IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1001069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gene Expression Noise in Spatial Patterning: hunchback Promoter Structure Affects Noise Amplitude and Distribution in Drosophila Segmentation

Author

Listed:
  • David M Holloway
  • Francisco J P Lopes
  • Luciano da Fontoura Costa
  • Bruno A N Travençolo
  • Nina Golyandina
  • Konstantin Usevich
  • Alexander V Spirov

Abstract

Positional information in developing embryos is specified by spatial gradients of transcriptional regulators. One of the classic systems for studying this is the activation of the hunchback (hb) gene in early fruit fly (Drosophila) segmentation by the maternally-derived gradient of the Bicoid (Bcd) protein. Gene regulation is subject to intrinsic noise which can produce variable expression. This variability must be constrained in the highly reproducible and coordinated events of development. We identify means by which noise is controlled during gene expression by characterizing the dependence of hb mRNA and protein output noise on hb promoter structure and transcriptional dynamics. We use a stochastic model of the hb promoter in which the number and strength of Bcd and Hb (self-regulatory) binding sites can be varied. Model parameters are fit to data from WT embryos, the self-regulation mutant hb14F, and lacZ reporter constructs using different portions of the hb promoter. We have corroborated model noise predictions experimentally. The results indicate that WT (self-regulatory) Hb output noise is predominantly dependent on the transcription and translation dynamics of its own expression, rather than on Bcd fluctuations. The constructs and mutant, which lack self-regulation, indicate that the multiple Bcd binding sites in the hb promoter (and their strengths) also play a role in buffering noise. The model is robust to the variation in Bcd binding site number across a number of fly species. This study identifies particular ways in which promoter structure and regulatory dynamics reduce hb output noise. Insofar as many of these are common features of genes (e.g. multiple regulatory sites, cooperativity, self-feedback), the current results contribute to the general understanding of the reproducibility and determinacy of spatial patterning in early development.Author Summary: Noise is an intrinsic part of biochemical systems such as gene regulation networks. Noisy gene expression has been well documented in populations of single cells, and is likely a key mechanism in evolutionary change. But in developing embryos, cells within a tissue must overcome such variability in order to provide the uniformity required to coordinate multiple events. Reproducibility and determinacy of the spatial protein patterns preceding tissue differentiation is a critical aspect of development. In this study, we use anterior-posterior (AP) segmentation in the fruit fly (Drosophila) to understand how gene regulation dynamics control noise. One of the earliest AP patterning events is the anterior activation of the hunchback (hb) gene by the maternally-derived Bicoid (Bcd) protein gradient. This interaction has been very well characterized, providing the tools for us to develop a stochastic model of hb gene regulation to make predictions about expression noise, and to corroborate these experimentally. For hb, we show that self-regulation is a critical part of controlling noise, and the multiple Bcd binding sites in the hb promoter also enhance pattern reproducibility. To the degree that such features are shared by other genes, these noise-reducing mechanisms may be common to many pattern forming events.

Suggested Citation

  • David M Holloway & Francisco J P Lopes & Luciano da Fontoura Costa & Bruno A N Travençolo & Nina Golyandina & Konstantin Usevich & Alexander V Spirov, 2011. "Gene Expression Noise in Spatial Patterning: hunchback Promoter Structure Affects Noise Amplitude and Distribution in Drosophila Segmentation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1001069
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001069&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bahram Houchmandzadeh & Eric Wieschaus & Stanislas Leibler, 2002. "Establishment of developmental precision and proportions in the early Drosophila embryo," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6873), pages 798-802, February.
    2. Avigdor Eldar & Vasant K. Chary & Panagiotis Xenopoulos & Michelle E. Fontes & Oliver C. Losón & Jonathan Dworkin & Patrick J. Piggot & Michael B. Elowitz, 2009. "Partial penetrance facilitates developmental evolution in bacteria," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7254), pages 510-514, July.
    3. Christopher V. Rao & Denise M. Wolf & Adam P. Arkin, 2002. "Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise," Nature, Nature, vol. 420(6912), pages 231-237, November.
    4. Elena M. Lucchetta & Ji Hwan Lee & Lydia A. Fu & Nipam H. Patel & Rustem F. Ismagilov, 2005. "Dynamics of Drosophila embryonic patterning network perturbed in space and time using microfluidics," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7037), pages 1134-1138, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David M Holloway & Alexander V Spirov, 2017. "Transcriptional bursting in Drosophila development: Stochastic dynamics of eve stripe 2 expression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingyuan Deng & Wei Wang & Long Jason Lu & Jun Ma, 2010. "A Two-Dimensional Simulation Model of the Bicoid Gradient in Drosophila," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Junjie Luo & Jun Wang & Ting Martin Ma & Zhirong Sun, 2010. "Reverse Engineering of Bacterial Chemotaxis Pathway via Frequency Domain Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-8, March.
    3. Ankit Gupta & Mustafa Khammash, 2022. "Frequency spectra and the color of cellular noise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Roman Vetter & Dagmar Iber, 2022. "Precision of morphogen gradients in neural tube development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Lucy Ham & Megan A. Coomer & Kaan Öcal & Ramon Grima & Michael P. H. Stumpf, 2024. "A stochastic vs deterministic perspective on the timing of cellular events," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Casper J Breuker & James S Patterson & Christian Peter Klingenberg, 2006. "A Single Basis for Developmental Buffering of Drosophila Wing Shape," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(1), pages 1-7, December.
    7. Burton W Andrews & Pablo A Iglesias, 2007. "An Information-Theoretic Characterization of the Optimal Gradient Sensing Response of Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-9, August.
    8. Jeremy A. Owen & Jordan M. Horowitz, 2023. "Size limits the sensitivity of kinetic schemes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Arantxa Urchueguía & Luca Galbusera & Dany Chauvin & Gwendoline Bellement & Thomas Julou & Erik van Nimwegen, 2021. "Genome-wide gene expression noise in Escherichia coli is condition-dependent and determined by propagation of noise through the regulatory network," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Mark Hallen & Bochong Li & Yu Tanouchi & Cheemeng Tan & Mike West & Lingchong You, 2011. "Computation of Steady-State Probability Distributions in Stochastic Models of Cellular Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Ankit Gupta & Corentin Briat & Mustafa Khammash, 2014. "A Scalable Computational Framework for Establishing Long-Term Behavior of Stochastic Reaction Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Lucia Marucci & David A W Barton & Irene Cantone & Maria Aurelia Ricci & Maria Pia Cosma & Stefania Santini & Diego di Bernardo & Mario di Bernardo, 2009. "How to Turn a Genetic Circuit into a Synthetic Tunable Oscillator, or a Bistable Switch," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Singh, Shakti Nath & Chanu, Athokpam Langlen & Malik, Md. Zubbair & Singh, R.K. Brojen, 2021. "Interplay of cellular states: Role of delay as control mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    14. Thounaojam, Umeshkanta Singh, 2022. "Stochastic chaos in chemical Lorenz system: Interplay of intrinsic noise and nonlinearity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    15. Shuangyu Bi & Manika Kargeti & Remy Colin & Niklas Farke & Hannes Link & Victor Sourjik, 2023. "Dynamic fluctuations in a bacterial metabolic network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Xueying C. Li & Lautaro Gandara & Måns Ekelöf & Kerstin Richter & Theodore Alexandrov & Justin Crocker, 2024. "Rapid response of fly populations to gene dosage across development and generations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Nolan Frey & Utku M. Sönmez & Jonathan Minden & Philip LeDuc, 2022. "Microfluidics for understanding model organisms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Jordi Heijman & Antonio Zaza & Daniel M Johnson & Yoram Rudy & Ralf L M Peeters & Paul G A Volders & Ronald L Westra, 2013. "Determinants of Beat-to-Beat Variability of Repolarization Duration in the Canine Ventricular Myocyte: A Computational Analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Burton W Andrews & Tau-Mu Yi & Pablo A Iglesias, 2006. "Optimal Noise Filtering in the Chemotactic Response of Escherichia coli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-12, November.
    20. Benjamin B Kaufmann & Qiong Yang & Jerome T Mettetal & Alexander van Oudenaarden, 2007. "Heritable Stochastic Switching Revealed by Single-Cell Genealogy," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-8, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1001069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.