IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness of the Dorsal morphogen gradient with respect to morphogen dosage

Author

Listed:
  • Hadel Al Asafen
  • Prasad U Bandodkar
  • Sophia Carrell-Noel
  • Allison E Schloop
  • Jeramey Friedman
  • Gregory T Reeves

Abstract

In multicellular organisms, the timing and placement of gene expression in a developing tissue assigns the fate of each cell in the embryo in order for a uniform field of cells to differentiate into a reproducible pattern of organs and tissues. This positional information is often achieved through the action of spatial gradients of morphogens. Spatial patterns of gene expression are paradoxically robust to variations in morphogen dosage, given that, by definition, gene expression must be sensitive to morphogen concentration. In this work we investigate the robustness of the Dorsal/NF-κB signaling module with respect to perturbations to the dosage of maternally-expressed dorsal mRNA. The Dorsal morphogen gradient patterns the dorsal-ventral axis of the early Drosophila embryo, and we found that an empirical description of the Dorsal gradient is highly sensitive to maternal dorsal dosage. In contrast, we found experimentally that gene expression patterns are highly robust. Although the components of this signaling module have been characterized in detail, how their function is integrated to produce robust gene expression patterns to variations in the dorsal maternal dosage is still unclear. Therefore, we analyzed a mechanistic model of the Dorsal signaling module and found that Cactus, a cytoplasmic inhibitor for Dorsal, must be present in the nucleus for the system to be robust. Furthermore, active Toll, the receptor that dissociates Cactus from Dorsal, must be saturated. Finally, the vast majority of robust descriptions of the system require facilitated diffusion of Dorsal by Cactus. Each of these three recently-discovered mechanisms of the Dorsal module are critical for robustness. These mechanisms synergistically contribute to changing the amplitude and shape of the active Dorsal gradient, which is required for robust gene expression. Our work highlights the need for quantitative understanding of biophysical mechanisms of morphogen gradients in order to understand emergent phenotypes, such as robustness.Author summary: The early stages of development of an embryo are crucial for laying the foundation of the body plan. The blueprint of this plan is encoded in long-range spatial protein gradients called morphogens. This positional information is then interpreted by nuclei that begin to differentiate by expressing different genes. In fruit fly embryos, the Dorsal morphogen forms a gradient along the dorsal-ventral axis, with a maximum at the ventral midline. This gradient, and the resulting gene expression patterns are extraordinarily robust to variations in developmental conditions, even during early stages of development. Since positional information is interpreted in terms of concentration of the morphogen, one would expect that doubling or halving dosage would result in disastrous consequences for the embryo. However, we observed that development remains robust. We quantified the effect of dosage by experimentally measuring the boundaries of 2 genes,—sna and sog, expressed along the DV axis and found that variation in the boundaries of these genes was minimal, across embryos with different dosages of Dl. We then used a mathematical model to discern components of the Dl system responsible for buffering the effects of dosage and found three specific mechanisms–deconvolution, Toll saturation and shuttling. These biophysical mechanisms, built into the early developing embryo, ensure robustness of target gene expression when dosage of the Dl morphogen is altered.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadel Al Asafen & Prasad U Bandodkar & Sophia Carrell-Noel & Allison E Schloop & Jeramey Friedman & Gregory T Reeves, 2020. "Robustness of the Dorsal morphogen gradient with respect to morphogen dosage," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007750
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007750
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007750&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bahram Houchmandzadeh & Eric Wieschaus & Stanislas Leibler, 2002. "Establishment of developmental precision and proportions in the early Drosophila embryo," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6873), pages 798-802, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yurie Okabe-Oho & Hiroki Murakami & Suguru Oho & Masaki Sasai, 2009. "Stable, Precise, and Reproducible Patterning of Bicoid and Hunchback Molecules in the Early Drosophila Embryo," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Roman Vetter & Dagmar Iber, 2022. "Precision of morphogen gradients in neural tube development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Francisco J P Lopes & Fernando M C Vieira & David M Holloway & Paulo M Bisch & Alexander V Spirov, 2008. "Spatial Bistability Generates hunchback Expression Sharpness in the Drosophila Embryo," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Casper J Breuker & James S Patterson & Christian Peter Klingenberg, 2006. "A Single Basis for Developmental Buffering of Drosophila Wing Shape," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. David M Holloway & Alexander V Spirov, 2015. "Mid-Embryo Patterning and Precision in Drosophila Segmentation: Krüppel Dual Regulation of hunchback," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Shawn C Little & Gašper Tkačik & Thomas B Kneeland & Eric F Wieschaus & Thomas Gregor, 2011. "The Formation of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient Requires Protein Movement from Anteriorly Localized mRNA," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Jeremy A. Owen & Jordan M. Horowitz, 2023. "Size limits the sensitivity of kinetic schemes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. David M Holloway & Francisco J P Lopes & Luciano da Fontoura Costa & Bruno A N Travençolo & Nina Golyandina & Konstantin Usevich & Alexander V Spirov, 2011. "Gene Expression Noise in Spatial Patterning: hunchback Promoter Structure Affects Noise Amplitude and Distribution in Drosophila Segmentation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Xueying C. Li & Lautaro Gandara & Måns Ekelöf & Kerstin Richter & Theodore Alexandrov & Justin Crocker, 2024. "Rapid response of fly populations to gene dosage across development and generations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Jingyuan Deng & Wei Wang & Long Jason Lu & Jun Ma, 2010. "A Two-Dimensional Simulation Model of the Bicoid Gradient in Drosophila," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-11, April.
    11. Manu & Svetlana Surkova & Alexander V Spirov & Vitaly V Gursky & Hilde Janssens & Ah-Ram Kim & Ovidiu Radulescu & Carlos E Vanario-Alonso & David H Sharp & Maria Samsonova & John Reinitz, 2009. "Canalization of Gene Expression in the Drosophila Blastoderm by Gap Gene Cross Regulation," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, March.
    12. Andrew C Ahn & Muneesh Tewari & Chi-Sang Poon & Russell S Phillips, 2006. "The Limits of Reductionism in Medicine: Could Systems Biology Offer an Alternative?," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-1, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.