IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/0020165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computational Aspects of Feedback in Neural Circuits

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Maass
  • Prashant Joshi
  • Eduardo D Sontag

Abstract

It has previously been shown that generic cortical microcircuit models can perform complex real-time computations on continuous input streams, provided that these computations can be carried out with a rapidly fading memory. We investigate the computational capability of such circuits in the more realistic case where not only readout neurons, but in addition a few neurons within the circuit, have been trained for specific tasks. This is essentially equivalent to the case where the output of trained readout neurons is fed back into the circuit. We show that this new model overcomes the limitation of a rapidly fading memory. In fact, we prove that in the idealized case without noise it can carry out any conceivable digital or analog computation on time-varying inputs. But even with noise, the resulting computational model can perform a large class of biologically relevant real-time computations that require a nonfading memory. We demonstrate these computational implications of feedback both theoretically, and through computer simulations of detailed cortical microcircuit models that are subject to noise and have complex inherent dynamics. We show that the application of simple learning procedures (such as linear regression or perceptron learning) to a few neurons enables such circuits to represent time over behaviorally relevant long time spans, to integrate evidence from incoming spike trains over longer periods of time, and to process new information contained in such spike trains in diverse ways according to the current internal state of the circuit. In particular we show that such generic cortical microcircuits with feedback provide a new model for working memory that is consistent with a large set of biological constraints. Although this article examines primarily the computational role of feedback in circuits of neurons, the mathematical principles on which its analysis is based apply to a variety of dynamical systems. Hence they may also throw new light on the computational role of feedback in other complex biological dynamical systems, such as, for example, genetic regulatory networks.Author Summary: Circuits of neurons in the brain have an abundance of feedback connections, both on the level of local microcircuits and on the level of synaptic connections between brain areas. But the functional role of these feedback connections is largely unknown. We present a computational theory that characterizes the gain in computational power that feedback can provide in such circuits. It shows that feedback endows standard models for neural circuits with the capability to emulate arbitrary Turing machines. In fact, with suitable feedback they can simulate any dynamical system, in particular any conceivable analog computer. Under realistic noise conditions, the computational power of these circuits is necessarily reduced. But we demonstrate through computer simulations that feedback also provides a significant gain in computational power for quite detailed models of cortical microcircuits with in vivo–like high levels of noise. In particular it enables generic cortical microcircuits to carry out computations that combine information from working memory and persistent internal states in real time with new information from online input streams.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Maass & Prashant Joshi & Eduardo D Sontag, 2007. "Computational Aspects of Feedback in Neural Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020165
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020165
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020165&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dax A. Hoffman & Jeffrey C. Magee & Costa M. Colbert & Daniel Johnston, 1997. "K+ channel regulation of signal propagation in dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 387(6636), pages 869-875, June.
    2. Olaf Sporns & Rolf Kötter, 2004. "Motifs in Brain Networks," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-1, October.
    3. Lyle J. Borg-Graham & Cyril Monier & Yves Frégnac, 1998. "Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6683), pages 369-373, May.
    4. Alain Destexhe & Eve Marder, 2004. "Plasticity in single neuron and circuit computations," Nature, Nature, vol. 431(7010), pages 789-795, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dimitri Nowicki & Patrick Verga & Hava Siegelmann, 2013. "Modeling Reconsolidation in Kernel Associative Memory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-10, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yaru & Liu, Shenquan & Zhan, Feibiao & Zhang, Xiaohan, 2020. "Firing patterns of the modified Hodgkin–Huxley models subject to Taylor ’s formula," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
    2. Christoph Schmidt & Thomas Weiss & Thomas Lehmann & Herbert Witte & Lutz Leistritz, 2013. "Extracting Labeled Topological Patterns from Samples of Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    3. Deng, Bin & Deng, Yun & Yu, Haitao & Guo, Xinmeng & Wang, Jiang, 2016. "Dependence of inter-neuronal effective connectivity on synchrony dynamics in neuronal network motifs," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 48-59.
    4. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Songting Li & Nan Liu & Xiao-hui Zhang & Douglas Zhou & David Cai, 2014. "Bilinearity in Spatiotemporal Integration of Synaptic Inputs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Catalina Vich & Rafel Prohens & Antonio E. Teruel & Antoni Guillamon, 2020. "Estimation of Synaptic Activity during Neuronal Oscillations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Ruxandra Barzan & Beyza Bozkurt & Mohammadreza M. Nejad & Sandra T. Süß & Tatjana Surdin & Hanna Böke & Katharina Spoida & Zohre Azimi & Michelle Grömmke & Dennis Eickelbeck & Melanie D. Mark & Lennar, 2024. "Gain control of sensory input across polysynaptic circuitries in mouse visual cortex by a single G protein-coupled receptor type (5-HT2A)," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Xing, Miaomiao & Song, Xinlin & Wang, Hengtong & Yang, Zhuoqin & Chen, Yong, 2022. "Frequency synchronization and excitabilities of two coupled heterogeneous Morris-Lecar neurons," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Christos Ellinas & Neil Allan & Anders Johansson, 2016. "Exploring Structural Patterns Across Evolved and Designed Systems: A Network Perspective," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 179-192, May.
    10. Michael N Economo & John A White, 2012. "Membrane Properties and the Balance between Excitation and Inhibition Control Gamma-Frequency Oscillations Arising from Feedback Inhibition," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Dimitrios TSIOTAS & Serafeim POLYZOS, 2024. "Analyzing The Spatial Interactions In The Nationwide Regional Capitals Network Of Greece," Sustainable Regional Development Scientific Journal, Sustainable Regional Development Scientific Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 73-81, March.
    12. Wylie, Dennis Cates, 2009. "Linked by loops: Network structure and switch integration in complex dynamical systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(9), pages 1946-1958.
    13. Zhenrui Liao & Kevin C. Gonzalez & Deborah M. Li & Catalina M. Yang & Donald Holder & Natalie E. McClain & Guofeng Zhang & Stephen W. Evans & Mariya Chavarha & Jane Simko & Christopher D. Makinson & M, 2024. "Functional architecture of intracellular oscillations in hippocampal dendrites," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Pojeong Park & J. David Wong-Campos & Daniel G. Itkis & Byung Hun Lee & Yitong Qi & Hunter C. Davis & Benjamin Antin & Amol Pasarkar & Jonathan B. Grimm & Sarah E. Plutkis & Katie L. Holland & Liam Pa, 2025. "Dendritic excitations govern back-propagation via a spike-rate accelerometer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Valentin Markounikau & Christian Igel & Amiram Grinvald & Dirk Jancke, 2010. "A Dynamic Neural Field Model of Mesoscopic Cortical Activity Captured with Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    16. Tomoki Kurikawa & Kunihiko Kaneko, 2013. "Embedding Responses in Spontaneous Neural Activity Shaped through Sequential Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Alon Poleg-Polsky & Jeffrey S Diamond, 2011. "Imperfect Space Clamp Permits Electrotonic Interactions between Inhibitory and Excitatory Synaptic Conductances, Distorting Voltage Clamp Recordings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, April.
    18. Deng, Bin & Zhu, Zechen & Yang, Shuangming & Wei, Xile & Wang, Jiang & Yu, Haitao, 2016. "FPGA implementation of motifs-based neuronal network and synchronization analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 388-402.
    19. Hanbaek Lyu & Yacoub H. Kureh & Joshua Vendrow & Mason A. Porter, 2024. "Learning low-rank latent mesoscale structures in networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Zhou, Peipei & Cai, Shuiming & Liu, Zengrong & Chen, Luonan & Wang, Ruiqi, 2013. "Coupling switches and oscillators as a means to shape cellular signals in biomolecular systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-126.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.