IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v61y2018i2p229-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating consumers’ motives with suppliers’ solutions to combat Shanzhai: A phenomenon beyond counterfeit

Author

Listed:
  • Qin, Yao
  • Shi, Linda Hui
  • Song, Lei
  • Stöttinger, Barbara
  • Tan, Kang (Frank)

Abstract

Imitation goods are widely spread throughout the global business world. Shanzhai imitation (▪) represents a type of imitation that mimics the original brand through surface or functional similarities but often provides enhanced or innovative features adapted to local market needs. Although both practitioners and academics have studied and provided solutions to combat counterfeits, solutions for original brand manufacturers to address threats from Shanzhai products are lacking. In this article, we first differentiate Shanzhai products from counterfeits. Using a mixed-method approach that combines interviews and laboratory experiment results, we then identify social, individual, functional, and financial (SIFF) factors as driving forces behind consumers’ purchasing of Shanzhai products. Shanzhai buyers place more weight on functional value and price/quality ratio than do counterfeit buyers, who in turn favor social value and materialism more than Shanzhai buyers. Finally, we provide several recommendations to original manufacturers from both the demand and supply sides.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin, Yao & Shi, Linda Hui & Song, Lei & Stöttinger, Barbara & Tan, Kang (Frank), 2018. "Integrating consumers’ motives with suppliers’ solutions to combat Shanzhai: A phenomenon beyond counterfeit," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 229-237.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:61:y:2018:i:2:p:229-237
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.11.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681317301647
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.11.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ludovica Cesareo, 2016. "Counterfeiting and Piracy," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, number 978-3-319-25357-2, June.
    2. Richins, Marsha L & Dawson, Scott, 1992. "A Consumer Values Orientation for Materialism and Its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(3), pages 303-316, December.
    3. Haruvy, Ernan & Li, Sherry Xin & McCabe, Kevin & Twieg, Peter, 2017. "Communication and visibility in public goods provision," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 276-296.
    4. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    5. Li, Bingqing & Wang, Lijia & Lu, Guoxiang, 2017. "Price dynamics, social networks and communication," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 197-201.
    6. Berman, Barry, 2008. "Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 191-199.
    7. Cesareo, Ludovica & Stöttinger, Barbara, 2015. "United we stand, divided we fall: How firms can engage consumers in their fight against counterfeits," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 527-537.
    8. ., 2017. "Creating community," Chapters, in: Creating Cities/Building Cities, chapter 9, pages 146-164, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1980. "Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(3), pages 283-295, December.
    10. Michael Austin & Marshall Eckblad & Courtney Markovich & Jacqunette Murray & Wade Perry & Nick Strok & Mark L. J. Wright, 2017. "A New Era of Community Banking," Chicago Fed Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    11. Adam J. L. Harris & Han-Hui Por & Stephen B. Broomell, 2017. "Anchoring climate change communications," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 387-398, February.
    12. Jiang, Yasong & Li, Taisong & Zhang, Yan & Yan, Yonghong, 2017. "Collective prediction based on community structure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 587-598.
    13. Shabana Khan & Jyoti L. Mishra & Kuna-hui Elaine Lin & Emma E. H. Doyle, 2017. "Rethinking communication in risk interpretation and action," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(3), pages 1709-1726, September.
    14. Cordell, Victor V. & Wongtada, Nittaya & Kieschnick, Robert Jr., 1996. "Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 41-53, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Xiaoping & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Supply chain operations with online platforms under the cap-and-trade regulation: Impacts of using blockchain technology," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Liangyan Wang & Brian Wu & Cornelia Pechmann & Yitong Wang, 2023. "The performance effects of creative imitation on original products: Evidence from lab and field experiments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 171-196, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Davidson & Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno & Michel Laroche, 2019. "Shame on You: When Materialism Leads to Purchase Intentions Toward Counterfeit Products," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 479-494, March.
    2. Shannon Mason, 2020. "Adoption and usage of Academic Social Networks: a Japan case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1751-1767, March.
    3. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & Yves Roy, 2019. "Do product category and consumers' motivations profiles matter regarding counterfeiting?," Post-Print hal-02396896, HAL.
    4. Franz Sinabell & Fabian Unterlass & Peter Walder & Jochen Kantelhardt, 2017. "Österreich 2025 – Innovation: der Motor für Wachstum und Beschäftigung in der ländlichen Wirtschaft," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60801, February.
    5. Pejcic, Ana V. & Iskrov, Georgi & Jakovljevic, Mihajlo Michael & Stefanov, Rumen, 2018. "Access to orphan drugs – comparison across Balkan countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(6), pages 583-589.
    6. Selma Kalyoncuoglu & Begum Sahin, 2017. "Moderating Role of Materialism in the Effect of Perceived Value on Purchase Intention of Counterfeits of Luxury Brands," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(4), pages 76-88, August.
    7. Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot & Pierre Valette-Florence, 2022. "“All you need is love”. From product design value perception to luxury brand love: An integrated framework," Post-Print hal-03562015, HAL.
    8. Vandecasteele, Bert & Geuens, Maggie, 2010. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 308-318.
    9. Chun-Hsiung Liao & I Hsieh, 2013. "Determinants of Consumer’s Willingness to Purchase Gray-Market Smartphones," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 409-424, May.
    10. Shwu-Ing Wu & Hui-Ling Chang, 2016. "The Model of Relationship between the Perceived Values and the Purchase Behaviors toward Innovative Products," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(2), pages 31-45, May.
    11. Mirza A. Haq, Arsalan Mujahid Ghouri, 2017. "Distinctive Characteristics of Mobile Advertising in Measuring Consumers' Attitude: An Empirical Study," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 4(2), pages 199-216, October.
    12. Seon Hee Kim & Se Ran Yoo & Hyeon Mo Jeon, 2022. "The role of experiential value, novelty, and satisfaction in robot barista coffee shop in South Korea: COVID-19 crisis and beyond," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(3), pages 771-790, September.
    13. Raja Kifaya & Daniele Rama, 2023. "Determinants of organic tunisian purchasing behaviour: an application of the consumption values theory," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2023(2), pages 161-177, June.
    14. Suhaiza Zailani & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Sunghyup Sean Hyun & Mohd Helmi Ali, 2019. "Applying the Theory of Consumption Values to Explain Drivers’ Willingness to Pay for Biofuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, January.
    15. André Le Roux & Marinette Thébault & Yves Roy, 2019. "Exploring consumer behavior regarding counterfeiting: how product category, product attributes, purchase situation and consumers' motivations profiles impact behavior regarding counterfeits and genuin," Post-Print hal-02396977, HAL.
    16. Yoo, Boonghee & Lee, Seung-Hee, 2012. "Asymmetrical effects of past experiences with genuine fashion luxury brands and their counterfeits on purchase intention of each," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 1507-1515.
    17. B. Vandecasteele & M. Geuens, 2008. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept and Measurement," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/532, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    18. Swami, Viren & Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas & Furnham, Adrian, 2009. "Faking it: Personality and individual difference predictors of willingness to buy counterfeit goods," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 820-825, October.
    19. Marta Biancardi & Andrea Liddo & Giovanni Villani, 2020. "Fines Imposed on Counterfeiters and Pocketed by the Genuine Firm. A Differential Game Approach," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 58-78, March.
    20. Kaufmann, Hans Ruediger & Petrovici, Dan Alex & Filho, Cid Gonçalves & Ayres, Adriano, 2016. "Identifying moderators of brand attachment for driving customer purchase intention of original vs counterfeits of luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5735-5747.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:61:y:2018:i:2:p:229-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.