IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Membrane Properties and the Balance between Excitation and Inhibition Control Gamma-Frequency Oscillations Arising from Feedback Inhibition

Author

Listed:
  • Michael N Economo
  • John A White

Abstract

Computational studies as well as in vivo and in vitro results have shown that many cortical neurons fire in a highly irregular manner and at low average firing rates. These patterns seem to persist even when highly rhythmic signals are recorded by local field potential electrodes or other methods that quantify the summed behavior of a local population. Models of the 30–80 Hz gamma rhythm in which network oscillations arise through ‘stochastic synchrony’ capture the variability observed in the spike output of single cells while preserving network-level organization. We extend upon these results by constructing model networks constrained by experimental measurements and using them to probe the effect of biophysical parameters on network-level activity. We find in simulations that gamma-frequency oscillations are enabled by a high level of incoherent synaptic conductance input, similar to the barrage of noisy synaptic input that cortical neurons have been shown to receive in vivo. This incoherent synaptic input increases the emergent network frequency by shortening the time scale of the membrane in excitatory neurons and by reducing the temporal separation between excitation and inhibition due to decreased spike latency in inhibitory neurons. These mechanisms are demonstrated in simulations and in vitro current-clamp and dynamic-clamp experiments. Simulation results further indicate that the membrane potential noise amplitude has a large impact on network frequency and that the balance between excitatory and inhibitory currents controls network stability and sensitivity to external inputs. Author Summary: The gamma rhythm is a prominent, 30–80-Hz EEG signal that is associated with cognition. Several classes of computational models have been posited to explain the gamma rhythm mechanistically. We study a particular class in which the gamma rhythm arises from delayed negative feedback. Our study is unique in that we calibrate the model from direct measurements. We also test the model's most critical predictions directly in experiments that take advantage of cutting-edge computer technologies able to simulate ion channels in real time. Our major findings are that a large amount of “background” synaptic input to neurons is necessary to promote the gamma rhythm; that inhibitory neurons are specially tuned to keep the gamma rhythm stable; that noise has a strong effect on network frequency; and that incoming sensory input can be represented with sensitivity that depends on the strength of excitatory-excitatory synapses and the number of neurons receiving the input. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that the gamma rhythm reflects the presence of delayed feedback that controls overall cortical activity on a cycle-by-cycle basis. Furthermore, its frequency range mainly reflects the timescale of synaptic inhibition, the degree of background activity, and noise levels in the network.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael N Economo & John A White, 2012. "Membrane Properties and the Balance between Excitation and Inhibition Control Gamma-Frequency Oscillations Arising from Feedback Inhibition," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002354
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002354
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002354&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hillel Adesnik & Massimo Scanziani, 2010. "Lateral competition for cortical space by layer-specific horizontal circuits," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7292), pages 1155-1160, April.
    2. Christopher D. Harvey & Forrest Collman & Daniel A. Dombeck & David W. Tank, 2009. "Intracellular dynamics of hippocampal place cells during virtual navigation," Nature, Nature, vol. 461(7266), pages 941-946, October.
    3. Lyle J. Borg-Graham & Cyril Monier & Yves Frégnac, 1998. "Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6683), pages 369-373, May.
    4. André Fisahn & Fenella G. Pike & Eberhard H. Buhl & Ole Paulsen, 1998. "Cholinergic induction of network oscillations at 40 Hz in the hippocampus in vitro," Nature, Nature, vol. 394(6689), pages 186-189, July.
    5. Thomas Klausberger & Peter J. Magill & László F. Márton & J. David B. Roberts & Philip M. Cobden & György Buzsáki & Peter Somogyi, 2003. "Brain-state- and cell-type-specific firing of hippocampal interneurons in vivo," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6925), pages 844-848, February.
    6. Jessica A. Cardin & Marie Carlén & Konstantinos Meletis & Ulf Knoblich & Feng Zhang & Karl Deisseroth & Li-Huei Tsai & Christopher I. Moore, 2009. "Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses," Nature, Nature, vol. 459(7247), pages 663-667, June.
    7. Tomáš Hromádka & Michael R DeWeese & Anthony M Zador, 2008. "Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Edward Wallace & Marc Benayoun & Wim van Drongelen & Jack D Cowan, 2011. "Emergent Oscillations in Networks of Stochastic Spiking Neurons," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Pieter R. Roelfsema & Andreas K. Engel & Peter König & Wolf Singer, 1997. "Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas," Nature, Nature, vol. 385(6612), pages 157-161, January.
    10. David Golomb & Karnit Donner & Liron Shacham & Dan Shlosberg & Yael Amitai & David Hansel, 2007. "Mechanisms of Firing Patterns in Fast-Spiking Cortical Interneurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jung H Lee & Miles A Whittington & Nancy J Kopell, 2013. "Top-Down Beta Rhythms Support Selective Attention via Interlaminar Interaction: A Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Mohan Raghavan & Bharadwaj Amrutur & Rishikesh Narayanan & Sujit Kumar Sikdar, 2013. "Synconset Waves and Chains: Spiking Onsets in Synchronous Populations Predict and Are Predicted by Network Structure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Eric Lowet & Krishnakanth Kondabolu & Samuel Zhou & Rebecca A. Mount & Yangyang Wang & Cara R. Ravasio & Xue Han, 2022. "Deep brain stimulation creates informational lesion through membrane depolarization in mouse hippocampus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Ankita Sengupta & Sanjna Banerjee & Suhas Ganesh & Shrey Grover & Devarajan Sridharan, 2024. "The right posterior parietal cortex mediates spatial reorienting of attentional choice bias," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Deng, Bin & Deng, Yun & Yu, Haitao & Guo, Xinmeng & Wang, Jiang, 2016. "Dependence of inter-neuronal effective connectivity on synchrony dynamics in neuronal network motifs," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 48-59.
    6. Hironobu Osaki & Moeko Kanaya & Yoshifumi Ueta & Mariko Miyata, 2022. "Distinct nociception processing in the dysgranular and barrel regions of the mouse somatosensory cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Sorinel A Oprisan & Xandre Clementsmith & Tamas Tompa & Antonieta Lavin, 2019. "Dopamine receptor antagonists effects on low-dimensional attractors of local field potentials in optogenetic mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-39, October.
    8. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Oren Amsalem & Hidehiko Inagaki & Jianing Yu & Karel Svoboda & Ran Darshan, 2024. "Sub-threshold neuronal activity and the dynamical regime of cerebral cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Catalina Vich & Rafel Prohens & Antonio E. Teruel & Antoni Guillamon, 2020. "Estimation of Synaptic Activity during Neuronal Oscillations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Christopher Ebsch & Robert Rosenbaum, 2018. "Imbalanced amplification: A mechanism of amplification and suppression from local imbalance of excitation and inhibition in cortical circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Corentin Massot & Adam D Schneider & Maurice J Chacron & Kathleen E Cullen, 2012. "The Vestibular System Implements a Linear–Nonlinear Transformation In Order to Encode Self-Motion," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Ruxandra Barzan & Beyza Bozkurt & Mohammadreza M. Nejad & Sandra T. Süß & Tatjana Surdin & Hanna Böke & Katharina Spoida & Zohre Azimi & Michelle Grömmke & Dennis Eickelbeck & Melanie D. Mark & Lennar, 2024. "Gain control of sensory input across polysynaptic circuitries in mouse visual cortex by a single G protein-coupled receptor type (5-HT2A)," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Michael A Carlin & Mounya Elhilali, 2013. "Sustained Firing of Model Central Auditory Neurons Yields a Discriminative Spectro-temporal Representation for Natural Sounds," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Andrea Alamia & Rufin VanRullen, 2019. "Alpha oscillations and traveling waves: Signatures of predictive coding?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, October.
    16. Nozomu H. Nakamura & Hidemasa Furue & Kenta Kobayashi & Yoshitaka Oku, 2023. "Hippocampal ensemble dynamics and memory performance are modulated by respiration during encoding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Florian Raudies & Michael E Hasselmo, 2012. "Modeling Boundary Vector Cell Firing Given Optic Flow as a Cue," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Christian G Fink & Victoria Booth & Michal Zochowski, 2011. "Cellularly-Driven Differences in Network Synchronization Propensity Are Differentially Modulated by Firing Frequency," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Wolfgang Maass & Prashant Joshi & Eduardo D Sontag, 2007. "Computational Aspects of Feedback in Neural Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Andreas Wilmer & Marc de Lussanet & Markus Lappe, 2012. "Time-Delayed Mutual Information of the Phase as a Measure of Functional Connectivity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.