IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Signatures of criticality arise from random subsampling in simple population models

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel Nonnenmacher
  • Christian Behrens
  • Philipp Berens
  • Matthias Bethge
  • Jakob H Macke

Abstract

The rise of large-scale recordings of neuronal activity has fueled the hope to gain new insights into the collective activity of neural ensembles. How can one link the statistics of neural population activity to underlying principles and theories? One attempt to interpret such data builds upon analogies to the behaviour of collective systems in statistical physics. Divergence of the specific heat—a measure of population statistics derived from thermodynamics—has been used to suggest that neural populations are optimized to operate at a “critical point”. However, these findings have been challenged by theoretical studies which have shown that common inputs can lead to diverging specific heat. Here, we connect “signatures of criticality”, and in particular the divergence of specific heat, back to statistics of neural population activity commonly studied in neural coding: firing rates and pairwise correlations. We show that the specific heat diverges whenever the average correlation strength does not depend on population size. This is necessarily true when data with correlations is randomly subsampled during the analysis process, irrespective of the detailed structure or origin of correlations. We also show how the characteristic shape of specific heat capacity curves depends on firing rates and correlations, using both analytically tractable models and numerical simulations of a canonical feed-forward population model. To analyze these simulations, we develop efficient methods for characterizing large-scale neural population activity with maximum entropy models. We find that, consistent with experimental findings, increases in firing rates and correlation directly lead to more pronounced signatures. Thus, previous reports of thermodynamical criticality in neural populations based on the analysis of specific heat can be explained by average firing rates and correlations, and are not indicative of an optimized coding strategy. We conclude that a reliable interpretation of statistical tests for theories of neural coding is possible only in reference to relevant ground-truth models.Author summary: Understanding how populations of neurons collectively encode sensory information is one of the central goals of computational neuroscience. In physics, systems are often characterized by identifying and describing critical points (e.g. the transition between two states of matter). The success of this approach has inspired a series of studies to search for analogous phenomena in nervous systems, and has lead to the hypothesis that these might be optimized to be poised at ‘thermodynamic critical points’. However, translating concepts from thermodynamics to neural data analysis has been a challenging endeavour. We here study the data analysis approaches that have been used to provide evidence for criticality in the brain. We find that observing signatures of criticality is closely linked to observing activity correlations between neurons– a ubiquitous phenomenon in neural data. Our study questions the experimental evidence that neural systems are optimised to exhibit thermodynamic critical behaviour. Finally, we provide practical, open-source tools for analyzing large-scale measurements of neural population activity using maximum entropy models.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Nonnenmacher & Christian Behrens & Philipp Berens & Matthias Bethge & Jakob H Macke, 2017. "Signatures of criticality arise from random subsampling in simple population models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005718
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005718
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005718&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005718?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toshihiko Hosoya & Stephen A. Baccus & Markus Meister, 2005. "Dynamic predictive coding by the retina," Nature, Nature, vol. 436(7047), pages 71-77, July.
    2. Gašper Tkačik & Olivier Marre & Dario Amodei & Elad Schneidman & William Bialek & Michael J Berry II, 2014. "Searching for Collective Behavior in a Large Network of Sensory Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Jonathan W. Pillow & Jonathon Shlens & Liam Paninski & Alexander Sher & Alan M. Litke & E. J. Chichilnisky & Eero P. Simoncelli, 2008. "Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7207), pages 995-999, August.
    4. Laurence Aitchison & Nicola Corradi & Peter E Latham, 2016. "Zipf’s Law Arises Naturally When There Are Underlying, Unobserved Variables," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-32, December.
    5. Iacopo Mastromatteo & Matteo Marsili, 2011. "On the criticality of inferred models," Papers 1102.1624, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2011.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Humplik & Gašper Tkačik, 2017. "Probabilistic models for neural populations that naturally capture global coupling and criticality," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Jason S Prentice & Olivier Marre & Mark L Ioffe & Adrianna R Loback & Gašper Tkačik & Michael J Berry II, 2016. "Error-Robust Modes of the Retinal Population Code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, November.
    3. Urs Köster & Jascha Sohl-Dickstein & Charles M Gray & Bruno A Olshausen, 2014. "Modeling Higher-Order Correlations within Cortical Microcolumns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Christian Donner & Klaus Obermayer & Hideaki Shimazaki, 2017. "Approximate Inference for Time-Varying Interactions and Macroscopic Dynamics of Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Stojan Jovanović & Stefan Rotter, 2016. "Interplay between Graph Topology and Correlations of Third Order in Spiking Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, June.
    6. Arne F Meyer & Jan-Philipp Diepenbrock & Max F K Happel & Frank W Ohl & Jörn Anemüller, 2014. "Discriminative Learning of Receptive Fields from Responses to Non-Gaussian Stimulus Ensembles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Matthias S Keil & Agata Lapedriza & David Masip & Jordi Vitria, 2008. "Preferred Spatial Frequencies for Human Face Processing Are Associated with Optimal Class Discrimination in the Machine," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(7), pages 1-5, July.
    8. Patrick Erik Bradley & Martin Behnisch, 2019. "Heavy-tailed distributions for building stock data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(7), pages 1281-1296, September.
    9. Mark L Ioffe & Michael J Berry II, 2017. "The structured ‘low temperature’ phase of the retinal population code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-31, October.
    10. Jonathan Rubin & Nachum Ulanovsky & Israel Nelken & Naftali Tishby, 2016. "The Representation of Prediction Error in Auditory Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Franklin Leong & Babak Rahmani & Demetri Psaltis & Christophe Moser & Diego Ghezzi, 2024. "An actor-model framework for visual sensory encoding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Lucas Rudelt & Daniel González Marx & Michael Wibral & Viola Priesemann, 2021. "Embedding optimization reveals long-lasting history dependence in neural spiking activity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-51, June.
    13. Pengcheng Zhou & Shawn D Burton & Adam C Snyder & Matthew A Smith & Nathaniel N Urban & Robert E Kass, 2015. "Establishing a Statistical Link between Network Oscillations and Neural Synchrony," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Jingyang Zhou & Noah C Benson & Kendrick Kay & Jonathan Winawer, 2019. "Predicting neuronal dynamics with a delayed gain control model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, November.
    15. Matthias S Keil, 2009. "“I Look in Your Eyes, Honey”: Internal Face Features Induce Spatial Frequency Preference for Human Face Processing," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Krishnamurthy V. Vemuru, 2022. "Implementation of the Canny Edge Detector Using a Spiking Neural Network," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Shailaja Akella & Peter Ledochowitsch & Joshua H. Siegle & Hannah Belski & Daniel D. Denman & Michael A. Buice & Severine Durand & Christof Koch & Shawn R. Olsen & Xiaoxuan Jia, 2025. "Deciphering neuronal variability across states reveals dynamic sensory encoding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Richard Naud & Wulfram Gerstner, 2012. "Coding and Decoding with Adapting Neurons: A Population Approach to the Peri-Stimulus Time Histogram," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Fanfan Li & Dingwei Li & Chuanqing Wang & Guolei Liu & Rui Wang & Huihui Ren & Yingjie Tang & Yan Wang & Yitong Chen & Kun Liang & Qi Huang & Mohamad Sawan & Min Qiu & Hong Wang & Bowen Zhu, 2024. "An artificial visual neuron with multiplexed rate and time-to-first-spike coding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Pau Farré & Eldon Emberly, 2018. "A maximum-entropy model for predicting chromatin contacts," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.