperation Mechanism and Evolution of the Green Supply Chain in Mega Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Yang Liu & Peng Cheng & Li Hu, 2022. "How do justice and top management beliefs matter in industrial symbiosis collaboration: An exploratory study from China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 891-906, June.
    10. Mohammad Alghababsheh & David Gallear & Mushfiqur Rahman, 2020. "Balancing the Scales of Justice: Do Perceptions of Buyers’ Justice Drive Suppliers’ Social Performance?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 125-150, April.
    11. Shaoling Fu & Hua Liu & Kim Hua Tan & Yuanzhu Zhan & Yalan Ding & Wene Qi, 2018. "How Social Capital Affects the Quality Performance of Agricultural Products: Evidence from a Binary Perspective of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Tran, Phuong Nguyen Thu & Gorton, Matthew & Lemke, Fred, 2021. "When supplier development initiatives fail: Identifying the causes of opportunism and unexpected outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 277-289.
    13. Sang M. Lee & Donghyun Choi, 2021. "Supply Chain Governance Mechanisms, Green Supply Chain Management, and Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Xuesong Zhao & Jieyi Pan & Yongtao Song, 2018. "Dependence on Supplier, Supplier Trust and Green Supplier Integration: The Moderating Role of Contract Management Difficulty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Wu, Ing-Long & Chiu, Mai-Lun, 2018. "Examining supply chain collaboration with determinants and performance impact: Social capital, justice, and technology use perspectives," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 5-19.
    16. Tomás F. Espino-Rodríguez & Juan Carlos Ramírez-Fierro, 2019. "Dimensions of behavior and proactive improvement in hotel outsourcing relationships: the role of justice," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(3), pages 479-508, September.
    17. Huo, Baofeng & Ye, Yuxiao & Zhao, Xiande & Wei, Jiang & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2018. "Environmental uncertainty, specific assets, and opportunism in 3PL relationships: A transaction cost economics perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 154-163.
    18. Mikami, Kentaro & Ikegami, Jusuke “JJ” & Bird, Allan, 2022. "Opportunism and trust in cross- national lateral collaboration: the Renault-Nissan Alliance and a theory of equity-trust," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    19. Hemmert, Martin & Kim, DaeSoo & Kim, Jisun & Cho, BooYun, 2016. "Building the supplier's trust: Role of institutional forces and buyer firm practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 25-37.
    20. Noor Al-Ma'aitah, 2018. "The Role of Justice in Achieving Long-term Buyer-Supplier Relationship: The Case of Jordanian Manufacturing Sector," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(2), pages 109-117.
    21. Haoyang Song & Jianhua Hou & Shiqi Tang, 2021. "From Contractual Flexibility to Contractor’s Cooperative Behavior in Construction Projects: The Multiple Mediation Effects of Ongoing Trust and Justice Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Alghababsheh & David Gallear & Mushfiqur Rahman, 2020. "Balancing the Scales of Justice: Do Perceptions of Buyers’ Justice Drive Suppliers’ Social Performance?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 125-150, April.
    2. Wang, Lei & Zhang, Chun & Jiang, Fuming, 2019. "Matching governance mechanisms with transaction-specific investment types and supplier roles: An empirical study of cross-border outsourcing relationships," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 316-327.
    3. Luo, Yadong & Liu, Yi & Yang, Qian & Maksimov, Vladislav & Hou, Jigang, 2015. "Improving performance and reducing cost in buyer–supplier relationships: The role of justice in curtailing opportunism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 607-615.
    4. Huo, Baofeng & Fu, Dijia & Zhao, Xiande & Zhu, Jingwen, 2016. "Curbing opportunism in logistics outsourcing relationships: The role of relational norms and contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 293-303.
    5. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou, 2014. "Managing contracts for fairness in buyer–supplier exchanges," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(10), pages 1508-1527, October.
    6. Ali, Tahir & Larimo, Jorma, 2016. "Managing opportunism in international joint ventures: The role of structural and social mechanisms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 86-96.
    7. Huo, Baofeng & Ye, Yuxiao & Zhao, Xiande, 2015. "The impacts of trust and contracts on opportunism in the 3PL industry: The moderating role of demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 160-170.
    8. Huo, Baofeng & Ye, Yuxiao & Zhao, Xiande & Wei, Jiang & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2018. "Environmental uncertainty, specific assets, and opportunism in 3PL relationships: A transaction cost economics perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 154-163.
    9. Jia, Fang & Wei, Liyuan & Jiang, Ling & Hu, Zuohao & Yang, Zhilin, 2021. "Curbing opportunism in marketing channels: The roles of influence strategy and perceived fairness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 69-80.
    10. Kaynak, Ramazan & Sert, Tuba & Sert, Gurkan & Akyuz, Bulent, 2015. "Supply chain unethical behaviors and continuity of relationship: Using the PLS approach for testing moderation effects of inter-organizational justice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 83-91.
    11. Yeung, Kwong & Cheng, T.C.E. & Lee, Peter K.C., 2015. "Buyers’ perceptions on the impact of strategic purchasing on dyadic quality performances," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 321-330.
    12. Jochen Schweitzer, 2016. "How Contracts And Culture Mediate Joint Transactions Of Innovation Partnerships," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-33, January.
    13. Shaobo Wei & Weiling Ke & Augustine A. Lado & Hefu Liu & Kwok Kee Wei, 2020. "The Effects of Justice and Top Management Beliefs and Participation: An Exploratory Study in the Context of Digital Supply Chain Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 51-71, September.
    14. Van Wijk, Raymond & Nadolska, Anna, 2020. "Making more of alliance portfolios: The role of alliance portfolio coordination," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 388-399.
    15. Choi, Young Rok & Phan, Phillip H. & Choi, Jaepil, 2020. "Formal governance, interfirm coordination, and performance in partnerships: An empirical investigation of a mediation model," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 413-424.
    16. Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Debrah, Yaw & Nuertey, Dorcas, 2018. "Institutional Legitimacy, Cross-Border Trade and Institutional Voids: Insights from the Cocoa Industry in Ghana," MPRA Paper 84393, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Alex Eapen & Rekha Krishnan, 2019. "Transferring Tacit Know-How: Do Opportunism Safeguards Matter for Firm Boundary Decisions?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 715-734, July.
    18. Roden, Sinéad & Lawson, Benn, 2014. "Developing social capital in buyer–supplier relationships: The contingent effect of relationship-specific adaptations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 89-99.
    19. Lumineau, Fabrice & Henderson, James, 2012. "The influence of relational experience and contractual governance on the negotiation strategy in buyer-supplier disputes," MPRA Paper 38510, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Kashyap, Vishal & Sivadas, Eugene, 2012. "An exploratory examination of shared values in channel relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 586-593.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:177:y:2016:i:c:p:12-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.