IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v77y2024i4p506-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Control and Flexibility: The Use of Wearable Devices in Capital- and Labor-Intensive Work Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Krzywdzinski
  • Maren Evers
  • Christine Gerber

Abstract

The use of wearables in the workplace allows for close monitoring of work processes and might also have consequences for work content and skill requirements. Past research has emphasized the detrimental effects of wearables, particularly those caused by the standardization of work and monitoring of workers. By contrast, this study asks under what conditions the implementation of wearables as part of digital assistance systems is beneficial for workers. Based on recent contributions in the field of labor process theory, this study analyzes the implementation of new technologies using the concepts of the regulatory regime, organizational first-order factors , and workplace second-order choices . The analysis is based on findings from 48 interviews with 83 interviewees in 16 German manufacturing workplaces along with making site visits. It examines the implementation of wearables and the impacts on work content, skills, working conditions, and employment. Besides showing how labor agency affects the implementation of new technologies, the particular contribution of this study lies in analyzing the differences in the implementation of wearables in capital- and labor-intensive organizations. While standardization of work and reduction of work content prevailed in labor-intensive processes, capital-intensive processes were most often characterized by the extension of skill requirements and the risk of work intensification.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Krzywdzinski & Maren Evers & Christine Gerber, 2024. "Control and Flexibility: The Use of Wearable Devices in Capital- and Labor-Intensive Work Processes," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(4), pages 506-534, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:77:y:2024:i:4:p:506-534
    DOI: 10.1177/00197939241258206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00197939241258206
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00197939241258206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:77:y:2024:i:4:p:506-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.