IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i9p1495-d226438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Media-Based Health Management Systems and Sustained Health Engagement: TPB Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Dongxiao Gu

    (The School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
    The School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, Bloomington, IN 47405-3907, USA)

  • Jingjing Guo

    (The School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Changyong Liang

    (The School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Wenxing Lu

    (The School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Shuping Zhao

    (The School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Bing Liu

    (China Academy of Social Management & School of Sociology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100000, China)

  • Tianyue Long

    (The School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

Abstract

Background: With the popularity of mobile Internet and social networks, an increasing number of social media-based health management systems (SocialHMS) have emerged in recent years. These social media-based systems have been widely used in registration, payment, decision-making, chronic diseases management, health information and medical expenses inquiry, etc., and they greatly facilitate the convenience for people to obtain health services. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing sustained health engagement of SocialHMS by combining the theory of planned behavior (TPB) with the big-five theory and the trust theory. Method: We completed an empirical analysis based on the 494 pieces of data collected from Anhui Medical University first affiliated hospital (AMU) in East China through structural equation modeling and SmartPLS (statistical analysis software). Results: Openness to new experience has a significantly positive influence on attitude (path coefficient = 0.671, t = 24.0571, R 2 = 0.451), perceived behavioral control (path coefficient = 0.752, t = 32.2893, R 2 = 0.565), and perceived risk (path coefficient = 0.651, t = 18.5940, R 2 = 0.424), respectively. Attitude, perceived behavioral control, subjective norms, and trust have a significantly positive influence on sustained health engagement (path coefficients = 0.206, 0.305, 0.197, 0.183 respectively, t = 3.6684, 4.9158, 4.3414, and 3.3715, respectively). The explained variance of the above factors to the sustained health engagement of SocialHMS is 60.7% ( R 2 = 0.607). Perceived risk has a significantly negative influence on trust (path coefficient = 0.825, t = 46.9598, R 2 = 0.681). Conclusions: Attitude, perceived behavioral control, subjective norm, and trust are the determinants that affect sustained health engagement. The users’ personality trait of openness to new experience and perceived risk were also found to be important factors for sustained health engagement. For hospital managers, there is the possibility to take appropriate measures based on users’ personality to further enhance the implementation and utilization of SocialHMS. As for system suppliers, they can provide the optimal design for SocialHMS so as to meet users’ needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongxiao Gu & Jingjing Guo & Changyong Liang & Wenxing Lu & Shuping Zhao & Bing Liu & Tianyue Long, 2019. "Social Media-Based Health Management Systems and Sustained Health Engagement: TPB Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:9:p:1495-:d:226438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/9/1495/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/9/1495/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Chechen Liao & Hong-Nan Lin & Yu-Ping Liu, 2010. "Predicting the Use of Pirated Software: A Contingency Model Integrating Perceived Risk with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 237-252, January.
    3. Aoife De Brún & Eilish McAuliffe, 2018. "Social Network Analysis as a Methodological Approach to Explore Health Systems: A Case Study Exploring Support among Senior Managers/Executives in a Hospital Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Datis Khajeheian & Amir Mohammad Colabi & Nordiana Binti Ahmad Kharman Shah & Che Wan Jasimah Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, 2018. "Effect of Social Media on Child Obesity: Application of Structural Equation Modeling with the Taguchi Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Archana Tyagi & Ragini Tyagi, 2012. "Social Media: Opportunities and Challenges for Human Resource Management," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (IJKBO), IGI Global, vol. 2(2), pages 54-67, April.
    6. Fraedrich, John Paul & Ferrell, O. C., 1992. "The impact of perceived risk and moral philosophy type on ethical decision making in business organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 283-295, June.
    7. Pilar Marqués-Sánchez & María F. Muñoz-Doyague & Yolanda V. Martínez & Martin Everett & Nestor Serrano-Fuentes & Peter Van Bogaert & Ivaylo Vassilev & David Reeves, 2018. "The Importance of External Contacts in Job Performance: A Study in Healthcare Organizations Using Social Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Bent Egberg Mikkelsen & Paul Bloch & Helene Christine Reinbach & Tine Buch-Andersen & Lise Lawaetz Winkler & Ulla Toft & Charlotte Glümer & Bjarne Bruun Jensen & Jens Aagaard-Hansen, 2018. "Project SoL—A Community-Based, Multi-Component Health Promotion Intervention to Improve Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Practices among Danish Families with Young Children Part 2: Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    10. Haiyan Wu & Shan Wu & Haibo Wu & Qiming Xia & Ningxiu Li, 2017. "Living Arrangements and Health-Related Quality of Life in Chinese Adolescents Who Migrate from Rural to Urban Schools: Mediating Effect of Social Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-10, October.
    11. Davis, Donald D. & Bjornberg, Nathan H., 2015. "Flourishing in the Workplace Through Meditation and Mindfulness," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(4), pages 667-674, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao Liu & Zhenyu Wang & Xiaoyan Han, 2024. "The Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmers’ Green Production Behavior: Mediating Effects Based on Ecological Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Avery Apperson & Michael Stellefson & Samantha R. Paige & Beth H. Chaney & J. Don Chaney & Min Qi Wang & Arjun Mohan, 2019. "Facebook Groups on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Social Media Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Yi-Wen Chen, 2020. "Sustainable Value Co-Creation in the Virtual Community: How Diversified Co-Creation Experience Affects Co-Creation Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Abdullah F. Alnaim & Nadia Abdelhamid Abdelmegeed Abdelwahed, 2023. "Examining the Impact of Marketing Motives and Concerns on User Satisfaction and Re-Purchase Intentions in a Sharing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Young-Jae Kim & Seung-Woo Kang, 2021. "An Analysis of the Relationship between the Modified Theory of Planned Behavior and Leisure Rumination of Korean Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Bai Liu & Shuyan Guo & Bin Ding, 2020. "Technical Blossom in Medical Care: The Influence of Big Data Platform on Medical Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Junjie Zhou & Tingting Fan, 2019. "Understanding the Factors Influencing Patient E-Health Literacy in Online Health Communities (OHCs): A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Michael Stellefson & Samantha R. Paige & Beth H. Chaney & J. Don Chaney, 2020. "Social Media and Health Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-5, May.
    9. Siyu Zhang & Weiyan Hu & Jiaojiao Zhang & Mengran Li & Qingying Zhu, 2020. "Mismatches in Suppliers’ and Demanders’ Cognition, Willingness and Behavior with Respect to Ecological Protection of Cultivated Land: Evidence from Caidian District, Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Ailian Zhang & Mengmeng Pan, 2020. "“Smart Process” of Medical Innovation: The Synergism Based on Network and Physical Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Liu, Paul C.Y. & Zhu, Fei & Wang, Jie, 2024. "The apple doesn't fall far from the tree: Parenting styles and its effects on family business succession intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    12. Sandri, Orana & Holdsworth, Sarah & Wong, Peter S.P. & Hayes, Jan, 2024. "Upskilling plumber gasfitters for hydrogen: An empirical study using the Theory of Planned Behavior," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Peeraya Thongkruer & Sawat Wanarat, 2023. "The Relationship between Air Travel Service Quality and Factors of Theory of Planned Behavior: Evidence from Low-Cost Airlines in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Užar Dubravka & Filipović Jelena, 2023. "Understanding Consumers’ Intention to Purchase GI Cheeses Based on the SEM-Logit Model," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 87-96, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiong Wu & Shukuan Zhao, 2021. "Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Counterfeit Luxury Products: An Empirical Test of Linear and Inverted U-Shaped Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Debora Bettiga & Lucio Lamberti & Emanuele Lettieri, 2020. "Individuals’ adoption of smart technologies for preventive health care: a structural equation modeling approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 203-214, June.
    3. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    4. Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2013. "Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    5. Peter Mantello & Manh-Tung Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2023. "Machines that feel: behavioral determinants of attitude towards affect recognition technology—upgrading technology acceptance theory with the mindsponge model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Fox, Stephen & Groesser, Stefan N., 2016. "Reframing the relevance of research to practice," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 457-465.
    7. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    8. Fatima Zahra Barrane & Gahima Egide Karuranga & Diane Poulin, 2018. "Technology Adoption and Diffusion: A New Application of the UTAUT Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Joan Torrent-Sellens & Cristian Salazar-Concha & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Francesc Saigí-Rubió, 2021. "Using Digital Platforms to Promote Blood Donation: Motivational and Preliminary Evidence from Latin America and Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Garima Malik & A. Sajeevan Rao, 2019. "Extended expectation-confirmation model to predict continued usage of ODR/ride hailing apps: role of perceived value and self-efficacy," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 461-482, December.
    11. Wang, Guoqiang & Tan, Garry Wei-Han & Yuan, Yunpeng & Ooi, Keng-Boon & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "Revisiting TAM2 in behavioral targeting advertising: A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Scott, Stephanie & Hughes, Paul & Hodgkinson, Ian & Kraus, Sascha, 2019. "Technology adoption factors in the digitization of popular culture: Analyzing the online gambling market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Pan Gong & Ningshuang Zeng & Kunhui Ye & Markus König, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Acceptance of 4D BIM in EPC Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Cabrera-Sánchez, Juan-Pedro & Villarejo-Ramos, à ngel F., 2020. "Acceptance and use of big data techniques in services companies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    16. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    17. Cowan, Kelly R. & Daim, Tugrul U., 2011. "Review of technology acquisition and adoption research in the energy sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 183-199.
    18. Chia-Chien Hsu & Brian Sandford & Chia-Ju Ling & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Can the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Help Explain Subjective Well-Being in Senior Citizens due to Gateball Participation?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Asmussen, Katherine E. & Mondal, Aupal & Bhat, Chandra R., 2022. "Adoption of partially automated vehicle technology features and impacts on vehicle miles of travel (VMT)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 156-179.
    20. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:48:p:373 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Herman Fassou Haba & Omkar Dastane, 2018. "An Empirical Investigation on Taxi Hailing Mobile App Adoption: A Structural Equation Modelling," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 48-72, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:9:p:1495-:d:226438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.