IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v35y2024i2p766-782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When the Clock Strikes: A Multimethod Investigation of On-the-Hour Effects in Online Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Ni Huang

    (Miami Herbert Business School, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33146)

  • Lingli Wang

    (School of Modern Post, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China)

  • Yili Hong

    (Miami Herbert Business School, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33146)

  • Lihui Lin

    (School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Xunhua Guo

    (School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Guoqing Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Online learners often experience a lack of sustained motivation given the self-paced nature of online learning, resulting in inefficiency and a high dropout rate. Therefore, it is important to explore options that help users optimize their learning behavior and improve their learning performance. This study proposes that on-the-hour time points as external temporal cues can significantly influence online learning outcomes. Using a multimethod approach (i.e., archival data analysis, laboratory experiments, and framed field experiments), we show that (a) starting learning sessions at on-the-hour time points activates users’ implemental mindset, which supports them in building greater learning persistence and achieving better learning performance, and (b) social presence significantly attenuates the effects of on-the-hour time points in online learning. Our findings add to the literature on the design of online learning systems by clarifying the effects of temporal cues in user-system interactions, which provides implications for notification and reminder strategies that can be implemented to further enhance the effectiveness of online learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ni Huang & Lingli Wang & Yili Hong & Lihui Lin & Xunhua Guo & Guoqing Chen, 2024. "When the Clock Strikes: A Multimethod Investigation of On-the-Hour Effects in Online Learning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 766-782, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:2:p:766-782
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2023.1234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.1234
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2023.1234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer J. Argo & Darren W. Dahl & Rajesh V. Manchanda, 2005. "The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 207-212, September.
    2. Leonard Lee & Dan Ariely, 2006. "Shopping Goals, Goal Concreteness, and Conditional Promotions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 60-70, June.
    3. Hengchen Dai & Katherine L. Milkman & Jason Riis, 2014. "The Fresh Start Effect: Temporal Landmarks Motivate Aspirational Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2563-2582, October.
    4. Gefen, David & Straub, Detmar W., 2004. "Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 407-424, December.
    5. Maryam Alavi & Dorothy E. Leidner, 2001. "Research Commentary: Technology-Mediated Learning—A Call for Greater Depth and Breadth of Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, March.
    6. Dan Ariely & Anat Bracha & Stephan Meier, 2009. "Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(1), pages 544-555, March.
    7. Radhika Santhanam & Sharath Sasidharan & Jane Webster, 2008. "Using Self-Regulatory Learning to Enhance E-Learning-Based Information Technology Training," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 26-47, March.
    8. Yonat Zwebner & Rom Y Schrift & Margaret C Campbell & Rebecca K Ratner, 2020. "On My Own: The Aversion to Being Observed during the Preference-Construction Stage," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 47(4), pages 475-499.
    9. Dahl, Darren W & Manchanda, Rajesh V & Argo, Jennifer J, 2001. "Embarrassment in Consumer Purchase: The Roles of Social Presence and Purchase Familiarity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(3), pages 473-481, December.
    10. Natarajan Balasubramanian & Jeongsik Lee & Jagadeesh Sivadasan, 2018. "Deadlines, Workflows, Task Sorting, and Work Quality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1804-1824, April.
    11. Anne-Laure Sellier & Tamar Avnet, 2014. "So what if the clock strikes? Scheduling style, control, and well-being," Post-Print hal-01097582, HAL.
    12. Eric J. Allen & Patricia M. Dechow & Devin G. Pope & George Wu, 2017. "Reference-Dependent Preferences: Evidence from Marathon Runners," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1657-1672, June.
    13. Sucharita Chandran & Vicki G. Morwitz, 2005. "Effects of Participative Pricing on Consumers' Cognitions and Actions: A Goal Theoretic Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 249-259, September.
    14. Yanping Tu & Dilip Soman, 2014. "The Categorization of Time and Its Impact on Task Initiation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 810-822.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mäenpää, Katariina & Kale, Sudhir H. & Kuusela, Hannu & Mesiranta, Nina, 2008. "Consumer perceptions of Internet banking in Finland: The moderating role of familiarity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 266-276.
    2. Hwang, YooHee & Shin, Joongwon & Mattila, Anna S., 2018. "So private, yet so public: The impact of spatial distance, other diners, and power on solo dining experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 36-47.
    3. Jana Holthöwer & Jenny Doorn, 2023. "Robots do not judge: service robots can alleviate embarrassment in service encounters," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 767-784, July.
    4. Bitsch, Linda & Hanf, Jon & Hildenbrand, Andreas & Pabst, Evelyn & Schilling, Ulrich, 2017. "Partizipative Preissetzung bei Weinverkostungen: Ein Pay-What-You-Want-Experiment," 57th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 13-15, 2017 261994, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    5. Kohei Kawaguchi & Kosuke Uetake & Yasutora Watanabe, 2019. "Effectiveness of Product Recommendations Under Time and Crowd Pressures," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 253-273, March.
    6. Radhika Santhanam & De Liu & Wei-Cheng Milton Shen, 2016. "Research Note—Gamification of Technology-Mediated Training: Not All Competitions Are the Same," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 453-465, June.
    7. Myles Landers, V. & Esmark Jones, Carol L. & Barney, Christian, 2024. "The social influence of employee groups: Understanding the impact of employee groups on customer intentions through intimidation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Drevs, Florian, 2013. "The Challenge of the Unknown – The Effect of Pay-What-You-Want on the Market Success of Publicly Subsidized Films," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 36(4), pages 255-270.
    9. Koo, Minjung & Dai, Hengchen & Mai, Ke Michael & Song, Camilla Eunyoung, 2020. "Anticipated temporal landmarks undermine motivation for continued goal pursuit," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 142-157.
    10. He, Yi & Chen, Qimei & Alden, Dana L., 2012. "Consumption in the public eye: The influence of social presence on service experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 302-310.
    11. Valérie Guillard & Eva Delacroix, 2012. ""J'espère que ce commerçant ne me parlera pas !" : l'effet de l'anxiété sociale et du degré d'intimité de la conversation sur l'intention de revenir dans le point de vente," Post-Print hal-01630516, HAL.
    12. Jia Gao & Ying Rong & Xin Tian & Yuliang Yao, 2024. "Improving Convenience or Saving Face? An Empirical Analysis of the Use of Facial Recognition Payment Technology in Retail," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 16-27, March.
    13. Söderlund, Magnus, 2011. "Other customers in the retail environment and their impact on the customer’s evaluations of the retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 174-182.
    14. Rai, Dipankar & (Wilson) Lin, Chien-Wei & Jiraporn, Napatsorn, 2021. "The impact of scheduling styles on time-limited promotions: The moderating role of redemption frames," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 774-786.
    15. Sungwoo Choi & Anna S. Mattila, 2018. "The Effect of Experience Congruity on Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Public Commitment," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 124-138, June.
    16. Preeti Narwal & J. K. Nayak & Shivam Rai, 2022. "Assessing Customers' Moral Disengagement from Reciprocity Concerns in Participative Pricing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 537-554, June.
    17. Jordan Etkin & Cassie Mogilner, 2016. "Does Variety Among Activities Increase Happiness?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 210-229.
    18. Kao Si & Xianchi Dai, 2022. "The memory-search frame effect: impacts on consumers’ retrieval and evaluation of consumption experiences," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 5-17, March.
    19. Otterbring, Tobias, 2021. "Peer presence promotes popular choices: A “Spicy†field study on social influence and brand choice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    20. Alvin Chung Man Leung & Radhika Santhanam & Ron Chi-Wai Kwok & Wei Thoo Yue, 2023. "Could Gamification Designs Enhance Online Learning Through Personalization? Lessons from a Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 27-49, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:2:p:766-782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.