IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0146500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model-Free Estimation of Tuning Curves and Their Attentional Modulation, Based on Sparse and Noisy Data

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Helmer
  • Vladislav Kozyrev
  • Valeska Stephan
  • Stefan Treue
  • Theo Geisel
  • Demian Battaglia

Abstract

Tuning curves are the functions that relate the responses of sensory neurons to various values within one continuous stimulus dimension (such as the orientation of a bar in the visual domain or the frequency of a tone in the auditory domain). They are commonly determined by fitting a model e.g. a Gaussian or other bell-shaped curves to the measured responses to a small subset of discrete stimuli in the relevant dimension. However, as neuronal responses are irregular and experimental measurements noisy, it is often difficult to determine reliably the appropriate model from the data. We illustrate this general problem by fitting diverse models to representative recordings from area MT in rhesus monkey visual cortex during multiple attentional tasks involving complex composite stimuli. We find that all models can be well-fitted, that the best model generally varies between neurons and that statistical comparisons between neuronal responses across different experimental conditions are affected quantitatively and qualitatively by specific model choices. As a robust alternative to an often arbitrary model selection, we introduce a model-free approach, in which features of interest are extracted directly from the measured response data without the need of fitting any model. In our attentional datasets, we demonstrate that data-driven methods provide descriptions of tuning curve features such as preferred stimulus direction or attentional gain modulations which are in agreement with fit-based approaches when a good fit exists. Furthermore, these methods naturally extend to the frequent cases of uncertain model selection. We show that model-free approaches can identify attentional modulation patterns, such as general alterations of the irregular shape of tuning curves, which cannot be captured by fitting stereotyped conventional models. Finally, by comparing datasets across different conditions, we demonstrate effects of attention that are cell- and even stimulus-specific. Based on these proofs-of-concept, we conclude that our data-driven methods can reliably extract relevant tuning information from neuronal recordings, including cells whose seemingly haphazard response curves defy conventional fitting approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Helmer & Vladislav Kozyrev & Valeska Stephan & Stefan Treue & Theo Geisel & Demian Battaglia, 2016. "Model-Free Estimation of Tuning Curves and Their Attentional Modulation, Based on Sparse and Noisy Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-33, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0146500
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0146500
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0146500&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0146500?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gašper Tkačik & Olivier Marre & Dario Amodei & Elad Schneidman & William Bialek & Michael J Berry II, 2014. "Searching for Collective Behavior in a Large Network of Sensory Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Ho Ko & Sonja B. Hofer & Bruno Pichler & Katherine A. Buchanan & P. Jesper Sjöström & Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel, 2011. "Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 473(7345), pages 87-91, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vladislav Kozyrev & Mohammad Reza Daliri & Philipp Schwedhelm & Stefan Treue, 2019. "Strategic deployment of feature-based attentional gain in primate visual cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-28, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bettina Voelcker & Ravi Pancholi & Simon Peron, 2022. "Transformation of primary sensory cortical representations from layer 4 to layer 2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Christopher Ebsch & Robert Rosenbaum, 2018. "Imbalanced amplification: A mechanism of amplification and suppression from local imbalance of excitation and inhibition in cortical circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Pau Farré & Eldon Emberly, 2018. "A maximum-entropy model for predicting chromatin contacts," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Jason S Prentice & Olivier Marre & Mark L Ioffe & Adrianna R Loback & Gašper Tkačik & Michael J Berry II, 2016. "Error-Robust Modes of the Retinal Population Code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, November.
    6. Jan Humplik & Gašper Tkačik, 2017. "Probabilistic models for neural populations that naturally capture global coupling and criticality," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, September.
    7. Urs Köster & Jascha Sohl-Dickstein & Charles M Gray & Bruno A Olshausen, 2014. "Modeling Higher-Order Correlations within Cortical Microcolumns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    9. Thaddeus R Cybulski & Edward S Boyden & George M Church & Keith E J Tyo & Konrad P Kording, 2017. "Nucleotide-time alignment for molecular recorders," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Suchin S Gururangan & Alexander J Sadovsky & Jason N MacLean, 2014. "Analysis of Graph Invariants in Functional Neocortical Circuitry Reveals Generalized Features Common to Three Areas of Sensory Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    11. Alok Maity & Roy Wollman, 2020. "Information transmission from NFkB signaling dynamics to gene expression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Takafumi Arakaki & G Barello & Yashar Ahmadian, 2019. "Inferring neural circuit structure from datasets of heterogeneous tuning curves," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-38, April.
    13. Dimitri Yatsenko & Krešimir Josić & Alexander S Ecker & Emmanouil Froudarakis & R James Cotton & Andreas S Tolias, 2015. "Improved Estimation and Interpretation of Correlations in Neural Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, March.
    14. Jeyadarshan Jeyabalaratnam & Vishal Bharmauria & Lyes Bachatene & Sarah Cattan & Annie Angers & Stéphane Molotchnikoff, 2013. "Adaptation Shifts Preferred Orientation of Tuning Curve in the Mouse Visual Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-8, May.
    15. Valle, Mauricio A. & Ruz, Gonzalo A. & Rica, Sergio, 2019. "Market basket analysis by solving the inverse Ising problem: Discovering pairwise interaction strengths among products," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 524(C), pages 36-44.
    16. Pierre Yger & Kenneth D Harris, 2013. "The Convallis Rule for Unsupervised Learning in Cortical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Molan Li & Da Li & Junxing Zhang & Xuanlu Xiang & Di Zhao, 2023. "Dynamics of Optimal Cue Integration with Time-Varying Delay in the Insects’ Navigation System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Bartul Mimica & Tuçe Tombaz & Claudia Battistin & Jingyi Guo Fuglstad & Benjamin A. Dunn & Jonathan R. Whitlock, 2023. "Behavioral decomposition reveals rich encoding structure employed across neocortex in rats," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Ryan C Williamson & Benjamin R Cowley & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron & Adam Kohn & Matthew A Smith & Byron M Yu, 2016. "Scaling Properties of Dimensionality Reduction for Neural Populations and Network Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-27, December.
    20. Christian Donner & Klaus Obermayer & Hideaki Shimazaki, 2017. "Approximate Inference for Time-Varying Interactions and Macroscopic Dynamics of Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0146500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.