IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v67y2016i12d10.1057_s41274-016-0003-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimizing maximum cost on a single machine with two competing agents and job rejection

Author

Listed:
  • Baruch Mor

    (Ariel University)

  • Gur Mosheiov

    (The Hebrew University)

Abstract

The classical Lawler’s Algorithm provides an optimal solution to the single-machine scheduling problem, where the objective is minimizing maximum cost, given general non-decreasing, job-dependent cost functions, and general precedence constraints. First, we extend this algorithm to allow job rejection, where the scheduler may decide to process only a subset of the jobs. Then, we further extend the model to a setting of two competing agents, sharing the same processor. Both extensions are shown to be solved in polynomial time.

Suggested Citation

  • Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2016. "Minimizing maximum cost on a single machine with two competing agents and job rejection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(12), pages 1524-1531, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:67:y:2016:i:12:d:10.1057_s41274-016-0003-8
    DOI: 10.1057/s41274-016-0003-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41274-016-0003-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41274-016-0003-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. L. Lawler, 1973. "Optimal Sequencing of a Single Machine Subject to Precedence Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(5), pages 544-546, January.
    2. Dvir Shabtay & Omri Dover & Moshe Kaspi, 2015. "Single-machine two-agent scheduling involving a just-in-time criterion," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(9), pages 2590-2604, May.
    3. Mor, Baruch & Mosheiov, Gur, 2010. "Scheduling problems with two competing agents to minimize minmax and minsum earliness measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 540-546, November.
    4. S Gawiejnowicz & W-C Lee & C-L Lin & C-C Wu, 2011. "Single-machine scheduling of proportionally deteriorating jobs by two agents," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(11), pages 1983-1991, November.
    5. Shabtay, Dvir, 2014. "The single machine serial batch scheduling problem with rejection to minimize total completion time and total rejection cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 64-74.
    6. B Mor & G Mosheiov, 2014. "Polynomial time solutions for scheduling problems on a proportionate flowshop with two competing agents," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(1), pages 151-157, January.
    7. L Q Zhang & L F Lu & C T Ng, 2012. "The unbounded parallel-batch scheduling with rejection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 63(3), pages 293-298, March.
    8. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2014. "A common framework and taxonomy for multicriteria scheduling problems with interfering and competing jobs: Multi-agent scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 1-16.
    9. Oron, Daniel & Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George, 2015. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents and equal job processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 86-99.
    10. Ou, Jinwen & Zhong, Xueling & Wang, Guoqing, 2015. "An improved heuristic for parallel machine scheduling with rejection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 653-661.
    11. S Gawiejnowicz & W-C Lee & C-L Lin & C-C Wu, 2011. "Single-machine scheduling of proportionally deteriorating jobs by two agents," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(11), pages 1983-1991, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov & Dana Shapira, 2021. "Single machine lot scheduling with optional job-rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2021. "A note: flowshop scheduling with linear deterioration and job-rejection," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 103-111, March.
    3. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov & Dana Shapira, 2020. "Flowshop scheduling with learning effect and job rejection," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 631-641, December.
    4. Baruch Mor, 2023. "Single machine scheduling problems involving job-dependent step-deterioration dates and job rejection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Oron, Daniel, 2021. "Two-agent scheduling problems under rejection budget constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2018. "A note: minimizing total absolute deviation of job completion times on unrelated machines with general position-dependent processing times and job-rejection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1079-1085, December.
    7. Ruyan He & Jinjiang Yuan, 2020. "Two-Agent Preemptive Pareto-Scheduling to Minimize Late Work and Other Criteria," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Baruch Mor, 2019. "Minmax scheduling problems with common due-date and completion time penalty," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 50-71, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shesh Narayan Sahu & Yuvraj Gajpal & Swapan Debbarma, 2018. "Two-agent-based single-machine scheduling with switchover time to minimize total weighted completion time and makespan objectives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 623-640, October.
    2. Fan, B.Q. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. "Two-agent scheduling in a flowshop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 376-384.
    3. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2017. "A two-agent single machine scheduling problem with due-window assignment and a common flow-allowance," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1454-1468, May.
    4. Byung-Gyoo Kim & Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2017. "Two-Machine and Two-Agent Flow Shop with Special Processing Times Structures," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(04), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Zhang, Xingong, 2021. "Two competitive agents to minimize the weighted total late work and the total completion time," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 406(C).
    6. Chen, Rubing & Geng, Zhichao & Lu, Lingfa & Yuan, Jinjiang & Zhang, Yuan, 2022. "Pareto-scheduling of two competing agents with their own equal processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 414-431.
    7. Hermelin, Danny & Kubitza, Judith-Madeleine & Shabtay, Dvir & Talmon, Nimrod & Woeginger, Gerhard J., 2019. "Scheduling two agents on a single machine: A parameterized analysis of NP-hard problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 275-286.
    8. Stanisław Gawiejnowicz, 2020. "A review of four decades of time-dependent scheduling: main results, new topics, and open problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 3-47, February.
    9. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen & Qi Feng, 2016. "Scheduling two job families on a single machine with two competitive agents," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 784-799, October.
    10. Shisheng Li & T.C.E. Cheng & C.T. Ng & Jinjiang Yuan, 2017. "Two‐agent scheduling on a single sequential and compatible batching machine," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(8), pages 628-641, December.
    11. Du-Juan Wang & Yunqiang Yin & Shuenn-Ren Cheng & T.C.E. Cheng & Chin-Chia Wu, 2016. "Due date assignment and scheduling on a single machine with two competing agents," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1152-1169, February.
    12. Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2016. "An Ordered Flow Shop with Two Agents," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(05), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Ruyan He & Jinjiang Yuan, 2020. "Two-Agent Preemptive Pareto-Scheduling to Minimize Late Work and Other Criteria," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Hongfeng Wang & Min Huang & Junwei Wang, 2019. "An effective metaheuristic algorithm for flowshop scheduling with deteriorating jobs," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(7), pages 2733-2742, October.
    15. Wan, Long & Mei, Jiajie & Du, Jiangze, 2021. "Two-agent scheduling of unit processing time jobs to minimize total weighted completion time and total weighted number of tardy jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 26-35.
    16. Yuan Gao & Jinjiang Yuan & C. T. Ng & T. C. E. Cheng, 2022. "Pareto-scheduling with family jobs or ND-agent on a parallel-batch machine to minimize the makespan and maximum cost," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 273-287, June.
    17. Ren-Xia Chen & Shi-Sheng Li, 2019. "Two-agent single-machine scheduling with cumulative deterioration," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 201-219, June.
    18. Xiaofei Liu & Weidong Li & Yaoyu Zhu, 2021. "Single Machine Vector Scheduling with General Penalties," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Omri Dover & Dvir Shabtay, 2016. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 145-178, March.
    20. Enrique Gerstl & Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2017. "Scheduling with two competing agents to minimize total weighted earliness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 227-245, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:67:y:2016:i:12:d:10.1057_s41274-016-0003-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.