IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v114y2013i3p409-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Consumer’s Willingness to Purchase Gray-Market Smartphones

Author

Listed:
  • Chun-Hsiung Liao
  • I Hsieh

Abstract

The study analyzes the influential factors of consumers’ willingness to purchase gray-market smartphones by considering the model of novelty seeking, status consumption, integrity, and perceived risk. Attitude toward counterfeit is used as mediation in the model. The causalities in the model of problematic willingness of consumer to purchase gray-market smartphones are hypothesized. A total sample of 350 respondents with 238 effective samples is collected by interviewing with questionnaires at the service counters of telecommunications operators. Structure equation modeling (SEM) is adopted in the analysis. Consumers’ attitude toward counterfeit goods is found to be positively related to the willingness of consumers to purchase gray-market smartphones, but perceived risk is negatively related to consumers’ willingness to purchase. As for personality constructs, integrity and status consumption are found to be negatively related to consumers’ attitude toward counterfeit goods, but novelty seeking is positively related to the attitude. Further, managerial implications for branded smartphone manufacturers and telecommunications regulators are provided by the research. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Chun-Hsiung Liao & I Hsieh, 2013. "Determinants of Consumer’s Willingness to Purchase Gray-Market Smartphones," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 409-424, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:114:y:2013:i:3:p:409-424
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1358-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10551-012-1358-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-012-1358-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chao, Angela & Schor, Juliet B., 1998. "Empirical tests of status consumption: Evidence from women's cosmetics," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 107-131, February.
    2. Cordell, Victor V. & Wongtada, Nittaya & Kieschnick, Robert Jr., 1996. "Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 41-53, January.
    3. Chechen Liao & Hong-Nan Lin & Yu-Ping Liu, 2010. "Predicting the Use of Pirated Software: A Contingency Model Integrating Perceived Risk with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 237-252, January.
    4. Oliver, Richard L & Bearden, William O, 1985. "Crossover Effects in the Theory of Reasoned Action: A Moderating Influence Attempt," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 324-340, December.
    5. Fraedrich, John Paul & Ferrell, O. C., 1992. "The impact of perceived risk and moral philosophy type on ethical decision making in business organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 283-295, June.
    6. Voon, Thomas Jan P. & Ngui, Kwang Sing & Agrawal, Anand, 2011. "Determinants of Willingness to Purchase Organic Food: An Exploratory Study Using Structural Equation Modeling," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Andreas I. Nicolaou & D. Harrison McKnight, 2006. "Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchanges: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 332-351, December.
    8. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1980. "Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(3), pages 283-295, December.
    9. A. Jolibert & P. Jourdan, 2005. "Marketing Research," Post-Print halshs-00095262, HAL.
    10. Bruner, Gordon II & Kumar, Anand, 2005. "Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 553-558, May.
    11. Yang, Kiseol & Jolly, Laura D., 2009. "The effects of consumer perceived value and subjective norm on mobile data service adoption between American and Korean consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 502-508.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Veronica Marozzo & Alessandra Costa & Tindara Abbate, 2024. "The relationship between the perceived product sustainability of organic food and willingness to buy: a parallel mediation effect of product traceability and consumers’ environmental concerns," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2024(4), pages 375-393, December.
    2. Anjali Morar & Tinashe Chuchu, 2015. "To Vote or Not To Vote: Marketing Factors Influencing the Voting Intention of University Students in Johannesburg," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(6), pages 81-93.
    3. Ismail Tamer Toklu & Salih Baran, 2017. "Attitude towards Counterfeit of Luxury Brands: A Research on Consumers in Turkey," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(11), pages 618-632, November.
    4. Ilva Isa & Bederiana Shyti & Kamen Spassov, 2020. "Multiple Regression Analysis used in Analysis of Private Consumption and Public Final Consumption Evolution, case of Albanian Economy," European Journal of Marketing and Economics Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, ejme_v3_i.
    5. Alexander Davidson & Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno & Michel Laroche, 2019. "Shame on You: When Materialism Leads to Purchase Intentions Toward Counterfeit Products," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 479-494, March.
    6. Qiwen Chen & Hui Liu & Peng Mao & Junjie Qian & Yongtao Tan & Xiaer Xiahou & Peng Cui, 2022. "How Does NIMBYism Influence Residents’ Behavioral Willingness to Dispose of Waste in Centralized Collection Points?—An Empirical Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    7. İbrahim Aydın & Zübeyir Çelik & Kaan Yiğenoğlu & Ayhan Cesur, 2024. "Consumers' foresight for the digital Turkish lira: an empirical study," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 214-228, June.
    8. Vilches-Montero, Sonia & Pandit, Ameet & Bravo-Olavarria, Renzo & Chao, Chih-Wei (Fred), 2018. "What loyal women (and men) want: The role of gender and loyalty program characteristics in driving store loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 64-70.
    9. Islam, Tahir & Pitafi, Abdul Hameed & Akhtar, Naeem & Xiaobei, Liang, 2021. "Determinants of purchase luxury counterfeit products in social commerce: The mediating role of compulsive internet use," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Da HUO & Yan CHEN & Ken HUNG & Rihui OUYANG & Baowen SUN & Yinghui CAI, 2019. "Quality Management of E-business: A Key Node Analysis of Ecological Network in Digital Economy by Using Artificial Intelligence," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 166-179, June.
    11. Yeh, Ching-Hsuan & Wang, Yi-Shun & Yieh, Kaili, 2016. "Predicting smartphone brand loyalty: Consumer value and consumer-brand identification perspectives," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 245-257.
    12. Wang, Yingjia & Lin, Jiaxin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2020. "Gray market and counterfeiting in supply chains: A review of the operations literature and implications to luxury industries," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Alberto Pastore, 2014. "No al falso! Un?indagine esplorativa sulle strategie anti-contraffazione delle fashion firms," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 81-102.
    14. Nastasje Johnson & Marike Venter, 2016. "Factors Affecting Consumer Resistance to Innovation Diffusion of E-Cigarettes," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(5), pages 108-119.
    15. Huang, Hongfu & He, Yong & Chen, Jing, 2019. "Competitive strategies and quality to counter parallel importation in global market," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 173-197.
    16. Bian, Xuemei & Wang, Kai-Yu & Smith, Andrew & Yannopoulou, Natalia, 2016. "New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4249-4258.
    17. Juelin Yin & Ali Quazi, 2018. "Business Ethics in the Greater China Region: Past, Present, and Future Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 815-835, July.
    18. Zhang, Qing & Jiang, Xiuqi & Zheng, Yini, 2023. "Blockchain adoption and gray markets in a global supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ismail Tamer Toklu & Salih Baran, 2017. "Attitude towards Counterfeit of Luxury Brands: A Research on Consumers in Turkey," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(11), pages 618-632, November.
    2. Yang, Kiseol, 2012. "Consumer technology traits in determining mobile shopping adoption: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 484-491.
    3. Qiong Wu & Shukuan Zhao, 2021. "Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Counterfeit Luxury Products: An Empirical Test of Linear and Inverted U-Shaped Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Dongxiao Gu & Jingjing Guo & Changyong Liang & Wenxing Lu & Shuping Zhao & Bing Liu & Tianyue Long, 2019. "Social Media-Based Health Management Systems and Sustained Health Engagement: TPB Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Jiahan Li & Mahsa Ghaffari & Lin Su, 2020. "Counterfeit luxury consumption strategies in a collectivistic culture: the case of China," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(5), pages 546-560, September.
    6. Lingling Wang & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2016. "A Stackelberg Game Theoretic Analysis of Incentive Effects under Perceived Risk for China’s Straw-Based Power Plant Supply Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Truong, Yann, 2013. "A cross-country study of consumer innovativeness and technological service innovation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 130-137.
    8. Guillard, Valérie, 2009. "La tendance de certains consommateurs à tout garder," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/5480 edited by Pinson, Christian.
    9. Jordan Gašper & Leskovar Robert & Marič Miha, 2018. "Impact of Fear of Identity Theft and Perceived Risk on Online Purchase Intention," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 51(2), pages 146-155, May.
    10. Izquierdo-Yusta, Alicia & Martínez–Ruiz, María Pilar & Pérez–Villarreal, Héctor Hugo, 2022. "Studying the impact of food values, subjective norm and brand love on behavioral loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Alicia Izquierdo–Yusta & María Pilar Martínez–Ruiz & Héctor Hugo Pérez–Villarreal, 2021. "Studying the impact of food values, subjective norms and brand love on loyalty: findings obtained at fast food restaurants in Mexico," DOCFRADIS Working Papers 2103, Catedra Fundación Ramón Areces de Distribución Comercial, revised Mar 2021.
    12. Diamantopoulos, A. & Reynolds, N.L. & Simintiras, A.C., 2006. "The impact of response styles on the stability of cross-national comparisons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(8), pages 925-935, August.
    13. Mahmut Sonmez & Deli Yang & Gerald Fryxell, 2013. "Interactive Role of Consumer Discrimination and Branding against Counterfeiting: A Study of Multinational Managers’ Perception of Global Brands in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 195-211, June.
    14. Ernest Cyril de Run & Hiram Ting, 2013. "Generational cohorts and their attitudes toward advertising," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 25(2), pages 143-160.
    15. Sadiq, Muhammad Ahsan & Rajeswari, Balasundaram & Ansari, Lubna & Danish Kirmani, Mohd, 2021. "The role of food eating values and exploratory behaviour traits in predicting intention to consume organic foods: An extended planned behaviour approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    16. Aschmoneit, Hauke & Schneider, Martin, 2011. "Kundenverhalten im Kontext der Produkt- und Markenpiraterie: Eine empirische Analyse bei hessischen Studierenden zur Abgrenzung von Verhaltensdeterminanten," Discussion Papers on Strategy and Innovation 11-03, Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Technology and Innovation Management (TIM).
    17. Zerbini, Cristina & Luceri, Beatrice & Vergura, Donata Tania, 2017. "Leveraging consumer’s behaviour to promote generic drugs in Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(4), pages 397-406.
    18. Qin, Yao & Shi, Linda Hui & Song, Lei & Stöttinger, Barbara & Tan, Kang (Frank), 2018. "Integrating consumers’ motives with suppliers’ solutions to combat Shanzhai: A phenomenon beyond counterfeit," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 229-237.
    19. Chao-Chih Hung & Che-Huei Lin, 2015. "The Relationships among Buyers’ Perceived Risk, Exhibitors’ Brand Equity, Purchase Postponement and Switching Intention-From the Perspectives of Perceived Risk Theory and Expectancy Theory," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 7(4), pages 74-89.
    20. Islam, Tahir & Pitafi, Abdul Hameed & Akhtar, Naeem & Xiaobei, Liang, 2021. "Determinants of purchase luxury counterfeit products in social commerce: The mediating role of compulsive internet use," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:114:y:2013:i:3:p:409-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.